Literature DB >> 21588400

2,6-Difluoro-benzoic acid.

Mohammad T M Al-Dajani, Habibah A Wahab, Nornisah Mohamed, Chin Sing Yeap, Hoong-Kun Fun.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(7)H(4)F(2)O(2), the dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the carboxyl-ate group is 33.70 (14)°. In the crystal structure, inversion dimers linked by pairs of O-H⋯O hydro-gren bonds occur, generating R(2) (2)(8) loops. The dimers are linked into sheets lying parallel to (102) by C-H⋯F hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588400      PMCID: PMC3007258          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810028758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to 2,6-diflorobenzyl­chloride derivatives, see: Beavo (1995 ▶); Beavo & Reifsnyder (1990 ▶); Nicholson et al. (1991 ▶). For the stability of the temperature controller used in the data collection, see: Cosier & Glazer (1986 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H4F2O2 M = 158.10 Monoclinic, a = 3.6517 (4) Å b = 14.1214 (15) Å c = 12.2850 (13) Å β = 95.651 (3)° V = 630.42 (12) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.16 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.73 × 0.19 × 0.09 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII DUO CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.841, T max = 0.986 6112 measured reflections 2190 independent reflections 1895 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.029

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.049 wR(F 2) = 0.143 S = 1.12 2190 reflections 116 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810028758/hb5558sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810028758/hb5558Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H4F2O2F(000) = 320
Mr = 158.10Dx = 1.666 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3166 reflections
a = 3.6517 (4) Åθ = 3.3–32.1°
b = 14.1214 (15) ŵ = 0.16 mm1
c = 12.2850 (13) ÅT = 100 K
β = 95.651 (3)°Needle, colourless
V = 630.42 (12) Å30.73 × 0.19 × 0.09 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII DUO CCD diffractometer2190 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1895 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.029
φ and ω scansθmax = 32.1°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.841, Tmax = 0.986k = −20→20
6112 measured reflectionsl = −18→18
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.143All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.12w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0668P)2 + 0.3079P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2190 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
116 parametersΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.31 e Å3
Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cryosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat (Cosier & Glazer, 1986) operating at 100.0 (1) K.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.0410 (3)−0.01635 (6)0.16839 (7)0.0312 (2)
F20.2348 (3)0.26707 (6)0.36896 (7)0.0285 (2)
O20.2287 (3)0.09843 (7)0.46658 (7)0.0238 (2)
O30.4751 (3)−0.00746 (7)0.35958 (8)0.0222 (2)
C10.0163 (4)0.07830 (9)0.17659 (9)0.0194 (2)
C2−0.1413 (4)0.12763 (10)0.08679 (10)0.0228 (3)
C3−0.1734 (4)0.22519 (10)0.09441 (10)0.0234 (3)
C4−0.0482 (4)0.27250 (10)0.19005 (11)0.0230 (3)
C50.1044 (4)0.22003 (9)0.27793 (9)0.0184 (2)
C60.1398 (3)0.12160 (8)0.27576 (9)0.0160 (2)
C70.2939 (3)0.06665 (8)0.37288 (9)0.0156 (2)
H2−0.221 (7)0.0927 (16)0.0182 (18)0.038 (6)*
H3−0.285 (6)0.2599 (15)0.0302 (17)0.035 (5)*
H4−0.074 (6)0.3406 (16)0.1979 (18)0.035 (5)*
H1O20.341 (11)0.062 (3)0.526 (3)0.098 (12)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0518 (6)0.0183 (4)0.0219 (4)0.0019 (4)−0.0044 (4)−0.0039 (3)
F20.0459 (6)0.0169 (4)0.0210 (4)−0.0010 (4)−0.0048 (4)−0.0018 (3)
O20.0340 (6)0.0238 (5)0.0135 (4)0.0038 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0013 (3)
O30.0269 (5)0.0179 (4)0.0216 (4)0.0056 (4)0.0012 (4)0.0030 (3)
C10.0238 (6)0.0181 (5)0.0162 (5)0.0001 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0003 (4)
C20.0242 (6)0.0289 (6)0.0150 (5)−0.0002 (5)−0.0006 (4)0.0019 (4)
C30.0224 (6)0.0289 (6)0.0184 (5)0.0037 (5)−0.0001 (4)0.0078 (4)
C40.0272 (6)0.0193 (6)0.0225 (6)0.0041 (5)0.0016 (5)0.0062 (4)
C50.0210 (5)0.0174 (5)0.0166 (5)0.0004 (4)0.0012 (4)0.0011 (4)
C60.0182 (5)0.0160 (5)0.0137 (4)0.0009 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0019 (3)
C70.0174 (5)0.0148 (5)0.0148 (4)−0.0006 (4)0.0020 (4)0.0012 (3)
F1—C11.3442 (15)C2—H20.99 (2)
F2—C51.3467 (14)C3—C41.3892 (19)
O2—C71.2794 (14)C3—H30.98 (2)
O2—H1O20.96 (4)C4—C51.3807 (17)
O3—C71.2574 (15)C4—H40.97 (2)
C1—C21.3815 (17)C5—C61.3965 (17)
C1—C61.3976 (16)C6—C71.4866 (15)
C2—C31.387 (2)
C7—O2—H1O2113 (2)C5—C4—H4119.3 (13)
F1—C1—C2117.86 (11)C3—C4—H4122.2 (13)
F1—C1—C6118.83 (11)F2—C5—C4117.84 (11)
C2—C1—C6123.29 (12)F2—C5—C6118.74 (10)
C1—C2—C3118.58 (12)C4—C5—C6123.38 (11)
C1—C2—H2119.4 (13)C5—C6—C1115.44 (10)
C3—C2—H2122.0 (13)C5—C6—C7122.18 (10)
C2—C3—C4120.79 (11)C1—C6—C7122.37 (11)
C2—C3—H3118.2 (13)O3—C7—O2123.76 (11)
C4—C3—H3121.0 (13)O3—C7—C6119.51 (10)
C5—C4—C3118.49 (12)O2—C7—C6116.72 (10)
F1—C1—C2—C3179.13 (13)C4—C5—C6—C7−177.92 (12)
C6—C1—C2—C31.2 (2)F1—C1—C6—C5−179.87 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C40.3 (2)C2—C1—C6—C5−1.92 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.9 (2)F1—C1—C6—C7−0.65 (19)
C3—C4—C5—F2178.01 (12)C2—C1—C6—C7177.31 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C60.0 (2)C5—C6—C7—O3−147.25 (13)
F2—C5—C6—C1−176.65 (11)C1—C6—C7—O333.57 (18)
C4—C5—C6—C11.31 (19)C5—C6—C7—O233.33 (17)
F2—C5—C6—C74.12 (18)C1—C6—C7—O2−145.84 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1O2···O3i0.95 (4)1.68 (4)2.6318 (14)174 (4)
C3—H3···F2ii0.98 (2)2.54 (2)3.3428 (16)138.7 (16)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H1O2⋯O3i0.95 (4)1.68 (4)2.6318 (14)174 (4)
C3—H3⋯F2ii0.98 (2)2.54 (2)3.3428 (16)138.7 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 2.  Differential modulation of tissue function and therapeutic potential of selective inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzymes.

Authors:  C D Nicholson; R A Challiss; M Shahid
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 3.  Primary sequence of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isozymes and the design of selective inhibitors.

Authors:  J A Beavo; D H Reifsnyder
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 4.  Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: functional implications of multiple isoforms.

Authors:  J A Beavo
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Structural Aspects of the Ortho Chloro- and Fluoro- Substituted Benzoic Acids: Implications on Chemical Properties.

Authors:  Gulce Ogruc Ildiz; Rui Fausto
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.