Literature DB >> 21583750

Poly[di-μ(2)-azido-μ(3)-pyrazine-2-carboxyl-ato-cadmium(II)].

Cai-Yun Li1, Pei-Fan Li, Hui-Min Jin.   

Abstract

The title compound, [Cd(C(5)H(3)N(2)O(2))(N(3))](n), has been pre-pared by the reaction of pyrazine-2-carboxylic acid, cadmium(II) nitrate and sodium azide. In the structure, the Cd(II) atom is six-coordinated by two azide anions and three pyrazine-2-carboxyl-ate ligands. Each pyrazine-2-carboxyl-ate ligand bridges three Cd(II) atoms, whereas the azide ligand bridges two Cd(II) atoms, resulting in the formation of a two-dimensional metal-organic polymer developing parallel to the (100) plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583750      PMCID: PMC2977564          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For metalazide complexes, see: Mondal & Mukherjee (2008 ▶); Gu et al. (2007 ▶); Monfort et al. (2000 ▶). For the coordination modes of the azide anion, see: Shen et al. (2000 ▶). For metalazide complexes with charged ligands, see: Escuer et al. (1997 ▶). For the synthesis of high-dimensional azide compounds with negatively charged ligands, see: Liu et al. (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cd(C5H3N2O2)(N3)] M = 277.52 Monoclinic, a = 11.857 (2) Å b = 9.839 (2) Å c = 6.6250 (13) Å β = 100.33 (3)° V = 760.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.84 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.20 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.537, T max = 0.643 7718 measured reflections 1741 independent reflections 1517 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.067

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.046 wR(F 2) = 0.117 S = 1.20 1741 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.09 e Å−3 Data collection: SCXmini (Rigaku, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); data reduction: PROCESS-AUTO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012227/dn2435sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809012227/dn2435Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cd(C5H3N2O2)(N3)]F(000) = 528
Mr = 277.52Dx = 2.424 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 7230 reflections
a = 11.857 (2) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 9.839 (2) ŵ = 2.84 mm1
c = 6.6250 (13) ÅT = 293 K
β = 100.33 (3)°Block, yellow
V = 760.4 (3) Å30.2 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer1741 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1517 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.067
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)h = −15→15
Tmin = 0.537, Tmax = 0.643k = −12→12
7718 measured reflectionsl = −8→8
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.117H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.20w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0408P)2 + 2.6851P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1741 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.09 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cd10.42263 (4)0.36045 (4)0.34194 (7)0.02481 (18)
N10.3555 (5)0.1927 (5)0.5059 (8)0.0287 (12)
N20.2937 (5)0.1135 (5)0.4006 (8)0.0248 (12)
N30.2327 (6)0.0399 (7)0.3035 (10)0.0466 (17)
N40.2558 (4)0.4910 (5)0.3100 (7)0.0231 (11)
N50.0689 (5)0.6646 (7)0.1984 (10)0.0390 (15)
O10.4718 (3)0.5816 (4)0.3145 (6)0.0197 (8)
O20.4043 (4)0.7823 (4)0.1835 (6)0.0250 (9)
C10.3913 (5)0.6650 (6)0.2480 (8)0.0198 (12)
C20.2694 (5)0.6193 (6)0.2517 (8)0.0194 (12)
C30.1769 (5)0.7052 (7)0.1982 (9)0.0277 (14)
H3A0.18980.79420.16090.033*
C40.0571 (6)0.5372 (9)0.2550 (11)0.0422 (19)
H4A−0.01620.50440.25750.051*
C50.1493 (6)0.4509 (8)0.3106 (10)0.0327 (16)
H5B0.13620.36230.34940.039*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cd10.0233 (3)0.0213 (3)0.0287 (3)−0.00024 (18)0.00174 (19)0.00118 (18)
N10.038 (3)0.023 (3)0.024 (3)−0.008 (2)0.002 (2)−0.001 (2)
N20.022 (3)0.025 (3)0.027 (3)−0.003 (2)0.003 (2)0.000 (2)
N30.051 (4)0.047 (4)0.040 (3)−0.023 (3)0.001 (3)−0.004 (3)
N40.022 (3)0.025 (3)0.023 (2)−0.004 (2)0.005 (2)−0.003 (2)
N50.018 (3)0.054 (4)0.044 (3)0.002 (3)0.004 (3)−0.008 (3)
O10.014 (2)0.020 (2)0.025 (2)−0.0004 (16)0.0012 (16)0.0018 (17)
O20.023 (2)0.018 (2)0.033 (2)−0.0007 (17)0.0035 (18)0.0075 (18)
C10.018 (3)0.026 (3)0.013 (3)−0.004 (2)0.000 (2)−0.001 (2)
C20.015 (3)0.028 (3)0.014 (2)−0.001 (2)−0.001 (2)−0.002 (2)
C30.019 (3)0.031 (4)0.031 (3)0.000 (3)−0.001 (3)−0.001 (3)
C40.018 (4)0.071 (6)0.040 (4)−0.012 (3)0.011 (3)−0.010 (4)
C50.022 (3)0.043 (4)0.034 (4)−0.016 (3)0.010 (3)−0.003 (3)
Cd1—N12.202 (5)N5—C41.324 (10)
Cd1—O2i2.226 (4)N5—C31.342 (8)
Cd1—O12.268 (4)O1—C11.275 (7)
Cd1—N42.336 (5)O2—C11.250 (7)
Cd1—O1ii2.460 (4)C1—C21.517 (8)
N1—N21.203 (7)C2—C31.380 (8)
N1—Cd1iii2.286 (5)C3—H3A0.9300
N2—N31.138 (8)C4—C51.381 (11)
N4—C51.324 (8)C4—H4A0.9300
N4—C21.339 (8)C5—H5B0.9300
N1—Cd1—O2i101.42 (19)C2—N4—Cd1113.6 (4)
N1—Cd1—O1151.56 (18)C4—N5—C3115.6 (6)
O2i—Cd1—O194.12 (15)C1—O1—Cd1117.2 (4)
N1—Cd1—N1iv102.45 (15)C1—O1—Cd1ii113.3 (3)
O2i—Cd1—N1iv90.68 (18)Cd1—O1—Cd1ii104.11 (15)
O1—Cd1—N1iv101.01 (17)C1—O2—Cd1v121.1 (4)
N1—Cd1—N494.7 (2)O2—C1—O1125.6 (5)
O2i—Cd1—N4163.79 (17)O2—C1—C2117.0 (5)
O1—Cd1—N471.99 (16)O1—C1—C2117.4 (5)
N1iv—Cd1—N484.05 (18)N4—C2—C3121.3 (6)
N1—Cd1—O1ii83.47 (16)N4—C2—C1116.7 (5)
O2i—Cd1—O1ii80.03 (14)C3—C2—C1122.0 (5)
O1—Cd1—O1ii75.89 (15)N5—C3—C2122.2 (6)
N1iv—Cd1—O1ii169.88 (17)N5—C3—H3A118.9
N4—Cd1—O1ii103.82 (15)C2—C3—H3A118.9
N2—N1—Cd1115.8 (4)N5—C4—C5122.6 (6)
N2—N1—Cd1iii119.1 (4)N5—C4—H4A118.7
Cd1—N1—Cd1iii124.0 (2)C5—C4—H4A118.7
N3—N2—N1178.0 (7)N4—C5—C4121.7 (7)
C5—N4—C2116.6 (6)N4—C5—H5B119.1
C5—N4—Cd1128.9 (5)C4—C5—H5B119.1
  8 in total

1.  Ferromagnetic Ordering in a Two-Dimensional Copper Complex with Dual End-to-End and End-On Azide Bridges This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSF 29631040 and 29929001), The Major State Basic Research Development Program (Grant No. G2000077500 and No. G1998061306), and the Malaysian Government research grant R&D No. 305/pfizik/622004.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Structure and Magnetic Behavior of a New 1-D Compound with Simultaneous End-On Azido and Carboxylato Bridges. Unexpected Strong Ferromagnetic Coupling for a Cu-N-Cu Bond Angle of 111.9 degrees as a Consequence of Ligand HOMOs Countercomplementarity.

Authors:  Albert Escuer; Ramon Vicente; Franz A. Mautner; Mohamed A. S. Goher
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  1997-03-12       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  A Metamagnetic Two-Dimensional Molecular Material with Nickel(II) and Azide.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Novel 3-D framework nickel(II) complex with azide, nicotinic acid, and nicotinate(1-) as coligands: hydrothermal synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties.

Authors:  Fu-Chen Liu; Yong-Fei Zeng; Jian-Rong Li; Xian-He Bu; Hong-Jie Zhang; Joan Ribas
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Three new Cu-azido polymers and their systematic interconversion: role of the amount of the blocking amine on the structural diversity and magnetic behavior.

Authors:  Kartik Chandra Mondal; Partha Sarathi Mukherjee
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Chiral molecular ferromagnets based on copper(II) polymers with end-on azido bridges.

Authors:  Zhi-Guo Gu; You Song; Jing-Lin Zuo; Xiao-Zeng You
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.