Literature DB >> 21588065

2-(7-Meth-oxy-1-naphth-yl)acetonitrile.

Wen-Bin Wei, Ru Jia, Jie Sun, Hai-Bo Wang.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(13)H(11)NO, is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.013 Å), apart from the cyanide group, for which the C and N atoms deviate from the mean plane of the other atoms by 0.341 (3) and 0.571 (4) Å, respectively. In the crystal, weak aromatic π-π stacking [centroid-centroid distance = 3.758 (3) Å] may help to stabilize the structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588065      PMCID: PMC3006982          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810024372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to the use of naphthyl­ethyl acetonitrile as an inter­mediate for the synthesisis of N-naphthyl­ethyl amide derivatives, see: Depreux & Lesieur (1994 ▶). For further synthetic details, see: Yous & Andrieux (1992 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C13H11NO M = 197.23 Monoclinic, a = 7.5110 (15) Å b = 9.6170 (19) Å c = 14.731 (3) Å β = 101.03 (3)° V = 1044.4 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.976, T max = 0.992 1971 measured reflections 1897 independent reflections 1045 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.011 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.059 wR(F 2) = 0.163 S = 1.00 1897 reflections 136 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.14 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810024372/hb5505sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810024372/hb5505Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C13H11NOF(000) = 416
Mr = 197.23Dx = 1.254 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point: 353 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.5110 (15) ÅCell parameters from 25 reflections
b = 9.6170 (19) Åθ = 9–13°
c = 14.731 (3) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
β = 101.03 (3)°T = 293 K
V = 1044.4 (4) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1045 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.011
graphiteθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.5°
ω/2θ scansh = −9→8
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −11→0
Tmin = 0.976, Tmax = 0.992l = 0→17
1971 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 200 reflections
1897 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.163H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.069P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1897 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
136 parametersΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.14 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O0.8616 (3)−0.2547 (2)0.13823 (13)0.0718 (6)
N0.7349 (5)0.1342 (3)−0.3297 (2)0.1076 (12)
C10.7327 (4)0.0786 (3)−0.2623 (2)0.0691 (9)
C20.7316 (4)0.0085 (3)−0.17484 (17)0.0565 (7)
H2A0.8471−0.0380−0.15500.068*
H2B0.6376−0.0620−0.18420.068*
C30.6992 (3)0.1069 (3)−0.09873 (18)0.0484 (7)
C40.6435 (4)0.2412 (3)−0.1174 (2)0.0622 (8)
H4A0.62280.2727−0.17820.075*
C50.6171 (4)0.3319 (3)−0.0472 (3)0.0716 (9)
H5A0.57940.4227−0.06130.086*
C60.6466 (4)0.2874 (3)0.0411 (2)0.0685 (9)
H6A0.62930.34860.08760.082*
C70.7028 (4)0.1504 (3)0.06461 (19)0.0552 (8)
C80.7346 (4)0.1027 (3)0.1570 (2)0.0675 (9)
H8A0.72000.16350.20420.081*
C90.7857 (4)−0.0299 (4)0.1779 (2)0.0685 (9)
H9A0.8060−0.05960.23910.082*
C100.8086 (4)−0.1236 (3)0.10760 (19)0.0564 (7)
C110.7816 (3)−0.0820 (3)0.01827 (18)0.0495 (7)
H11A0.7979−0.1448−0.02750.059*
C120.7285 (3)0.0571 (3)−0.00618 (18)0.0471 (7)
C130.8857 (4)−0.3548 (3)0.0708 (2)0.0723 (9)
H13A0.9233−0.44150.10070.108*
H13B0.9768−0.32290.03800.108*
H13C0.7733−0.36770.02800.108*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O0.0897 (16)0.0689 (14)0.0570 (12)0.0037 (12)0.0148 (11)0.0088 (11)
N0.177 (4)0.085 (2)0.062 (2)−0.005 (2)0.024 (2)0.0025 (17)
C10.092 (2)0.064 (2)0.0507 (18)−0.0084 (18)0.0111 (16)−0.0041 (16)
C20.0636 (19)0.0525 (17)0.0549 (17)−0.0034 (14)0.0150 (14)−0.0016 (14)
C30.0441 (15)0.0478 (16)0.0553 (17)−0.0072 (13)0.0142 (13)−0.0041 (13)
C40.065 (2)0.0532 (18)0.070 (2)−0.0012 (15)0.0164 (15)0.0030 (16)
C50.074 (2)0.0490 (18)0.097 (3)0.0035 (16)0.0285 (19)−0.0043 (18)
C60.073 (2)0.057 (2)0.084 (2)−0.0069 (16)0.0352 (18)−0.0222 (17)
C70.0506 (17)0.0552 (19)0.0636 (19)−0.0093 (14)0.0210 (14)−0.0135 (15)
C80.074 (2)0.073 (2)0.062 (2)−0.0102 (18)0.0293 (16)−0.0217 (17)
C90.078 (2)0.082 (2)0.0499 (17)−0.0113 (19)0.0234 (16)−0.0027 (17)
C100.0572 (18)0.0583 (18)0.0552 (18)−0.0043 (14)0.0141 (14)0.0006 (15)
C110.0491 (16)0.0508 (17)0.0519 (17)−0.0058 (13)0.0182 (13)−0.0061 (13)
C120.0384 (15)0.0485 (16)0.0565 (17)−0.0098 (12)0.0142 (12)−0.0069 (13)
C130.078 (2)0.0579 (19)0.079 (2)0.0039 (16)0.0087 (18)0.0028 (17)
O—C101.372 (3)C6—H6A0.9300
O—C131.419 (3)C7—C81.413 (4)
N—C11.130 (4)C7—C121.417 (3)
C1—C21.456 (4)C8—C91.350 (4)
C2—C31.522 (3)C8—H8A0.9300
C2—H2A0.9700C9—C101.407 (4)
C2—H2B0.9700C9—H9A0.9300
C3—C41.369 (4)C10—C111.353 (4)
C3—C121.422 (3)C11—C121.422 (4)
C4—C51.396 (4)C11—H11A0.9300
C4—H4A0.9300C13—H13A0.9600
C5—C61.347 (4)C13—H13B0.9600
C5—H5A0.9300C13—H13C0.9600
C6—C71.406 (4)
C10—O—C13117.4 (2)C8—C7—C12118.8 (3)
N—C1—C2179.1 (4)C9—C8—C7120.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3113.2 (2)C9—C8—H8A119.5
C1—C2—H2A108.9C7—C8—H8A119.5
C3—C2—H2A108.9C8—C9—C10120.4 (3)
C1—C2—H2B108.9C8—C9—H9A119.8
C3—C2—H2B108.9C10—C9—H9A119.8
H2A—C2—H2B107.8C11—C10—O124.9 (3)
C4—C3—C12119.7 (3)C11—C10—C9120.6 (3)
C4—C3—C2121.6 (3)O—C10—C9114.5 (3)
C12—C3—C2118.7 (2)C10—C11—C12120.5 (3)
C3—C4—C5121.5 (3)C10—C11—H11A119.8
C3—C4—H4A119.2C12—C11—H11A119.8
C5—C4—H4A119.2C7—C12—C3118.3 (3)
C6—C5—C4119.8 (3)C7—C12—C11118.7 (2)
C6—C5—H5A120.1C3—C12—C11123.0 (2)
C4—C5—H5A120.1O—C13—H13A109.5
C5—C6—C7121.4 (3)O—C13—H13B109.5
C5—C6—H6A119.3H13A—C13—H13B109.5
C7—C6—H6A119.3O—C13—H13C109.5
C6—C7—C8121.9 (3)H13A—C13—H13C109.5
C6—C7—C12119.3 (3)H13B—C13—H13C109.5
  4 in total

1.  Novel naphthalenic ligands with high affinity for the melatonin receptor.

Authors:  S Yous; J Andrieux; H E Howell; P J Morgan; P Renard; B Pfeiffer; D Lesieur; B Guardiola-Lemaitre
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1992-04-17       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel naphthalenic and bioisosteric related amidic derivatives as melatonin receptor ligands.

Authors:  P Depreux; D Lesieur; H A Mansour; P Morgan; H E Howell; P Renard; D H Caignard; B Pfeiffer; P Delagrange; B Guardiola
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.