Literature DB >> 21587116

Decompression of the portal bed and twice-baseline portal inflow are necessary for the functional recovery of a "small-for-size" graft.

Amelia J Hessheimer1, Constantino Fondevila, Pilar Taurá, Javier Muñoz, Olga Sánchez, José Fuster, Antoni Rimola, Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In partial liver transplant, a reduction in the intrahepatic vascular bed produces a rise in the portal vein flow and the portal venous pressure gradient, leading to endothelial and, thereby, hepatocellular injury and death in a process known as "small-for-size" (SFS) syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that a calibrated portocaval shunt prevents superfluous inflow in a porcine model of SFS transplant.
METHODS: Donor pigs (15-20 kg) underwent 70% hepatectomy. In 2 groups, a 6 mm (S6) (n = 6) or 12 mm (S12) (n = 6) Gore-Tex shunt was placed between the portal vein and infrahepatic inferior vena cava. In a third group, no portocaval shunt was placed (SFS) (n = 17). Grafts were stored for 5 hours at 4°C and then transplanted into recipients (30-35 kg).
RESULTS: Five-day survival was 29% in SFS, 100% in S6, and 0 in S12. Postreperfusion portal vein flow was 4-, 2-, and 1-times flow at baseline in SFS, S6, and S12, respectively. With respect to portal venous pressure gradient, both the 6- and 12-mm shunts effectively decompressed the portal bed. Aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin rose and the Quick prothrombin time fell in all animals after reperfusion but improved significantly by day 5 in S6. Serum levels of endothelin-1 remained elevated in SFS and S12 but returned to baseline by 12 hours in S6: 2.76 (2.05-4.08) and 2.04 (1.97-2.12) versus 0.43 (0.26-0.50) pg/mL, respectively (P < 0.05 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: A calibrated portocaval shunt that maintains portal vein flow about twice its baseline value produces a favorable outcome after SFS liver transplantation, avoiding endothelial injury due to portal hyperperfusion or to hypoperfusion because of excess shunting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21587116     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ffb2d7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

Review 1.  Small for size liver remnant following resection: prevention and management.

Authors:  Rony Eshkenazy; Yael Dreznik; Eylon Lahat; Barak Bar Zakai; Alex Zendel; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  [Small-for-size: experimental findings for liver surgery].

Authors:  C Eipel; K Abshagen; B Vollmar
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  A critical appraisal of the hemodynamic signal driving liver regeneration.

Authors:  Kerstin Abshagen; Christian Eipel; Brigitte Vollmar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Hepatic hemodynamic changes during liver transplantation: a review.

Authors:  An-Chieh Feng; Hsiu-Lung Fan; Teng-Wei Chen; Chung-Bao Hsieh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft.

Authors:  Masahiko Taniguchi; Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Satoru Todo; Hiroyuki Furukawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mirko D'Onofrio; Riccardo De Robertis; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Crosara; Stefano Canestrini; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-28

7.  Ischemic preconditioning attenuates acute lung injury after partial liver transplantation.

Authors:  Qinlong Liu; Hasibur Rehman; Yasodha Krishnasamy; John J Lemasters; Zhi Zhong
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-20

8.  Portal inflow preservation during portal diversion in small-for-size syndrome.

Authors:  Xian-Qiang Wang; Yue-Fang Xu; Jing-Wang Tan; Wen-Ping Lv; Zhe Liu; Jian-Ping Zeng; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Impact of mesocaval shunt on safe minimal liver remnant: porcine model.

Authors:  Yu-Liang Tu; Xuan Wang; Da-Dong Wang; Zi-Man Zhu; Jing-Wang Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Therapeutic targets for liver regeneration after acute severe injury: a preclinical overview.

Authors:  Hidenobu Kojima; Kojiro Nakamura; Jerzy W Kupiec-Weglinski
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.