Literature DB >> 21583960

(S)-2-(1H-Imidazol-1-yl)succinic acid.

Jing-Mei Xiao1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(7)H(8)N(2)O(4), is a zwitterion, [formal name = (S)-3-carb-oxy-2-(imidazol-3-ium-1-yl)propano-ate], in which the deproton-ated negatively charged carboxyl-ate end shows almost identical C-O bond distances [1.248 (4) and 1.251 (4) Å] due to resonance. The mol-ecules are involved in inter-molecular O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which define a tightly bound three-dimensional structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583960      PMCID: PMC2977823          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809015220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the use of imidazol-1-ylalkanoic acids as probes to determine the intra­cellular and extracellular pH and cell volume by 1H NMR, see: López et al.(1996 ▶). For the preparation of the title compound, see: Bao et al. (2003 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H8N2O4 M = 184.15 Orthorhombic, a = 7.3212 (16) Å b = 7.9193 (16) Å c = 14.254 (3) Å V = 826.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.97, T max = 0.98 8489 measured reflections 1110 independent reflections 952 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.053

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.050 wR(F 2) = 0.151 S = 1.12 1110 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809015220/bg2234sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809015220/bg2234Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H8N2O4F(000) = 384
Mr = 184.15Dx = 1.480 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: p 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2123 reflections
a = 7.3212 (16) Åθ = 2.8–27.4°
b = 7.9193 (16) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 14.254 (3) ÅT = 293 K
V = 826.4 (3) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 40.25 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1110 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube952 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.053
CCD_Profile_fitting scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.97, Tmax = 0.98k = −10→10
8489 measured reflectionsl = −18→18
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.151H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.12w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0852P)2 + 0.2196P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1110 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.9679 (4)0.2336 (4)0.6099 (2)0.0299 (7)
C20.9073 (4)0.4110 (4)0.6415 (2)0.0309 (7)
H2A0.98460.44500.69430.037*
C30.9360 (5)0.5376 (4)0.5624 (2)0.0367 (7)
H3A1.05540.51970.53460.044*
H3B0.84470.51930.51420.044*
C40.9226 (5)0.7177 (4)0.5977 (2)0.0378 (7)
C50.6549 (5)0.4474 (5)0.7626 (3)0.0493 (10)
H50.72590.48260.81300.059*
C60.4741 (6)0.4230 (7)0.7635 (3)0.0640 (13)
H60.39620.43800.81440.077*
C70.5708 (5)0.3653 (5)0.6236 (3)0.0422 (8)
H70.57190.33330.56080.051*
N10.7172 (3)0.4110 (3)0.67364 (18)0.0314 (6)
N20.4268 (4)0.3725 (4)0.6766 (2)0.0507 (8)
H20.31750.34870.65890.061*
O10.8474 (4)0.1251 (3)0.5944 (2)0.0507 (7)
O21.1355 (3)0.2163 (3)0.59668 (16)0.0409 (6)
O30.9107 (5)0.8279 (3)0.52925 (19)0.0584 (9)
H3C0.89080.92900.54890.070*
O40.9181 (5)0.7543 (4)0.67883 (19)0.0638 (9)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0279 (14)0.0283 (15)0.0334 (15)0.0011 (12)−0.0001 (12)0.0036 (13)
C20.0315 (15)0.0274 (15)0.0338 (15)−0.0038 (13)0.0014 (13)−0.0015 (12)
C30.0455 (18)0.0265 (15)0.0382 (16)0.0006 (15)0.0092 (16)0.0019 (12)
C40.0396 (17)0.0287 (15)0.0452 (18)0.0001 (15)0.0057 (15)0.0020 (14)
C50.0390 (19)0.064 (3)0.045 (2)−0.0105 (19)0.0083 (16)−0.0169 (19)
C60.055 (2)0.077 (3)0.061 (2)−0.014 (2)0.024 (2)−0.022 (3)
C70.0345 (16)0.0433 (19)0.0486 (18)0.0050 (17)−0.0069 (16)−0.0066 (15)
N10.0293 (13)0.0301 (13)0.0349 (14)−0.0001 (11)−0.0025 (11)−0.0032 (11)
N20.0310 (14)0.0487 (18)0.072 (2)−0.0010 (15)−0.0041 (16)−0.0126 (16)
O10.0411 (13)0.0241 (12)0.087 (2)−0.0010 (10)0.0034 (14)−0.0071 (13)
O20.0350 (12)0.0383 (13)0.0494 (14)0.0044 (10)0.0047 (11)−0.0035 (11)
O30.090 (2)0.0294 (13)0.0560 (15)0.0060 (15)0.0122 (16)0.0052 (11)
O40.106 (3)0.0381 (14)0.0472 (15)0.0013 (17)−0.0113 (17)−0.0097 (12)
C1—O21.249 (4)C5—C61.338 (6)
C1—O11.251 (4)C5—N11.378 (4)
C1—C21.541 (4)C5—H50.9300
C2—N11.465 (4)C6—N21.347 (6)
C2—C31.522 (4)C6—H60.9300
C2—H2A0.9800C7—N21.299 (5)
C3—C41.516 (4)C7—N11.338 (4)
C3—H3A0.9700C7—H70.9300
C3—H3B0.9700N2—H20.8600
C4—O41.193 (4)O3—H3C0.8601
C4—O31.312 (4)
O2—C1—O1126.3 (3)O3—C4—C3112.6 (3)
O2—C1—C2115.3 (3)C6—C5—N1107.9 (4)
O1—C1—C2118.3 (3)C6—C5—H5126.1
N1—C2—C3111.3 (3)N1—C5—H5126.1
N1—C2—C1111.4 (2)C5—C6—N2106.7 (3)
C3—C2—C1110.1 (2)C5—C6—H6126.6
N1—C2—H2A108.0N2—C6—H6126.6
C3—C2—H2A108.0N2—C7—N1109.1 (3)
C1—C2—H2A108.0N2—C7—H7125.4
C4—C3—C2111.4 (3)N1—C7—H7125.4
C4—C3—H3A109.3C7—N1—C5106.4 (3)
C2—C3—H3A109.3C7—N1—C2126.5 (3)
C4—C3—H3B109.3C5—N1—C2127.1 (3)
C2—C3—H3B109.3C7—N2—C6109.9 (3)
H3A—C3—H3B108.0C7—N2—H2125.1
O4—C4—O3123.8 (3)C6—N2—H2125.1
O4—C4—C3123.6 (3)C4—O3—H3C112.9
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O2i0.861.912.716 (4)155
O3—H3C···O1ii0.861.712.572 (3)177
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2i0.861.912.716 (4)155
O3—H3C⋯O1ii0.861.712.572 (3)177

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  Synthesis of chiral ionic liquids from natural amino acids.

Authors:  Weiliang Bao; Zhiming Wang; Yuxia Li
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 4.354

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.