Literature DB >> 21584676

Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs.

Carola Haering1, Andrea Kiesel.   

Abstract

Action effects do not occur randomly in time but follow our actions at specific delays. The ideomotor principle (IMP) is widely used to explain how the relation between actions and contingently following effects is acquired and numerous studies demonstrate robust action-effect learning. Yet, little is known about the acquisition of temporal delays of action effects. Here, we demonstrate that participants learn that action effects occur at specific delays. Participants responded slower to action effects that occurred earlier than usual. In addition, participants often prematurely responded before the effect when it occurred later than expected. Thus, in contrast to biases of time perception in action contexts (e.g., Haggard, Trends Cogn Sci 9:290-295, 2005; Stetson et al., Neuron 51:651-659, 2006), participants learn and exploit temporal regularities between actions and effects for behavioral control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584676     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0341-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  47 in total

1.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods.

Authors:  S A Los; C E van den Heuvel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability.

Authors:  L KARLIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

3.  Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Andrea Kiesel; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-19

4.  Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation.

Authors:  Chess Stetson; Xu Cui; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Temporal preparation improves temporal resolution: evidence from constant foreperiods.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Bettina Rolke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-11

6.  The microgenesis of action-effect binding.

Authors:  Ilona B Dutzi; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-09-23

7.  Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action.

Authors:  Manos Tsakiris; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials.

Authors:  D R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-03

9.  Averaging of temporal memories by rats.

Authors:  Dale N Swanton; Cynthia M Gooch; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07

10.  Agency, subjective time, and other minds.

Authors:  Kai Engbert; Andreas Wohlschläger; Richard Thomas; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be.

Authors:  David Dignath; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-14

2.  Intentional binding of two effects.

Authors:  Miriam Ruess; Roland Thomaschke; Carola Haering; Dorit Wenke; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-08

3.  Time perception and the experience of agency.

Authors:  Carola Haering; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-07

4.  Causing time: Evaluating causal changes to the when rather than the whether of an outcome.

Authors:  W James Greville; Marc J Buehner; Mark K Johansen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

Review 5.  The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.

Authors:  Nagireddy Neelakanteswar Reddy
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Harleß' Apparatus of Will: 150 years later.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-12

7.  Too Good to be True? Ideomotor Theory from a Computational Perspective.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-12

8.  A HTML5 open source tool to conduct studies based on Libet's clock paradigm.

Authors:  Pablo Garaizar; Carmelo P Cubillas; Helena Matute
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.