Literature DB >> 21587108

The quantitative assessment of risk factors to overstress at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion: removal of posterior ligaments and pedicle screws.

Ho-Joong Kim1, Kyoung-Tak Kang, Seong-Hwan Moon, Heoung-Jae Chun, Hak-Sun Kim, Jin-Oh Park, Eun-Su Moon, Bo-Ram Kim, Joon-Seok Sohn, Hwan-Mo Lee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Finite element method.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in the disc stress and range of motion (ROM) at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion based on whether or not pedicle screws are removed and whether or not the continuity of the proximal posterior ligament complex (PLC) is preserved. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ablation of proximal PLC continuity and the presence of pedicle screws have been reported to affect the biomechanics at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion. However, there have been few studies regarding the quantitative assessment of their contribution to overstress at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion.
METHODS: In the validated intact lumbar finite element model (L2-L5), four types of L3-L4 fusion models were simulated. These models included the preservation of the PLC continuity with pedicle screws (Pp WiP), the preservation of PLC continuity without pedicle screws (Pp WoP), the sacrifice of PLC with pedicle screws (Sp WiP), and the sacrifice of PLC without pedicle screws (Sp WoP). In each scenario, the ROM, maximal von Mises stress of discs, and the facet joint contract force at adjacent segments were analyzed. RESULTS.: Among the four models, the Sp WiP yielded the greatest increase in the ROM and the maximal von Mises stress of the disc at adjacent segments under four moments. Following the SP WiP, the order of increase of the ROM and the disc stress was Pp WiP, Sp WoP, and Pp WoP. Furthermore, the increase of ROM and disc stress at the proximal adjacent segment was more than at the distal adjacent segment under all four moments in each model. The facet joint contact was also most increased in the Sp WiP under extension and torsion moment.
CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that the preservation of the PLC continuity or the removal of pedicle screws after complete fusion could decrease the stress at adjacent segments, and their combination could act synergistically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21587108     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318221a595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jang-Woo Kim; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Posterior implant removal in patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures: long-term results.

Authors:  A J Smits; L den Ouden; A Jonkergouw; J Deunk; F W Bloemers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In vivo dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine: L4-5 lumbar degenerative disc diseases undergoing unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF.

Authors:  Tao Nie; De-Jian Chen; Benyu Tang; Quanwei Song; Xuqiang Liu; Bin Zhang; Min Dai; Guoan Li; Zongmiao Wan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Vacuum phenomenon as a predictor of kyphosis after implant removal following posterior pedicle screw fixation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirahata; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Youichi Yasui; Hiroyuki Oka; Iwao Yamamoto; Kazuaki Yamada; Muneyoshi Fujita; Hirotaka Kawano; Keisuke Ishii
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Biomechanics of extreme lateral interbody fusion with different internal fixation methods: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Li; Li-Jun She; Wei Zhang; Xiao-Dong Cheng; Jin-Peng Fan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Implant Removal Versus Implant Retention Following Posterior Surgical Stabilization of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Barry Ting Sheen Kweh; Terence Tan; Hui Qing Lee; Martin Hunn; Susan Liew; Jin Wee Tee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04-29

7.  Is It Necessary to Remove the Implants After Fixation of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures Without Fusion? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Xiangyu Xu; Yuan Cao; JiXing Fan; Yang Lv; Fang Zhou; Yun Tian; Hongquan Ji; Zhishan Zhang; Yan Guo; Zhongwei Yang; Guojin Hou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.