Literature DB >> 21585437

The tractable cognition thesis.

Iris Van Rooij1.   

Abstract

The recognition that human minds/brains are finite systems with limited resources for computation has led some researchers to advance the Tractable Cognition thesis: Human cognitive capacities are constrained by computational tractability. This thesis, if true, serves cognitive psychology by constraining the space of computational-level theories of cognition. To utilize this constraint, a precise and workable definition of "computational tractability" is needed. Following computer science tradition, many cognitive scientists and psychologists define computational tractability as polynomial-time computability, leading to the P-Cognition thesis. This article explains how and why the P-Cognition thesis may be overly restrictive, risking the exclusion of veridical computational-level theories from scientific investigation. An argument is made to replace the P-Cognition thesis by the FPT-Cognition thesis as an alternative formalization of the Tractable Cognition thesis (here, FPT stands for fixed-parameter tractable). Possible objections to the Tractable Cognition thesis, and its proposed formalization, are discussed, and existing misconceptions are clarified. 2008 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21585437     DOI: 10.1080/03640210801897856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  21 in total

1.  Working memory mechanism in proportional quantifier verification.

Authors:  Marcin Zajenkowski; Jakub Szymanik; Maria Garraffa
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-12

2.  Complex problem solving: another test case?

Authors:  Marco Ragni; Christoph M Löffler
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-11-10

3.  Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult?

Authors:  Iris van Rooij; Johan Kwisthout; Mark Blokpoel; Jakub Szymanik; Todd Wareham; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Identifying and individuating cognitive systems: a task-based distributed cognition alternative to agent-based extended cognition.

Authors:  Jim Davies; Kourken Michaelian
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism.

Authors:  Andrea E Martin; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

7.  Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Jonathan R Rein; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2012-02-21

Review 8.  Cognitive architecture of perceptual organization: from neurons to gnosons.

Authors:  Peter A van der Helm
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-11-16

9.  People efficiently explore the solution space of the computationally intractable traveling salesman problem to find near-optimal tours.

Authors:  Daniel E Acuña; Víctor Parada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.