Literature DB >> 21583839

N-(4-Isopropoxyphen-yl)acetamide.

Min Zhang, Ran-Zhe Lu, Lu-Na Han, Wen-Bin Wei, Hai-Bo Wang.   

Abstract

In the mol-ecule of the title compound, C(11)H(15)NO(2), the planar acetamide unit [maximum deviation of 0.0014 (6) Å] is oriented at a dihedral angle of 19.68 (4)° with respect to the aromatic ring. An intra-molecular C-H⋯O inter-action results in the formation of a six-membered ring. In the crystal structure, inter-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into chains along the a axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583839      PMCID: PMC2977703          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Knesl et al. (2006 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H15NO2 M = 193.24 Orthorhombic, a = 9.3010 (19) Å b = 7.6490 (15) Å c = 31.394 (6) Å V = 2233.5 (8) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 294 K 0.30 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.977, T max = 0.992 2026 measured reflections 2026 independent reflections 1099 reflections with I > 2σ(I) 3 standard reflections frequency: 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.068 wR(F 2) = 0.202 S = 1.01 2026 reflections 127 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks D, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012665/hk2659sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012665/hk2659Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H15NO2Dx = 1.149 Mg m3
Mr = 193.24Melting point: 403K K
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 9.3010 (19) Åθ = 9–12°
b = 7.6490 (15) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 31.394 (6) ÅT = 294 K
V = 2233.5 (8) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 80.30 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 832
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1099 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.0000
graphiteθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 1.3°
ω/2θ scansh = 0→11
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = 0→9
Tmin = 0.977, Tmax = 0.992l = 0→37
2026 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
2026 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.202w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2026 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
127 parametersΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N0.5437 (3)0.2110 (3)0.52353 (8)0.0516 (7)
H0A0.46090.25640.51830.062*
O10.5722 (3)−0.0692 (3)0.68713 (7)0.0834 (8)
O20.7614 (2)0.1579 (3)0.49473 (7)0.0665 (7)
C10.5187 (7)−0.3739 (7)0.67643 (15)0.128 (2)
H1A0.5192−0.36130.64600.192*
H1B0.4231−0.35460.68700.192*
H1C0.5494−0.48970.68390.192*
C20.6254 (7)−0.2587 (7)0.74329 (13)0.1163 (17)
H2A0.6915−0.17330.75420.175*
H2B0.6577−0.37370.75100.175*
H2C0.5318−0.23850.75520.175*
C30.6181 (5)−0.2437 (6)0.69566 (12)0.0810 (12)
H3A0.7146−0.26070.68380.097*
C40.5728 (4)−0.0080 (4)0.64580 (11)0.0602 (9)
C50.6698 (3)−0.0586 (4)0.61512 (10)0.0589 (9)
H5A0.7396−0.14150.62150.071*
C60.6637 (3)0.0134 (4)0.57479 (10)0.0543 (8)
H6A0.7297−0.02210.55430.065*
C70.5608 (3)0.1378 (4)0.56435 (9)0.0470 (8)
C80.4652 (4)0.1886 (5)0.59609 (12)0.0631 (10)
H8A0.39550.27220.59000.076*
C90.4712 (4)0.1183 (5)0.63610 (11)0.0680 (10)
H9A0.40690.15550.65690.082*
C100.6390 (3)0.2191 (4)0.49183 (10)0.0515 (8)
C110.5892 (4)0.3070 (5)0.45170 (11)0.0638 (10)
H11A0.66520.30470.43100.096*
H11B0.56380.42600.45780.096*
H11C0.50690.24640.44060.096*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N0.0428 (13)0.0549 (16)0.0572 (16)0.0014 (12)−0.0018 (11)0.0035 (13)
O10.119 (2)0.0703 (17)0.0608 (16)0.0233 (16)0.0052 (14)0.0019 (13)
O20.0471 (13)0.0715 (16)0.0808 (16)0.0047 (12)0.0103 (12)0.0115 (12)
C10.198 (6)0.092 (4)0.094 (4)−0.034 (4)0.005 (4)0.003 (3)
C20.168 (5)0.107 (4)0.074 (3)0.024 (4)0.001 (3)0.022 (3)
C30.096 (3)0.069 (2)0.078 (3)0.014 (2)0.008 (2)0.011 (2)
C40.076 (2)0.0508 (19)0.054 (2)0.0052 (19)−0.0027 (17)−0.0050 (16)
C50.061 (2)0.051 (2)0.065 (2)0.0133 (17)−0.0040 (16)0.0000 (17)
C60.0534 (18)0.0518 (19)0.058 (2)0.0022 (16)0.0051 (15)−0.0014 (16)
C70.0428 (15)0.0439 (17)0.0543 (19)−0.0027 (14)−0.0004 (13)−0.0027 (14)
C80.062 (2)0.057 (2)0.071 (2)0.0136 (17)0.0049 (17)0.0004 (18)
C90.076 (2)0.064 (2)0.063 (2)0.017 (2)0.0114 (17)−0.0049 (19)
C100.0486 (17)0.0420 (18)0.064 (2)−0.0084 (15)0.0008 (15)−0.0044 (15)
C110.061 (2)0.063 (2)0.067 (2)−0.0106 (18)−0.0042 (16)0.0080 (18)
N—C101.334 (4)C4—C51.375 (4)
N—C71.407 (4)C4—C91.385 (4)
N—H0A0.8600C5—C61.382 (4)
O1—C41.379 (4)C5—H5A0.9300
O1—C31.427 (5)C6—C71.389 (4)
O2—C101.234 (4)C6—H6A0.9300
C1—C31.487 (6)C7—C81.391 (4)
C1—H1A0.9600C8—C91.367 (5)
C1—H1B0.9600C8—H8A0.9300
C1—H1C0.9600C9—H9A0.9300
C2—C31.501 (5)C10—C111.501 (4)
C2—H2A0.9600C11—H11A0.9600
C2—H2B0.9600C11—H11B0.9600
C2—H2C0.9600C11—H11C0.9600
C3—H3A0.9800
C10—N—C7128.5 (3)C4—C5—C6120.2 (3)
C10—N—H0A115.7C4—C5—H5A119.9
C7—N—H0A115.7C6—C5—H5A119.9
C4—O1—C3119.5 (3)C5—C6—C7121.2 (3)
C3—C1—H1A109.5C5—C6—H6A119.4
C3—C1—H1B109.5C7—C6—H6A119.4
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C6—C7—C8117.6 (3)
C3—C1—H1C109.5C6—C7—N124.4 (3)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C8—C7—N118.0 (3)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C9—C8—C7121.5 (3)
C3—C2—H2A109.5C9—C8—H8A119.3
C3—C2—H2B109.5C7—C8—H8A119.3
H2A—C2—H2B109.5C8—C9—C4120.3 (3)
C3—C2—H2C109.5C8—C9—H9A119.9
H2A—C2—H2C109.5C4—C9—H9A119.9
H2B—C2—H2C109.5O2—C10—N122.7 (3)
O1—C3—C1111.3 (4)O2—C10—C11121.1 (3)
O1—C3—C2105.8 (3)N—C10—C11116.2 (3)
C1—C3—C2112.4 (4)C10—C11—H11A109.5
O1—C3—H3A109.1C10—C11—H11B109.5
C1—C3—H3A109.1H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C2—C3—H3A109.1C10—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C4—O1124.5 (3)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C4—C9119.3 (3)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
O1—C4—C9116.1 (3)
C4—O1—C3—C1−65.9 (5)C10—N—C7—C6−21.2 (5)
C4—O1—C3—C2171.7 (4)C10—N—C7—C8161.2 (3)
C3—O1—C4—C5−32.2 (5)C6—C7—C8—C9−0.4 (5)
C3—O1—C4—C9150.6 (4)N—C7—C8—C9177.4 (3)
O1—C4—C5—C6−178.5 (3)C7—C8—C9—C4−0.8 (5)
C9—C4—C5—C6−1.3 (5)C5—C4—C9—C81.7 (5)
C4—C5—C6—C70.2 (5)O1—C4—C9—C8179.0 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C80.7 (5)C7—N—C10—O20.6 (5)
C5—C6—C7—N−176.9 (3)C7—N—C10—C11−179.7 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N—H0A···O2i0.862.012.869 (3)175
C6—H6A···O20.932.342.892 (4)118
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N—H0A⋯O2i0.862.012.869 (3)175
C6—H6A⋯O20.932.342.892 (4)118

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  Improved synthesis of substituted 6,7-dihydroxy-4-quinazolineamines: tandutinib, erlotinib and gefitinib.

Authors:  Petr Knesl; Dirk Röseling; Ulrich Jordis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.