Literature DB >> 21583646

Glycine methyl ester hydro-chloride.

Sérgio M F Vilela, Filipe A Almeida Paz, João P C Tomé, Verónica de Zea Bermudez, José A S Cavaleiro, João Rocha.   

Abstract

THE TITLE COMPOUND [SYSTEMATIC NAME: (methoxy-carbonyl-meth-yl)ammonium chloride], crystallizes as a salt, C(3)H(8)NO(2) (+)·Cl(-), with the charged species inter-acting mutually via strong and highly directional N(+)-H⋯Cl(-) hydrogen bonds which lead to the formation of a supra-molecular tape running parallel to the c axis. Tapes close pack in the solid state mediated by multipoint recognition synthons based on weak C-H⋯O inter-actions and van der Waals contacts between adjacent methyl groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583646      PMCID: PMC2977392          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Handelsman-Benory et al. (1995 ▶). For detailed background to the role of hydrogen bonds in the supra­molecular organization of organic crystals, see: Nangia & Desiraju (1998 ▶). For general background studies on crystal engineering approaches from our research group, see: Shi et al. (2008 ▶); Paz & Klinowski (2003 ▶); Paz et al. (2002 ▶). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C3H8NO2Cl− M = 125.55 Monoclinic, a = 8.352 (2) Å b = 12.505 (3) Å c = 5.6369 (14) Å β = 99.730 (9)° V = 580.3 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.55 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.08 × 0.02 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997 ▶) T min = 0.957, T max = 0.989 5189 measured reflections 1539 independent reflections 923 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.070

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.069 wR(F 2) = 0.184 S = 1.08 1539 reflections 66 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.05 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028414/hg2539sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028414/hg2539Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C3H8NO2+·ClF(000) = 264
Mr = 125.55Dx = 1.437 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 793 reflections
a = 8.352 (2) Åθ = 3.0–24.8°
b = 12.505 (3) ŵ = 0.55 mm1
c = 5.6369 (14) ÅT = 150 K
β = 99.730 (9)°Needle, colourless
V = 580.3 (2) Å30.08 × 0.02 × 0.02 mm
Z = 4
Bruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII diffractometer1539 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube923 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.070
φ scansθmax = 29.1°, θmin = 4.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)h = −11→11
Tmin = 0.957, Tmax = 0.989k = −17→16
5189 measured reflectionsl = −7→7
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.069Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.184H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0649P)2 + 1.246P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1539 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
66 parametersΔρmax = 1.05 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.55 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.47434 (13)0.11638 (8)0.24634 (19)0.0210 (3)
C10.7947 (5)0.0942 (3)0.8596 (8)0.0200 (10)
H1D0.78340.01550.85020.024*
H1E0.83970.11351.02800.024*
C20.9087 (5)0.1308 (3)0.6967 (8)0.0190 (9)
C31.1805 (6)0.1209 (5)0.6290 (10)0.0348 (12)
H3A1.13480.11610.45730.052*
H3B1.27330.07230.66600.052*
H3C1.21630.19440.66820.052*
N10.6341 (4)0.1443 (3)0.7897 (6)0.0178 (8)
H1A0.64520.21670.79150.027*
H1B0.56830.12460.89540.027*
H1C0.58950.12250.63900.027*
O11.0566 (4)0.0911 (3)0.7714 (6)0.0295 (8)
O20.8701 (4)0.1866 (3)0.5246 (6)0.0251 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0258 (6)0.0195 (5)0.0182 (6)−0.0065 (5)0.0049 (4)−0.0014 (5)
C10.016 (2)0.014 (2)0.030 (3)−0.0018 (17)0.0031 (17)0.0025 (17)
C20.021 (2)0.0111 (19)0.026 (3)−0.0028 (16)0.0058 (17)−0.0028 (18)
C30.020 (2)0.040 (3)0.047 (3)0.000 (2)0.013 (2)0.003 (3)
N10.0204 (19)0.0166 (18)0.017 (2)0.0018 (14)0.0050 (14)−0.0001 (14)
O10.0223 (18)0.0313 (18)0.036 (2)0.0042 (15)0.0086 (14)0.0102 (16)
O20.0268 (18)0.0239 (17)0.0253 (19)0.0024 (14)0.0065 (14)0.0065 (14)
C1—N11.472 (5)C3—H3A0.9800
C1—C21.502 (6)C3—H3B0.9800
C1—H1D0.9900C3—H3C0.9800
C1—H1E0.9900N1—H1A0.9100
C2—O21.194 (5)N1—H1B0.9100
C2—O11.332 (5)N1—H1C0.9100
C3—O11.461 (5)
N1—C1—C2110.5 (4)H3A—C3—H3B109.5
N1—C1—H1D109.6O1—C3—H3C109.5
C2—C1—H1D109.6H3A—C3—H3C109.5
N1—C1—H1E109.6H3B—C3—H3C109.5
C2—C1—H1E109.6C1—N1—H1A109.5
H1D—C1—H1E108.1C1—N1—H1B109.5
O2—C2—O1125.7 (4)H1A—N1—H1B109.5
O2—C2—C1124.2 (4)C1—N1—H1C109.5
O1—C2—C1110.1 (4)H1A—N1—H1C109.5
O1—C3—H3A109.5H1B—N1—H1C109.5
O1—C3—H3B109.5C2—O1—C3115.9 (4)
N1—C1—C2—O2−5.0 (6)O2—C2—O1—C30.9 (7)
N1—C1—C2—O1175.7 (3)C1—C2—O1—C3−179.7 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1i0.912.523.269 (4)140
N1—H1B···Cl1ii0.912.253.112 (4)158
N1—H1C···Cl10.912.263.147 (4)165
C1—H1D···Cl1iii0.992.693.448 (4)133
C1—H1E···O2i0.992.512.928 (4)105
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1i0.912.523.269 (4)140
N1—H1B⋯Cl1ii0.912.253.112 (4)158
N1—H1C⋯Cl10.912.263.147 (4)165
C1—H1D⋯Cl1iii0.992.693.448 (4)133
C1—H1E⋯O2i0.992.512.928 (4)105

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Interconvertable modular framework and layered lanthanide(III)-etidronic acid coordination polymers.

Authors:  F N Shi; L Cunha-Silva; R A Sa Ferreira; L Mafra; T Trindade; L D Carlos; F A Almeida Paz; J Rocha
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Trimethyl 2,2',2''-[1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-tri-yltris-(aza-nedi-yl)]triacetate.

Authors:  Sérgio M F Vilela; Filipe A Almeida Paz; João P C Tomé; Verónica de Zea Bermudez; José A S Cavaleiro; João Rocha
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-11-20

2.  3-Meth-oxy-3-oxopropanaminium chloride.

Authors:  Tobias Gruber; Christopher J Schofield; Amber L Thompson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-02-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.