Literature DB >> 21588614

1,2-Dimeth-oxy-3-[(E)-2-nitro-ethen-yl]benzene.

Yuehong Ren1, Ruitao Zhu.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(11)NO(4), was synthesized via condensation of 2,3-dimeth-oxy-benzaldehyde with nitro-methane using microwave irradiation without solvent. The H atoms of the -CH=CH- group are in a trans configuration. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the benzene ring and the nitro-alkenyl group is 23.90 (6)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588614      PMCID: PMC3007981          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810030539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the use of nitro­alkenes in organic synthesis, see: Ranu & Banerjee (2005 ▶); Ballini et al. (2005 ▶). For a related structure, see: Pedireddi et al. (1992 ▶). For the synthetic procedure, see: Wang & Wang (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H11NO4 M = 209.20 Monoclinic, a = 5.3558 (7) Å b = 13.5897 (11) Å c = 14.2646 (12) Å β = 97.038 (1)° V = 1030.41 (18) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.38 × 0.35 × 0.34 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.961, T max = 0.965 4852 measured reflections 1798 independent reflections 1351 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.035

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.058 wR(F 2) = 0.226 S = 1.14 1798 reflections 139 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.41 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810030539/lh5097sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810030539/lh5097Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H11NO4F(000) = 440
Mr = 209.20Dx = 1.349 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1678 reflections
a = 5.3558 (7) Åθ = 3.0–25.5°
b = 13.5897 (11) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 14.2646 (12) ÅT = 296 K
β = 97.038 (1)°Flake, colorless
V = 1030.41 (18) Å30.38 × 0.35 × 0.34 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1798 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1351 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.035
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.961, Tmax = 0.965k = −16→15
4852 measured reflectionsl = −15→16
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.058H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.226w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1507P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.14(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1798 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.41 e Å3
139 parametersΔρmin = −0.41 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.17 (3)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.8816 (4)0.34090 (16)0.43863 (15)0.0521 (7)
O11.0954 (4)0.35541 (16)0.47743 (16)0.0740 (7)
O20.7912 (4)0.25907 (15)0.42869 (17)0.0818 (8)
O30.1183 (3)0.38811 (12)0.21248 (12)0.0532 (6)
O4−0.2003 (3)0.53204 (13)0.14689 (13)0.0581 (6)
C10.7376 (5)0.4265 (2)0.40583 (19)0.0544 (7)
H1A0.79900.48870.42340.065*
C20.5216 (5)0.4187 (2)0.35173 (16)0.0503 (7)
H20.46840.35560.33350.060*
C30.3580 (4)0.50020 (18)0.31776 (16)0.0454 (7)
C40.1580 (4)0.48261 (15)0.24744 (16)0.0439 (7)
C5−0.0092 (4)0.55801 (18)0.21569 (17)0.0470 (7)
C60.0260 (5)0.65146 (18)0.2532 (2)0.0532 (7)
H6−0.08440.70190.23240.064*
C70.2273 (5)0.6697 (2)0.3224 (2)0.0583 (8)
H70.25150.73280.34700.070*
C80.3908 (5)0.5959 (2)0.35469 (18)0.0546 (7)
H80.52370.60920.40120.066*
C90.2010 (7)0.3753 (2)0.1216 (2)0.0716 (9)
H9A0.11210.42020.07740.107*
H9B0.16820.30900.10050.107*
H9C0.37830.38820.12590.107*
C10−0.3741 (5)0.6077 (2)0.11368 (19)0.0605 (8)
H10A−0.45380.63270.16550.091*
H10B−0.49940.58110.06660.091*
H10C−0.28580.66000.08670.091*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0511 (13)0.0521 (13)0.0517 (13)0.0009 (9)0.0004 (10)0.0000 (9)
O10.0514 (13)0.0756 (14)0.0899 (16)−0.0045 (9)−0.0114 (11)0.0064 (11)
O20.0785 (14)0.0510 (13)0.1072 (18)−0.0008 (11)−0.0232 (12)−0.0064 (11)
O30.0637 (12)0.0361 (10)0.0589 (11)−0.0052 (7)0.0039 (8)−0.0025 (7)
O40.0527 (11)0.0494 (12)0.0677 (12)0.0033 (8)−0.0113 (9)−0.0026 (8)
C10.0542 (16)0.0471 (15)0.0607 (15)−0.0005 (11)0.0027 (12)0.0022 (12)
C20.0519 (15)0.0492 (15)0.0498 (14)−0.0010 (11)0.0064 (11)−0.0013 (11)
C30.0460 (13)0.0461 (14)0.0443 (12)0.0015 (10)0.0064 (10)0.0018 (10)
C40.0498 (13)0.0343 (13)0.0484 (13)−0.0022 (9)0.0097 (11)0.0010 (9)
C50.0473 (14)0.0442 (14)0.0497 (13)0.0013 (10)0.0064 (11)0.0017 (10)
C60.0563 (16)0.0438 (15)0.0592 (15)0.0077 (10)0.0061 (12)−0.0032 (11)
C70.0644 (18)0.0476 (15)0.0614 (16)0.0029 (12)0.0023 (13)−0.0131 (11)
C80.0543 (15)0.0543 (16)0.0542 (15)−0.0005 (12)0.0029 (11)−0.0100 (12)
C90.093 (2)0.0542 (17)0.0689 (19)−0.0040 (15)0.0134 (16)−0.0164 (14)
C100.0549 (16)0.0626 (18)0.0621 (17)0.0057 (13)−0.0009 (13)0.0123 (13)
N1—O21.214 (3)C4—C51.399 (3)
N1—O11.225 (3)C5—C61.382 (3)
N1—C11.442 (3)C6—C71.391 (4)
O3—C41.385 (3)C6—H60.9300
O3—C91.431 (3)C7—C81.374 (4)
O4—C51.375 (3)C7—H70.9300
O4—C101.428 (3)C8—H80.9300
C1—C21.314 (3)C9—H9A0.9600
C1—H1A0.9300C9—H9B0.9600
C2—C31.458 (4)C9—H9C0.9600
C2—H20.9300C10—H10A0.9600
C3—C41.395 (3)C10—H10B0.9600
C3—C81.406 (4)C10—H10C0.9600
O2—N1—O1122.5 (2)C5—C6—H6120.1
O2—N1—C1120.7 (2)C7—C6—H6120.1
O1—N1—C1116.7 (2)C8—C7—C6120.9 (2)
C4—O3—C9112.83 (19)C8—C7—H7119.5
C5—O4—C10116.8 (2)C6—C7—H7119.5
C2—C1—N1121.5 (2)C7—C8—C3120.3 (2)
C2—C1—H1A119.2C7—C8—H8119.8
N1—C1—H1A119.2C3—C8—H8119.8
C1—C2—C3125.7 (2)O3—C9—H9A109.5
C1—C2—H2117.1O3—C9—H9B109.5
C3—C2—H2117.1H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C4—C3—C8118.5 (2)O3—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C3—C2119.1 (2)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C8—C3—C2122.4 (2)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
O3—C4—C3119.2 (2)O4—C10—H10A109.5
O3—C4—C5119.9 (2)O4—C10—H10B109.5
C3—C4—C5120.8 (2)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
O4—C5—C6124.5 (2)O4—C10—H10C109.5
O4—C5—C4115.7 (2)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4119.7 (2)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C6—C7119.7 (2)
O2—N1—C1—C2−10.7 (4)C10—O4—C5—C4179.7 (2)
O1—N1—C1—C2170.1 (2)O3—C4—C5—O4−2.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3177.7 (2)C3—C4—C5—O4−179.41 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C4168.5 (2)O3—C4—C5—C6177.7 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C8−12.9 (4)C3—C4—C5—C61.0 (4)
C9—O3—C4—C3−103.4 (3)O4—C5—C6—C7−179.6 (2)
C9—O3—C4—C579.9 (3)C4—C5—C6—C7−0.1 (4)
C8—C3—C4—O3−177.9 (2)C5—C6—C7—C8−0.6 (4)
C2—C3—C4—O30.7 (3)C6—C7—C8—C30.4 (4)
C8—C3—C4—C5−1.3 (3)C4—C3—C8—C70.5 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5177.4 (2)C2—C3—C8—C7−178.1 (2)
C10—O4—C5—C6−0.7 (4)
  3 in total

Review 1.  Conjugate additions of nitroalkanes to electron-poor alkenes: recent results.

Authors:  Roberto Ballini; Giovanna Bosica; Dennis Fiorini; Alessandro Palmieri; Marino Petrini
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Ionic liquid as catalyst and reaction medium. The dramatic influence of a task-specific ionic liquid, [bmIm]OH, in Michael addition of active methylene compounds to conjugated ketones, carboxylic esters, and nitriles.

Authors:  Brindaban C Ranu; Subhash Banerjee
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.005

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.