Literature DB >> 21585500

Holistic processing is tuned for in-group faces.

Kurt Hugenberg1, Olivier Corneille.   

Abstract

Past research has found that mere in-group/out-group categorizations are sufficient to elicit biases in face memory. The current research yields novel evidence that mere social categorization is also sufficient to modulate processes underlying face perception, even for faces for which we have strong perceptual expertise: same-race (SR) faces. Using the composite face paradigm, we find that SR faces categorized as in-group members (i.e., fellow university students) are processed more holistically than are SR faces categorized as out-group members (i.e., students at another university). Hence, holding perceptual expertise with faces constant, categorizing an SR target as an out-group member debilitates the strong holistic processing typically observed for SR faces.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Year:  2009        PMID: 21585500     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  10 in total

1.  Configural face processing impacts race disparities in humanization and trust.

Authors:  Brittany S Cassidy; Anne C Krendl; Kathleen A Stanko; Robert J Rydell; Steven G Young; Kurt Hugenberg
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-07-05

2.  Childhood contact predicts hemispheric asymmetry in cross-race face processing.

Authors:  Megan M Davis; Sean M Hudson; Debbie S Ma; Joshua Correll
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Mnemonic discrimination of similar face stimuli and a potential mechanism for the "other race" effect.

Authors:  Allen Chang; Elizabeth Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Neural correlates of the in-group memory advantage on the encoding and recognition of faces.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Tim Curran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perception of an ambiguous figure is affected by own-age social biases.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Owen Churches; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cross-Cultural Evidence for Apparent Racial Outgroup Advantage: Congruence between Perceived Facial Aggressiveness and Fighting Success.

Authors:  Vít Třebický; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner; Robert Mbe Akoko; Tomáš Kočnar; Jaroslava Varella Valentova; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Training Participants to Focus on Critical Facial Features Does Not Decrease Own-Group Bias.

Authors:  Tania Wittwer; Colin G Tredoux; Jacques Py; Pierre-Vincent Paubel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-13

9.  Age biases the judgment rather than the perception of an ambiguous figure.

Authors:  Ambroos Brouwer; Xuxi Jin; Aisha Humaira Waldi; Steven Verheyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Individual differences in holistic processing predict the own-race advantage in recognition memory.

Authors:  Joseph Degutis; Rogelio J Mercado; Jeremy Wilmer; Andrew Rosenblatt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.