Literature DB >> 21583867

1H-Pyrazolo[4,3-g]benzothia-zol-7-amine.

José R Camacho, Teresa González.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(8)H(6)N(4)S, is almost planar [maximum deviation from the mean plane = 0.020 (1) Å for the S atom]. In the crystal, a supra-molecular three-dimensional arrangement arises from N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds and weak aromatic stacking interactions along the a axis [centroid-centroid separation = 3.582 (2) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583867      PMCID: PMC2977731          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background on DNA inter­calation agents, see: Cagnoli et al. (1968 ▶); Martínez & Chacón-García (2005 ▶); Chakrabarty et al. (2008 ▶). For further synthetic details, see: Salazar & Dorta (2004 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H6N4S M = 190.23 Monoclinic, a = 4.499 (2) Å b = 14.979 (8) Å c = 12.112 (7) Å β = 92.442 (19)° V = 815.6 (7) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.35 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.50 × 0.48 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Rigaku AFC7S Mercury diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (Jacobson, 1998 ▶) T min = 0.837, T max = 0.904 8415 measured reflections 1564 independent reflections 1356 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.027

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043 wR(F 2) = 0.117 S = 1.12 1564 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2002 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL-NT (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL-NT; molecular graphics: SHELXTL-NT and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL-NT and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012550/hb2931sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012550/hb2931Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H6N4SF(000) = 392
Mr = 190.23Dx = 1.549 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71070 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 5546 reflections
a = 4.499 (2) Åθ = 1.4–27.8°
b = 14.979 (8) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 12.112 (7) ÅT = 293 K
β = 92.442 (19)°Block, light brown
V = 815.6 (7) Å30.50 × 0.48 × 0.28 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku AFC7S Mercury diffractometer1564 independent reflections
Radiation source: Normal-focus sealed tube1356 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.027
ω scansθmax = 27.8°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (Jacobson, 1998)h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.837, Tmax = 0.904k = −17→17
8415 measured reflectionsl = −10→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.117H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.12w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0537P)2 + 0.4259P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1564 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.38 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S11.01959 (12)0.29819 (4)0.80928 (4)0.0375 (2)
N10.4558 (5)0.03847 (13)0.69844 (15)0.0469 (5)
N20.6362 (4)0.11194 (12)0.70868 (14)0.0399 (5)
H20.72750.13050.64320.048*
N30.8801 (4)0.31237 (12)1.01512 (15)0.0374 (4)
N41.2153 (5)0.42105 (13)0.95801 (16)0.0467 (5)
H61.32020.44790.89990.056*
H51.24080.44241.03450.056*
C10.3414 (6)0.02732 (16)0.79596 (19)0.0447 (6)
H10.2103−0.01830.81250.054*
C20.4424 (5)0.09335 (14)0.87253 (17)0.0364 (5)
C30.3893 (5)0.11384 (15)0.98363 (18)0.0425 (5)
H30.26000.07901.02330.051*
C40.5305 (5)0.18567 (15)1.03243 (18)0.0408 (5)
H40.49760.19961.10570.049*
C50.7267 (5)0.23892 (14)0.97160 (16)0.0352 (5)
C61.0420 (5)0.34903 (14)0.94037 (17)0.0354 (5)
C70.7767 (5)0.22046 (13)0.86132 (16)0.0319 (5)
C80.6336 (5)0.14676 (14)0.81177 (16)0.0333 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0429 (4)0.0374 (4)0.0325 (4)−0.0007 (2)0.0051 (2)0.00195 (19)
N10.0621 (14)0.0372 (11)0.0414 (11)−0.0055 (9)0.0022 (9)−0.0022 (8)
N20.0526 (12)0.0365 (10)0.0308 (10)−0.0003 (9)0.0058 (8)−0.0021 (7)
N30.0424 (11)0.0372 (10)0.0326 (10)0.0027 (8)0.0028 (8)−0.0032 (7)
N40.0574 (13)0.0421 (11)0.0405 (11)−0.0088 (9)0.0014 (9)0.0000 (8)
C10.0550 (15)0.0365 (12)0.0426 (13)−0.0047 (10)0.0028 (10)0.0023 (9)
C20.0414 (13)0.0312 (11)0.0367 (11)0.0028 (9)0.0031 (9)0.0043 (8)
C30.0489 (14)0.0417 (13)0.0375 (12)−0.0020 (10)0.0084 (10)0.0051 (9)
C40.0503 (14)0.0439 (13)0.0290 (11)0.0011 (10)0.0091 (10)0.0018 (8)
C50.0385 (12)0.0340 (11)0.0331 (11)0.0060 (9)0.0029 (8)0.0005 (8)
C60.0363 (12)0.0334 (11)0.0364 (11)0.0055 (9)−0.0002 (8)0.0019 (8)
C70.0346 (12)0.0323 (11)0.0289 (10)0.0054 (9)0.0038 (8)0.0016 (8)
C80.0384 (12)0.0312 (11)0.0303 (10)0.0083 (9)0.0011 (8)0.0007 (8)
S1—C71.734 (2)C1—C21.418 (3)
S1—C61.760 (2)C1—H10.9300
N1—C11.319 (3)C2—C81.405 (3)
N1—N21.370 (3)C2—C31.411 (3)
N2—C81.354 (3)C3—C41.371 (3)
N2—H20.9500C3—H30.9300
N3—C61.307 (3)C4—C51.419 (3)
N3—C51.391 (3)C4—H40.9300
N4—C61.343 (3)C5—C71.392 (3)
N4—H60.9529C7—C81.400 (3)
N4—H50.9822
C7—S1—C688.59 (10)C2—C3—H3120.4
C1—N1—N2105.85 (18)C3—C4—C5120.3 (2)
C8—N2—N1111.39 (18)C3—C4—H4119.9
C8—N2—H2132.7C5—C4—H4119.9
N1—N2—H2115.8N3—C5—C7115.03 (19)
C6—N3—C5110.62 (18)N3—C5—C4123.89 (19)
C6—N4—H6121.6C7—C5—C4121.1 (2)
C6—N4—H5117.1N3—C6—N4124.3 (2)
H6—N4—H5121.2N3—C6—S1115.53 (17)
N1—C1—C2111.8 (2)N4—C6—S1120.12 (16)
N1—C1—H1124.1C5—C7—C8118.54 (19)
C2—C1—H1124.1C5—C7—S1110.22 (16)
C8—C2—C3120.5 (2)C8—C7—S1131.23 (16)
C8—C2—C1103.94 (19)N2—C8—C7132.6 (2)
C3—C2—C1135.5 (2)N2—C8—C2107.05 (19)
C4—C3—C2119.2 (2)C7—C8—C2120.32 (19)
C4—C3—H3120.4
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···N3i0.951.922.864 (3)170
N4—H5···N1ii0.982.193.123 (3)158
N4—H6···N1iii0.952.093.019 (3)164
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯N3i0.951.922.864 (3)170
N4—H5⋯N1ii0.982.193.123 (3)158
N4—H6⋯N1iii0.952.093.019 (3)164

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

Review 1.  The search of DNA-intercalators as antitumoral drugs: what it worked and what did not work.

Authors:  R Martínez; L Chacón-García
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.