Literature DB >> 21583932

1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid.

Gui Hong Tang1, Dong Dong Li, Gang Huang, Xing Yan Xu, Xiang Chao Zeng.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(5)H(5)NO(2), the pyrrole ring and its carboxyl substituent are close to coplanar, with a dihedral angle of 11.7 (3)° between the planes. In the crystal structure, adjacent mol-ecules are linked by pairs of O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form inversion dimers. Additional N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link these dimers into chains extending along the a axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583932      PMCID: PMC2977796          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For pyrroles sourced from marine organisms, see: Faulkner (2002 ▶). For the bioactivity of pyrrole derivatives, see: Banwell et al. (2006 ▶); Sosa et al. (2002 ▶). For related structures, see: Zeng (2006 ▶); Zeng et al. (2007 ▶). For graph-set motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H5NO2 M = 111.10 Monoclinic, a = 14.080 (3) Å b = 5.0364 (10) Å c = 14.613 (3) Å β = 98.969 (3)° V = 1023.6 (3) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.42 × 0.40 × 0.37 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.954, T max = 0.959 2277 measured reflections 1006 independent reflections 875 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.015

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.063 wR(F 2) = 0.191 S = 1.06 1006 reflections 74 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.73 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker,1999 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1999 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014044/sj2604sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014044/sj2604Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H5NO2F(000) = 464
Mr = 111.10Dx = 1.442 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMelting point: 480 K
Hall symbol: -C 2ycMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 14.080 (3) ÅCell parameters from 1751 reflections
b = 5.0364 (10) Åθ = 2.8–27.0°
c = 14.613 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 98.969 (3)°T = 173 K
V = 1023.6 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 80.42 × 0.40 × 0.37 mm
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer1006 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube875 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.015
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −17→13
Tmin = 0.954, Tmax = 0.959k = −6→6
2277 measured reflectionsl = −14→18
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.191H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1108P)2 + 3.3345P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1006 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
74 parametersΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.73 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.12435 (12)1.1503 (3)0.53422 (12)0.0223 (5)
C40.23786 (16)0.8483 (5)0.61313 (15)0.0176 (6)
O20.07382 (14)0.7350 (4)0.56343 (15)0.0373 (6)
H2A0.02200.79230.53360.056*
N10.31542 (14)1.0100 (4)0.61094 (15)0.0216 (6)
H1A0.31441.16140.58080.026*
C30.26837 (17)0.6325 (5)0.66849 (17)0.0208 (6)
H30.22990.48790.68280.025*
C50.14189 (16)0.9228 (5)0.56657 (15)0.0173 (6)
C20.36767 (18)0.6681 (5)0.69974 (17)0.0245 (6)
H20.40850.55210.73930.029*
C10.39405 (17)0.9010 (6)0.66242 (18)0.0251 (6)
H10.45700.97400.67120.030*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0198 (9)0.0190 (10)0.0273 (10)−0.0004 (7)0.0008 (7)0.0048 (7)
C40.0184 (12)0.0182 (12)0.0167 (11)−0.0004 (9)0.0039 (9)−0.0005 (9)
O20.0298 (11)0.0331 (12)0.0472 (13)−0.0029 (9)0.0002 (10)0.0044 (10)
N10.0191 (10)0.0196 (11)0.0253 (11)−0.0027 (8)0.0013 (8)0.0062 (8)
C30.0210 (12)0.0198 (12)0.0216 (12)0.0003 (9)0.0035 (9)0.0020 (9)
C50.0192 (12)0.0164 (11)0.0167 (11)−0.0002 (9)0.0042 (9)−0.0008 (9)
C20.0220 (13)0.0291 (14)0.0215 (12)0.0052 (10)0.0009 (9)0.0038 (10)
C10.0174 (12)0.0318 (14)0.0256 (13)−0.0013 (10)0.0019 (9)0.0030 (11)
O1—C51.250 (3)N1—H1A0.8800
C4—N11.367 (3)C3—C21.413 (3)
C4—C31.383 (3)C3—H30.9500
C4—C51.464 (3)C2—C11.369 (4)
O2—C51.342 (3)C2—H20.9500
O2—H2A0.8400C1—H10.9500
N1—C11.354 (3)
N1—C4—C3107.8 (2)O1—C5—O2122.4 (2)
N1—C4—C5121.3 (2)O1—C5—C4121.6 (2)
C3—C4—C5130.8 (2)O2—C5—C4116.0 (2)
C5—O2—H2A109.5C1—C2—C3107.2 (2)
C1—N1—C4109.4 (2)C1—C2—H2126.4
C1—N1—H1A125.3C3—C2—H2126.4
C4—N1—H1A125.3N1—C1—C2108.6 (2)
C4—C3—C2106.9 (2)N1—C1—H1125.7
C4—C3—H3126.5C2—C1—H1125.7
C2—C3—H3126.5
C3—C4—N1—C10.7 (3)N1—C4—C5—O2171.9 (2)
C5—C4—N1—C1177.3 (2)C3—C4—C5—O2−12.3 (4)
N1—C4—C3—C2−0.2 (3)C4—C3—C2—C1−0.3 (3)
C5—C4—C3—C2−176.4 (2)C4—N1—C1—C2−0.9 (3)
N1—C4—C5—O1−10.0 (3)C3—C2—C1—N10.7 (3)
C3—C4—C5—O1165.7 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.882.222.951 (3)141
O2—H2A···O1ii0.842.162.986 (3)166
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i0.882.222.951 (3)141
O2—H2A⋯O1ii0.842.162.986 (3)166

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

Review 1.  Marine natural products.

Authors:  D John Faulkner
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 13.423

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis of axinohydantoins.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Barrios Sosa; Kenichi Yakushijin; David A Horne
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  4,5-Diaryl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylates as combretastatin A-4/lamellarin T hybrids: synthesis and evaluation as anti-mitotic and cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Martin G Banwell; Ernest Hamel; David C R Hockless; Pascal Verdier-Pinard; Anthony C Willis; David J Wong
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.641

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.