Literature DB >> 2158390

Universal precautions to prevent HIV transmission to health care workers: an economic analysis.

S R Stock1, A Gafni, R F Bloch.   

Abstract

The universal precautions recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Atlanta, for the prevention of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) transmission to health care workers are widely accepted, despite little documentation of their effectiveness and efficiency. We reviewed the evidence on the risk of HIV transmission to hospital workers and the effectiveness of the universal precautions. We also evaluated the costs of implementing the recommendations in a 450-bed acute care teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ont. On the basis of aggregated results from six prospective studies the risk of HIV seroconversion among hospital workers after a needlestick injury involving a patient known to have AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is 0.36% (upper 95% confidence limit 0.67%); the risk after skin and mucous membrane exposure to blood or other body fluids of AIDS patients is 0% (upper 95% confidence limit 0.38%). We estimated that 0.038 cases of HIV seroconversion would be prevented annually in the study hospital if the CDC recommendations were followed. The incremental cost of implementing the universal precautions was estimated to be about $315,000 per year, or over $8 million per case of HIV seroconversion prevented. If all HIV-infected workers were assumed to have AIDS within 10 years of infection the of the program would be about $565,000 per life-year saved. When less conservative, more probable assumptions were applied the best estimate of the implementation cost was $128,862,000 per case of HIV seroconversion prevented. The universal precautions implemented in the study hospital were not found to be efficacious or cost-effective. To minimize the already small risk of HIV transmission in hospitals the sources of risk of percutaneous injury should be better defined and the design of percutaneous lines, needles and surgical equipment as well as techniques improved. Preventive measures recommended on the basis of demonstrated efficacy and aimed at routes of exposure that represent true risk are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2158390      PMCID: PMC1451768     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  37 in total

1.  Needlestick and puncture wounds: definition of the problem.

Authors:  J S Reed; A C Anderson; G R Hodges
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  M H Boyle; G W Torrance; J C Sinclair; S P Horwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators.

Authors:  J A Hanley; A Lippman-Hand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Epidemiology of accidental needle-puncture wounds in hospital workers.

Authors:  F L Ruben; C W Norden; K Rockwell; E Hruska
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.378

5.  Hepatitis B in a medical center.

Authors:  J P Hansen; J A Falconer; J D Hamilton; F J Herpok
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1981-05

6.  Hepatitis B: an occupational hazard of health care facilities.

Authors:  W J Schneider
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1979-12

7.  Injuries of hospital employees from needles and sharp objects.

Authors:  J T Jacobson; J P Burke; M T Conti
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr

8.  Surveillance of health care workers exposed to blood from patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  R Marcus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  The risk of hepatitis B infection among health professionals in the United States: a review.

Authors:  D J West
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.378

10.  Medical care costs of AIDS in Massachusetts.

Authors:  G R Seage; S Landers; A Barry; J Groopman; G A Lamb; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  What do we gain from the sixth coronary heart disease drug?

Authors:  Rebecca N Warburton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-29

2.  Universal precautions not justified.

Authors:  J Hardie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Preventing HIV transmission to health care workers.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Procedure-related rate of contact of intensive care unit personnel with patient body fluids.

Authors:  M S Kristensen; E Sloth; T K Jensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Feeny; A S Detsky; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Universal precautions.

Authors:  J Righter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.