Literature DB >> 21587113

Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections.

J Wesley Alexander1, Joseph S Solomkin, Michael J Edwards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to provide updated guidelines for the prevention of surgical wound infections based upon review and interpretation of the current and past literature.
BACKGROUND: The development and treatment of surgical wound infections has always been a limiting factor to the success of surgical treatment. Although continuous improvements have been made, surgical site infections continue to occur at an unacceptable rate, annually costing billions of dollars in economic loss caused by associated morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provided extensive recommendations for the control of surgical infections in 1999. Review of the current literature with interpretation of the findings has been done to update the recommendations.
RESULTS: New and sometimes conflicting studies indicate that coordination and application of techniques and procedures to decrease wound infections will be highly successful, even in patients with very high risks.
CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that uniform adherence to the proposed guidelines for the prevention of surgical infections could reduce wound infections significantly; namely to a target of less than 0.5% in clean wounds, less than 1% in clean contaminated wounds and less than 2% in highly contaminated wounds and decrease related costs to less than one-half of the current amount.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21587113     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821175f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  76 in total

Review 1.  Infections associated with spinal implants.

Authors:  Andrew Quaile
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [The current pathogen spectrum--what are we fighting against?].

Authors:  S Scheithauer; H Häfner; S W Lemmen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Can routine preoperative data predict adverse outcomes in the elderly? Development and validation of a simple risk model incorporating a chart-derived frailty score.

Authors:  Levana G Amrock; Mark D Neuman; Hung-Mo Lin; Stacie Deiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection in general surgery in a developing country.

Authors:  Emine Alp; Ferhan Elmali; Safiye Ersoy; Can Kucuk; Mehmet Doganay
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Predictors of Short-Term Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramanathan; Travis Mason; Luke G Wolfe; Brian J Kaplan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Intra-operative wound irrigation to reduce surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Mueller; Martin Loos; Bernhard Haller; André L Mihaljevic; Ulrich Nitsche; Dirk Wilhelm; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff; Franz G Bader
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  [Prevention of periprosthetic joint infections : Not evidence-based strategies].

Authors:  A Keshmiri; G Maderbacher; C Baier; H-R Springorum; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Optimal administration of cefazolin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  A Duffield; P Sultan; E T Riley; B Carvalho
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  External validation of the ventral hernia risk score for prediction of surgical site infections.

Authors:  Mike K Liang; Christopher J Goodenough; Robert G Martindale; J Scott Roth; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.150

10.  Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications.

Authors:  Ashley D Willoughby; Robert B Lim; Michael B Lustik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.