BACKGROUND: Interventions for preventing falls in older people often involve several components, multidisciplinary teams, and implementation in a variety of settings. We have developed a classification system (taxonomy) to describe interventions used to prevent falls in older people, with the aim of improving the design and reporting of clinical trials of fall-prevention interventions, and synthesis of evidence from these trials. METHODS: Thirty three international experts in falls prevention and health services research participated in a series of meetings to develop consensus. Robust techniques were used including literature reviews, expert presentations, and structured consensus workshops moderated by experienced facilitators. The taxonomy was refined using an international test panel of five health care practitioners. We assessed the chance corrected agreement of the final version by comparing taxonomy completion for 10 randomly selected published papers describing a variety of fall-prevention interventions. RESULTS: The taxonomy consists of four domains, summarized as the "Approach", "Base", "Components" and "Descriptors" of an intervention. Sub-domains include; where participants are identified; the theoretical approach of the intervention; clinical targeting criteria; details on assessments; descriptions of the nature and intensity of interventions. Chance corrected agreement of the final version of the taxonomy was good to excellent for all items. Further independent evaluation of the taxonomy is required. CONCLUSIONS: The taxonomy is a useful instrument for characterizing a broad range of interventions used in falls prevention. Investigators are encouraged to use the taxonomy to report their interventions.
BACKGROUND: Interventions for preventing falls in older people often involve several components, multidisciplinary teams, and implementation in a variety of settings. We have developed a classification system (taxonomy) to describe interventions used to prevent falls in older people, with the aim of improving the design and reporting of clinical trials of fall-prevention interventions, and synthesis of evidence from these trials. METHODS: Thirty three international experts in falls prevention and health services research participated in a series of meetings to develop consensus. Robust techniques were used including literature reviews, expert presentations, and structured consensus workshops moderated by experienced facilitators. The taxonomy was refined using an international test panel of five health care practitioners. We assessed the chance corrected agreement of the final version by comparing taxonomy completion for 10 randomly selected published papers describing a variety of fall-prevention interventions. RESULTS: The taxonomy consists of four domains, summarized as the "Approach", "Base", "Components" and "Descriptors" of an intervention. Sub-domains include; where participants are identified; the theoretical approach of the intervention; clinical targeting criteria; details on assessments; descriptions of the nature and intensity of interventions. Chance corrected agreement of the final version of the taxonomy was good to excellent for all items. Further independent evaluation of the taxonomy is required. CONCLUSIONS: The taxonomy is a useful instrument for characterizing a broad range of interventions used in falls prevention. Investigators are encouraged to use the taxonomy to report their interventions.
Authors: E H Wagner; A Z LaCroix; L Grothaus; S G Leveille; J A Hecht; K Artz; K Odle; D M Buchner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nancy K Latham; Craig S Anderson; Arier Lee; Derrick A Bennett; Anne Moseley; Ian D Cameron Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: C D Mulrow; M B Gerety; D Kanten; J E Cornell; L A DeNino; L Chiodo; C Aguilar; M B O'Neil; J Rosenberg; R M Solis Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-02-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julie Bruce; Anower Hossain; Ranjit Lall; Emma J Withers; Susanne Finnegan; Martin Underwood; Chen Ji; Chris Bojke; Roberta Longo; Claire Hulme; Susie Hennings; Ray Sheridan; Katharine Westacott; Shvaita Ralhan; Finbarr Martin; John Davison; Fiona Shaw; Dawn A Skelton; Jonathan Treml; Keith Willett; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: O Flabeau; G Laurendeau; H Laksir; S Castaings-Pelet; S Harston; I Bourdel-Marchasson Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Geert S A F Verheyden; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Ruth M Pickering; Dorit Kunkel; Sheila Lennon; Alexander C H Geurts; Ann Ashburn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-05-31
Authors: Natalie Willis; Sophie Hill; Jessica Kaufman; Simon Lewin; John Kis-Rigo; Sara Bensaude De Castro Freire; Xavier Bosch-Capblanch; Claire Glenton; Vivian Lin; Priscilla Robinson; Charles S Wiysonge Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2013-05-11