Literature DB >> 21583689

2,2'-Dihydroxybiphenyl-3,3'-di-carb-aldehyde dioxime.

Ekaterina Golovnia, Elena V Prisyazhnaya, Turganbay S Iskenderov, Matti Haukka, Igor O Fritsky.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(14)H(12)N(2)O(4), lies across a crystallographic inversion centre situated at the mid-point of the C-C intra-annular bond. The mol-ecule is not planar, the dihedral angle between the aromatic rings being 50.1 (1)°. The oxime group is in an E position with respect to the -OH group and forms an intra-molecular O-H⋯N hydrogen bond. In the crystal structure, inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link mol-ecules into chains propagating along [001]. The crystal structure is further stabilized by inter-molecular stacking inter-actions between the rings [centroid-to-centroid distance = 3.93 (1) Å], resulting in layers parallel to the bc plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583689      PMCID: PMC2977097          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the use of oximes as chelating ligands in coordination and analytical chemistry and extraction metallurgy, see: Kukushkin et al. (1996 ▶); Chaudhuri (2003 ▶). For the use of oxime ligands to obtain polynuclear compounds in the fields of mol­ecular magnetism and supra­molecular chemistry, see: Cervera et al. (1997 ▶); Costes et al. (1998 ▶). Oxime-containing ligands have been found to efficiently stabilize high oxidation states of metal ions such as Cu(III) and Ni(III), see: Fritsky et al. (2006 ▶); Kanderal et al. (2005 ▶). For C=N and N—O bond lengths in oximes, see: Mokhir et al. (2002 ▶); Onindo et al. (1995 ▶); Sliva et al. (1997 ▶). For the synthesis of 2,2′-dihydroxy­biphenyl-3,3′-dicarbaldehyde, see: Wünnemann et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H12N2O4 M = 272.26 Monoclinic, a = 24.2780 (14) Å b = 3.9279 (4) Å c = 16.6466 (12) Å β = 129.652 (6)° V = 1222.2 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.19 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.976, T max = 0.993 4331 measured reflections 1388 independent reflections 812 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.073

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.146 S = 1.02 1388 reflections 99 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Bruker–Nonius, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶); data reduction: DENZO/SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029298/jh2095sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029298/jh2095Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H12N2O4F(000) = 568
Mr = 272.26Dx = 1.480 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 516 reflections
a = 24.2780 (14) Åθ = 4.5–27.0°
b = 3.9279 (4) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 16.6466 (12) ÅT = 120 K
β = 129.652 (6)°Block, pale-yellow
V = 1222.2 (2) Å30.19 × 0.09 × 0.06 mm
Z = 4
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer1388 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube812 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
horizontally mounted graphite crystalRint = 0.073
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 4.4°
φ scans and ω scans with κ offseth = −30→30
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)k = −5→4
Tmin = 0.976, Tmax = 0.993l = −18→21
4331 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.146H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0673P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1388 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
99 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.29 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.50535 (8)0.1656 (4)0.11701 (11)0.0286 (5)
O20.64023 (9)−0.1055 (4)0.07166 (13)0.0350 (5)
N10.60748 (10)0.0232 (5)0.11062 (14)0.0279 (5)
C10.55751 (12)0.2918 (5)0.21487 (16)0.0236 (6)
C20.53803 (11)0.4208 (6)0.27199 (16)0.0235 (6)
C30.59205 (12)0.5499 (6)0.37151 (16)0.0265 (6)
H30.57950.64390.41050.032*
C40.66275 (12)0.5455 (6)0.41490 (17)0.0269 (6)
H40.69830.63290.48320.032*
C50.68185 (12)0.4140 (6)0.35911 (16)0.0272 (6)
H50.73080.41020.38930.033*
C60.62978 (11)0.2855 (6)0.25813 (16)0.0237 (6)
C70.65242 (12)0.1435 (6)0.20269 (17)0.0265 (6)
H70.70190.14020.23580.032*
H10.5270 (14)0.081 (7)0.0923 (19)0.042 (8)*
H20.5979 (18)−0.165 (8)−0.002 (3)0.067 (9)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0229 (9)0.0387 (10)0.0217 (9)−0.0034 (7)0.0132 (8)−0.0059 (7)
O20.0324 (10)0.0468 (11)0.0296 (10)0.0008 (8)0.0217 (9)−0.0042 (8)
N10.0299 (11)0.0321 (11)0.0277 (11)0.0015 (9)0.0212 (10)−0.0001 (8)
C10.0244 (13)0.0233 (12)0.0192 (12)−0.0006 (9)0.0121 (11)0.0013 (9)
C20.0235 (12)0.0218 (12)0.0213 (11)−0.0002 (9)0.0124 (11)0.0017 (9)
C30.0306 (14)0.0266 (13)0.0231 (12)−0.0015 (10)0.0176 (11)0.0000 (10)
C40.0253 (13)0.0301 (13)0.0178 (11)−0.0044 (10)0.0103 (10)−0.0024 (9)
C50.0211 (12)0.0290 (14)0.0257 (12)−0.0018 (10)0.0123 (11)0.0011 (10)
C60.0237 (13)0.0246 (12)0.0204 (12)−0.0012 (9)0.0130 (11)0.0020 (9)
C70.0207 (12)0.0311 (13)0.0252 (12)−0.0008 (10)0.0136 (11)0.0008 (10)
O1—C11.368 (3)C3—C41.373 (3)
O1—H10.91 (3)C3—H30.9500
O2—N11.402 (2)C4—C51.376 (3)
O2—H21.00 (3)C4—H40.9500
N1—C71.276 (3)C5—C61.402 (3)
C1—C21.399 (3)C5—H50.9500
C1—C61.409 (3)C6—C71.453 (3)
C2—C31.396 (3)C7—H70.9500
C2—C2i1.490 (4)
C1—O1—H1107.9 (16)C3—C4—C5119.7 (2)
N1—O2—H2101.8 (18)C3—C4—H4120.1
C7—N1—O2112.73 (17)C5—C4—H4120.1
O1—C1—C2118.89 (19)C4—C5—C6120.7 (2)
O1—C1—C6120.46 (19)C4—C5—H5119.7
C2—C1—C6120.6 (2)C6—C5—H5119.7
C3—C2—C1118.0 (2)C5—C6—C1118.83 (19)
C3—C2—C2i120.9 (2)C5—C6—C7118.8 (2)
C1—C2—C2i121.1 (2)C1—C6—C7122.31 (19)
C4—C3—C2122.1 (2)N1—C7—C6121.6 (2)
C4—C3—H3118.9N1—C7—H7119.2
C2—C3—H3118.9C6—C7—H7119.2
O1—C1—C2—C3−179.69 (18)C4—C5—C6—C7−178.9 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C31.6 (3)O1—C1—C6—C5−179.3 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C2i0.3 (3)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.6 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C2i−178.47 (16)O1—C1—C6—C7−0.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−1.7 (3)C2—C1—C6—C7177.9 (2)
C2i—C2—C3—C4178.39 (17)O2—N1—C7—C6−179.16 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C50.8 (3)C5—C6—C7—N1−179.9 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (3)C1—C6—C7—N11.5 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C1−0.3 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N10.91 (3)1.79 (3)2.609 (2)148 (2)
O2—H2···O1ii1.00 (3)1.96 (3)2.871 (2)151 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N10.91 (3)1.79 (3)2.609 (2)148 (2)
O2—H2⋯O1i1.00 (3)1.96 (3)2.871 (2)151 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Efficient stabilization of copper(III) in tetraaza pseudo-macrocyclic oxime-and-hydrazide ligands with adjustable cavity size.

Authors:  Igor O Fritsky; Henryk Kozłowski; Olga M Kanderal; Matti Haukka; Jolanta Swiatek-Kozłowska; Elzbieta Gumienna-Kontecka; Franc Meyer
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Effect of metal ionic radius and chelate ring alternation motif on stabilization of trivalent nickel and copper in binuclear complexes with double cis-oximato bridges.

Authors:  Olga M Kanderal; Henryk Kozlowski; Agnieszka Dobosz; Jolanta Swiatek-Kozlowska; Franc Meyer; Igor O Fritsky
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 4.390

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  4-Chloro-2-((E)-{3-[1-(hydroxy-imino)eth-yl]phen-yl}imino-meth-yl)phenol.

Authors:  Li Xu; Lei Wu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-07

2.  4-Bromo-2-{(E)-3-[1-(hydroxy-imino)eth-yl]phenyl-imino-meth-yl}phenol.

Authors:  Li Xu; Lei Wu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.