Literature DB >> 21583609

2-Amino-6-nitro-1H-benzoimidazol-3-ium chloride.

You-Sheng Chen1, Kun Zhang, Su-Qing Zhao.   

Abstract

In the cation of the title compound, C(7)H(7)N(4)O(2) (+)·Cl(-), the benzimidazole ring system is planar with a maximum deviation of -0.019 (3) Å. In the crystal structure, C-H⋯Cl, N-H⋯Cl, and N-H⋯Cl inter-actions link the mol-ecules into a two-dimensional network. π-π contacts between benzimidazole rings [centroid-centroid distances = 3.928 (1) and 3.587 (1) Å] may further stabilize the structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583609      PMCID: PMC2977465          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H7N4O2 +·Cl− M = 214.62 Monoclinic, a = 13.969 (3) Å b = 7.8064 (19) Å c = 16.490 (4) Å β = 91.303 (3)° V = 1797.7 (7) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.40 mm−1 T = 291 K 0.12 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.953, T max = 0.961 4345 measured reflections 1580 independent reflections 1242 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041 3 standard reflections frequency: 120 min intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.096 S = 1.02 1580 reflections 127 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027342/hk2728sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027342/hk2728Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H7N4O2+·ClF(000) = 880
Mr = 214.62Dx = 1.586 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 13.969 (3) Åθ = 2.1–25.3°
b = 7.8064 (19) ŵ = 0.40 mm1
c = 16.490 (4) ÅT = 291 K
β = 91.303 (3)°Block, yellow
V = 1797.7 (7) Å30.12 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
Z = 8
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1242 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.041
graphiteθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
ω/2θ scansh = −16→16
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.953, Tmax = 0.961l = −19→13
4345 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1580 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.096H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0429P)2 + 0.969P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1580 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 0.18 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.40318 (4)0.59647 (8)0.67245 (4)0.0535 (2)
O10.38248 (13)0.6546 (3)0.39469 (12)0.0718 (6)
O20.42766 (13)0.8483 (3)0.31128 (11)0.0743 (6)
N10.61668 (12)0.7489 (2)0.63485 (10)0.0424 (5)
H1A0.58350.68400.66560.051*
N20.72946 (12)0.9189 (2)0.59344 (10)0.0403 (4)
H2A0.78050.98040.59340.048*
N30.73958 (14)0.8248 (3)0.72889 (12)0.0552 (6)
H3A0.79160.88120.73800.066*
H3B0.71500.76490.76690.066*
N40.43847 (13)0.7660 (3)0.37360 (12)0.0491 (5)
C10.69763 (15)0.8301 (3)0.65691 (13)0.0392 (5)
C20.59515 (14)0.7865 (3)0.55416 (12)0.0363 (5)
C30.66716 (14)0.8960 (3)0.52782 (13)0.0361 (5)
C40.66616 (16)0.9615 (3)0.44987 (13)0.0420 (5)
H40.71471.03320.43230.050*
C50.59021 (16)0.9163 (3)0.39925 (13)0.0432 (5)
H50.58590.95900.34660.052*
C60.52047 (15)0.8067 (3)0.42752 (13)0.0392 (5)
C70.52051 (15)0.7385 (3)0.50434 (13)0.0401 (5)
H70.47280.66440.52130.048*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0422 (4)0.0708 (4)0.0475 (4)−0.0144 (3)0.0034 (3)−0.0083 (3)
O10.0580 (12)0.0805 (13)0.0762 (13)−0.0252 (10)−0.0151 (10)0.0019 (11)
O20.0612 (12)0.1070 (16)0.0539 (12)−0.0053 (11)−0.0168 (9)0.0130 (11)
N10.0447 (11)0.0431 (11)0.0393 (11)−0.0091 (9)0.0011 (8)0.0035 (8)
N20.0328 (10)0.0461 (11)0.0419 (10)−0.0076 (8)−0.0012 (8)0.0000 (8)
N30.0523 (13)0.0663 (14)0.0466 (12)−0.0117 (10)−0.0096 (10)0.0075 (10)
N40.0387 (11)0.0593 (13)0.0491 (12)0.0016 (10)−0.0039 (9)−0.0090 (10)
C10.0351 (11)0.0413 (12)0.0411 (13)0.0005 (9)−0.0013 (9)−0.0016 (10)
C20.0357 (11)0.0366 (11)0.0367 (12)0.0003 (9)0.0019 (9)−0.0012 (9)
C30.0311 (11)0.0368 (11)0.0405 (12)0.0005 (9)0.0022 (9)−0.0035 (9)
C40.0372 (12)0.0445 (13)0.0446 (13)−0.0050 (10)0.0064 (10)0.0019 (10)
C50.0430 (13)0.0479 (13)0.0387 (12)0.0007 (10)0.0026 (10)0.0006 (10)
C60.0364 (12)0.0420 (12)0.0391 (12)0.0023 (9)−0.0021 (9)−0.0063 (10)
C70.0362 (12)0.0393 (12)0.0448 (13)−0.0059 (9)0.0039 (10)−0.0051 (10)
N1—H1A0.8600C2—C71.365 (3)
N2—H2A0.8600C3—N21.385 (3)
N3—H3A0.8600C3—C41.383 (3)
N3—H3B0.8600C4—C51.381 (3)
N4—O11.225 (3)C4—H40.9300
N4—O21.219 (2)C5—C61.385 (3)
C1—N11.340 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—N21.340 (3)C6—C71.374 (3)
C1—N31.312 (3)C6—N41.469 (3)
C2—N11.389 (3)C7—H70.9300
C2—C31.397 (3)
C1—N1—C2108.84 (17)C7—C2—C3121.8 (2)
C1—N1—H1A125.6N2—C3—C2106.28 (18)
C2—N1—H1A125.6C4—C3—N2132.2 (2)
C1—N2—C3109.26 (17)C4—C3—C2121.6 (2)
C1—N2—H2A125.4C3—C4—H4121.4
C3—N2—H2A125.4C5—C4—C3117.3 (2)
C1—N3—H3A120.0C5—C4—H4121.4
C1—N3—H3B120.0C4—C5—C6119.4 (2)
H3A—N3—H3B120.0C4—C5—H5120.3
O1—N4—C6118.4 (2)C6—C5—H5120.3
O2—N4—O1123.1 (2)C5—C6—N4118.3 (2)
O2—N4—C6118.5 (2)C7—C6—N4117.27 (19)
N2—C1—N1109.02 (18)C7—C6—C5124.3 (2)
N3—C1—N1126.0 (2)C2—C7—C6115.6 (2)
N3—C1—N2125.0 (2)C2—C7—H7122.2
N1—C2—C3106.60 (18)C6—C7—H7122.2
C7—C2—N1131.6 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7···Cl10.932.753.436 (2)132
N1—H1A···Cl10.862.613.2830 (19)135
N1—H1A···Cl1i0.862.763.4102 (19)134
N3—H3A···Cl1ii0.862.553.269 (2)142
N2—H2A···Cl1ii0.862.313.0601 (19)145
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C7—H7⋯Cl10.932.753.436 (2)132
N1—H1A⋯Cl10.862.613.2830 (19)135
N1—H1A⋯Cl1i0.862.763.4102 (19)134
N3—H3A⋯Cl1ii0.862.553.269 (2)142
N2—H2A⋯Cl1ii0.862.313.0601 (19)145

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  2-[3-(1,3-Benzothia-zol-2-yl)-2,2-di-methyl-prop-yl]-2-methyl-2,3-di-hydro-1,3-benzothia-zole.

Authors:  Sammer Yousuf; Hina Siddiqui; Rabia Farooq; M Iqbal Choudhary
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-07-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.