Literature DB >> 21584773

Conflicting effects of excitatory synaptic and electric coupling on the dynamics of square-wave bursters.

Natalia Toporikova1, Tzu-Hsin Tsao, Terrence Michael Wright, Robert J Butera.   

Abstract

Using two-cell and 50-cell networks of square-wave bursters, we studied how excitatory coupling of individual neurons affects the bursting output of the network. Our results show that the effects of synaptic excitation vs. electrical coupling are distinct. Increasing excitatory synaptic coupling generally increases burst duration. Electrical coupling also increases burst duration for low to moderate values, but at sufficiently strong values promotes a switch to highly synchronous bursts where further increases in electrical or synaptic coupling have a minimal effect on burst duration. These effects are largely mediated by spike synchrony, which is determined by the stability of the in-phase spiking solution during the burst. Even when both coupling mechanisms are strong, one form (in-phase or anti-phase) of spike synchrony will determine the burst dynamics, resulting in a sharp boundary in the space of the coupling parameters. This boundary exists in both two cell and network simulations. We use these results to interpret the effects of gap-junction blockers on the neuronal circuitry that underlies respiration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584773      PMCID: PMC3190594          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-011-0340-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  11 in total

1.  Models of respiratory rhythm generation in the pre-Bötzinger complex. I. Bursting pacemaker neurons.

Authors:  R J Butera; J Rinzel; J C Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Rhythmogenic effects of weak electrotonic coupling in neuronal models.

Authors:  A Sherman; J Rinzel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diffusively coupled bursters: effects of cell heterogeneity.

Authors:  G De Vries; A Sherman; H R Zhu
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Intrinsic bursters increase the robustness of rhythm generation in an excitatory network.

Authors:  L K Purvis; J C Smith; H Koizumi; R J Butera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Model for synchronization of pancreatic beta-cells by gap junction coupling.

Authors:  A Sherman; J Rinzel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  The NEURON simulation environment.

Authors:  M L Hines; N T Carnevale
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Topological and phenomenological classification of bursting oscillations.

Authors:  R Bertram; M J Butte; T Kiemel; A Sherman
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  Anti-phase, asymmetric and aperiodic oscillations in excitable cells--I. Coupled bursters.

Authors:  A Sherman
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Gap junctions and inhibitory synapses modulate inspiratory motoneuron synchronization.

Authors:  C Bou-Flores; A J Berger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Blockade of brain stem gap junctions increases phrenic burst frequency and reduces phrenic burst synchronization in adult rat.

Authors:  Irene C Solomon; Ki H Chon; Melissa N Rodriguez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.