Literature DB >> 21587597

β-Polymorph of phenazepam: a powder study.

Gleb B Sergeev1, Boris M Sergeev, Yurii N Morosov, Vladimir V Chernyshev.   

Abstract

THE TITLE COMPOUND [SYSTEMATIC NAME: 7-bromo-5-(2-chloro-phen-yl)-1H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2(3H)-one] (β-polymorph), C(15)H(10)BrClN(2)O, has been obtained via cryomodification of the known α-polymorph of phenazepam [Karapetyan et al. (1979 ▶). Bioorg. Khim.5, 1684-1690]. In both polymorphs, the mol-ecules, which differ only in the dihedral angles between the aromatic rings [75.4 (2)° and 86.2 (3)° in the α- and β-polymorphs, respectively], are linked into centrosymmetric dimers via N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal structure of the β-polymorph, weak inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds further link these dimers into layers parallel to bc plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21587597      PMCID: PMC2983154          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810037402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For details of the synthesis via cryomodification, see: Sergeev & Komarov (2006 ▶). For the crystal structure of the α-polymorph of phenazepam, see: Karapetyan et al. (1979 ▶). For details of the indexing algorithm, see: Werner et al. (1985 ▶). The methodology of the refinement (including applied restraints) has been described in detail by Ryabova et al. (2005 ▶). For the March–Dollase orientation correction, see: Dollase (1986 ▶) and for the split-type pseudo-Voigt profile, see: Toraya (1986 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C15H10BrClN2O M = 349.61 Monoclinic, a = 14.8006 (19) Å b = 11.6756 (14) Å c = 8.4769 (9) Å β = 93.679 (17)° V = 1461.8 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Cu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.54059 Å μ = 5.49 mm−1 T = 295 K Flat sheet, 15 × 1 mm

Data collection

Guinier camera G670 diffractometer Specimen mounting: thin layer in the specimen holder of the camera Data collection mode: transmission Scan method: continuous 2θmin = 5.00°, 2θmax = 80.00°, 2θstep = 0.01°

Refinement

R p = 0.013 R wp = 0.017 R exp = 0.012 R Bragg = 0.059 χ2 = 2.250 7501 data points 128 parameters 64 restraints H-atom parameters not refined Data collection: G670 Imaging Plate Guinier Camera Software (Huber, 2002 ▶); cell refinement: MRIA (Zlokazov & Chernyshev, 1992 ▶); data reduction: G670 Imaging Plate Guinier Camera Software; method used to solve structure: simulated annealing (Zhukov et al., 2001 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: MRIA; molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: MRIA and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810037402/lh5126sup1.cif Rietveld powder data: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810037402/lh5126Isup2.rtv Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C15H10BrClN2OF(000) = 696
Mr = 349.61Dx = 1.589 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.54059 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcµ = 5.49 mm1
a = 14.8006 (19) ÅT = 295 K
b = 11.6756 (14) ÅParticle morphology: no specific habit
c = 8.4769 (9) Ålight grey
β = 93.679 (17)°flat sheet, 15 × 1 mm
V = 1461.8 (3) Å3Specimen preparation: Prepared at 77 K and 6.6 10-6 kPa
Z = 4
Guinier camera G670 diffractometerData collection mode: transmission
Radiation source: line-focus sealed tubeScan method: continuous
Curved Germanium (111)min = 5.00°, 2θmax = 80.00°, 2θstep = 0.01°
Specimen mounting: thin layer in the specimen holder of the camera
Refinement on InetProfile function: split-type pseudo-Voigt (Toraya, 1986)
Least-squares matrix: full with fixed elements per cycle128 parameters
Rp = 0.01364 restraints
Rwp = 0.0170 constraints
Rexp = 0.012H-atom parameters not refined
RBragg = 0.059Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
χ2 = 2.250(Δ/σ)max = 0.004
7501 data pointsBackground function: Chebyshev polynomial up to the 5th order
Excluded region(s): nonePreferred orientation correction: March-Dollase (Dollase, 1986); direction of preferred orientation 001, texture parameter r = 0.93(1).
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.77280 (15)0.40430 (17)−0.3314 (2)0.0470 (11)*
C20.8173 (12)0.4317 (13)−0.1182 (18)0.074 (9)*
C30.8911 (12)0.3743 (12)−0.044 (2)0.075 (8)*
H30.92000.3154−0.09430.090*
C40.9202 (11)0.4080 (13)0.109 (2)0.063 (9)*
H40.96840.36960.16160.076*
C50.8784 (12)0.4986 (15)0.1866 (18)0.076 (8)*
C60.8023 (12)0.5539 (13)0.110 (2)0.076 (9)*
C70.7727 (11)0.5187 (16)−0.0430 (18)0.071 (8)*
H70.72280.5540−0.09450.085*
N80.9112 (9)0.5266 (11)0.3406 (13)0.064 (6)*
H80.92470.46960.40200.077*
C90.9248 (12)0.6346 (12)0.406 (2)0.072 (8)*
O100.9656 (7)0.6458 (8)0.5370 (13)0.057 (5)*
C110.8837 (11)0.7351 (13)0.311 (2)0.070 (8)*
H11A0.89660.80600.36740.084*
H11B0.91130.73960.21010.084*
N120.7856 (8)0.7217 (10)0.2827 (16)0.062 (7)*
C130.7513 (11)0.6468 (13)0.1858 (19)0.061 (8)*
C140.6501 (11)0.6452 (14)0.1602 (18)0.071 (9)*
C150.6074 (12)0.7367 (12)0.077 (2)0.074 (8)*
H150.64250.79530.03840.089*
C160.5134 (11)0.7411 (11)0.051 (2)0.075 (8)*
H160.48640.8028−0.00330.090*
C170.4600 (11)0.6530 (13)0.106 (2)0.073 (9)*
H170.39760.65400.08340.087*
C180.5002 (12)0.5633 (14)0.1936 (17)0.074 (9)*
H180.46460.50670.23560.089*
C190.5943 (12)0.5595 (13)0.2180 (16)0.065 (8)*
Cl200.6428 (3)0.4396 (4)0.3145 (5)0.054 (2)*
Br1—C21.910 (15)C11—N121.46 (2)
C2—C71.39 (2)C11—H11A0.9704
C2—C31.40 (2)C11—H11B0.9697
C3—C41.40 (2)N12—C131.28 (2)
C3—H30.9297C13—C141.50 (2)
C4—C51.41 (2)C14—C191.41 (2)
C4—H40.9299C14—C151.41 (2)
C5—N81.402 (19)C15—C161.40 (2)
C5—C61.42 (2)C15—H150.9299
C6—C71.41 (2)C16—C171.39 (2)
C6—C131.49 (2)C16—H160.9299
C7—H70.9301C17—C181.40 (2)
N8—C91.389 (19)C17—H170.9301
N8—H80.8600C18—C191.40 (3)
C9—O101.23 (2)C18—H180.9303
C9—C111.53 (2)C19—Cl201.751 (16)
C7—C2—C3121.6 (14)C9—C11—H11A109.4
C7—C2—Br1114.3 (11)N12—C11—H11B109.4
C3—C2—Br1124.1 (12)C9—C11—H11B109.4
C4—C3—C2118.1 (15)H11A—C11—H11B108.0
C4—C3—H3120.9C13—N12—C11121.6 (14)
C2—C3—H3121.0N12—C13—C6125.6 (14)
C3—C4—C5121.7 (15)N12—C13—C14116.8 (14)
C3—C4—H4119.2C6—C13—C14117.3 (14)
C5—C4—H4119.2C19—C14—C15117.4 (15)
N8—C5—C4118.1 (15)C19—C14—C13124.2 (14)
N8—C5—C6122.4 (15)C15—C14—C13118.4 (14)
C4—C5—C6119.3 (14)C16—C15—C14121.2 (15)
C7—C6—C5118.7 (15)C16—C15—H15119.4
C7—C6—C13118.3 (15)C14—C15—H15119.4
C5—C6—C13123.0 (14)C17—C16—C15120.0 (14)
C2—C7—C6120.6 (15)C17—C16—H16120.0
C2—C7—H7119.7C15—C16—H16120.0
C6—C7—H7119.7C16—C17—C18120.0 (15)
C9—N8—C5128.2 (13)C16—C17—H17120.0
C9—N8—H8115.9C18—C17—H17120.0
C5—N8—H8115.9C19—C18—C17119.4 (15)
O10—C9—N8120.5 (13)C19—C18—H18120.3
O10—C9—C11123.4 (13)C17—C18—H18120.3
N8—C9—C11116.1 (14)C18—C19—C14121.9 (14)
N12—C11—C9111.1 (13)C18—C19—Cl20118.0 (12)
N12—C11—H11A109.4C14—C19—Cl20120.0 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N8—H8···O10i0.862.152.865 (16)141
C11—H11B···O10ii0.972.183.03 (2)145
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N8—H8⋯O10i0.862.152.865 (16)141
C11—H11B⋯O10ii0.972.183.03 (2)145

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  Structural characterization of [1,4]diazepino[6,5-b]indoles by powder diffraction.

Authors:  Svetlana Yu Ryabova; Nina A Rastorgueva; Eduard J Sonneveld; Rene Peschar; Henk Schenk; Viktor A Tafeenko; Leonid A Aslanov; Vladimir V Chernyshev
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2005-03-16

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Validation of molecular crystal structures from powder diffraction data with dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D).

Authors:  Jacco van de Streek; Marcus A Neumann
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Cryochemical Synthesis of Polymorphous Nanostructures of a Steroid Neurohormone.

Authors:  Yurii Morozov; Dmitry Chistyakov; Vladimir Chernyshev; Gleb Sergeev
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  The Polymorphism of Drugs: New Approaches to the Synthesis of Nanostructured Polymorphs.

Authors:  Dmitry Chistyakov; Gleb Sergeev
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.321

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.