Literature DB >> 21583538

(E)-Methyl 2,6-dichloro-N-cyano-benzimidate.

Xiao-Ai Wu, Ping Yin, Ling He, Zi-Cheng Li, Wen-Cai Huang.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(9)H(6)Cl(2)N(2)O, displays an E conformation about the C=N double bond. The N-cyano-imidate fragment is substanti-ally planar [maximum deviation 0.010 (4) Å] and perpendicular to the benzene ring [dihedral angle = 88.50 (14)°]. In the crystal packing, inter-molecular Cl⋯Cl inter-actions [3.490 (2) Å] are observed.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583538      PMCID: PMC2977164          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis of substituted cyano­imidates, see: Huffman & Schaefer (1963 ▶). For the crystal structures of compounds containing the N-cyano­imidate fragment, see: Zöllinger et al. (2006 ▶); Ponomareva et al. (1995 ▶); Jäger et al. (1996 ▶). For details of halogenhalogen inter­actions, see: Desiraju & Parthasarathy (1989 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H6Cl2N2O M = 229.06 Monoclinic, a = 21.199 (4) Å b = 8.548 (3) Å c = 15.005 (4) Å β = 128.49 (4)° V = 2128.2 (16) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.58 mm−1 T = 291 K 0.52 × 0.46 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: spherical (WinGX; Farrugia, 1999 ▶) T min = 0.754, T max = 0.855 2116 measured reflections 1948 independent reflections 1167 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.016 3 standard reflections every 120 reflections intensity decay: 3.8%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.054 wR(F 2) = 0.170 S = 1.04 1948 reflections 129 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3 Data collection: DIFRAC (Gabe & White, 1993 ▶); cell refinement: DIFRAC; data reduction: NRCVAX (Gabe et al., 1989 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026452/rz2343sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026452/rz2343Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H6Cl2N2OF(000) = 928
Mr = 229.06Dx = 1.430 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 28 reflections
a = 21.199 (4) Åθ = 4.8–9.2°
b = 8.548 (3) ŵ = 0.58 mm1
c = 15.005 (4) ÅT = 291 K
β = 128.49 (4)°Block, colourless
V = 2128.2 (16) Å30.52 × 0.46 × 0.28 mm
Z = 8
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1167 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.016
graphiteθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.5°
ω/2θ scansh = −25→17
Absorption correction: for a sphere (WinGX; Farrugia, 1999)k = 0→10
Tmin = 0.754, Tmax = 0.855l = −18→18
2116 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 reflections
1948 independent reflections intensity decay: 3.8%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.170w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1053P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1948 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
129 parametersΔρmin = −0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0069 (15)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.54862 (5)0.67130 (14)0.65350 (8)0.0881 (5)
Cl20.24528 (6)0.72469 (18)0.26898 (9)0.1121 (6)
O10.36902 (14)0.4760 (2)0.5066 (2)0.0672 (7)
N10.35148 (15)0.7020 (3)0.5663 (2)0.0563 (7)
N20.3600 (2)0.9913 (4)0.5784 (3)0.0866 (10)
C10.40050 (16)0.7037 (3)0.4547 (2)0.0472 (7)
C20.48117 (18)0.7300 (3)0.5135 (3)0.0545 (8)
C30.5094 (2)0.8077 (4)0.4632 (3)0.0675 (9)
H30.56420.82590.50390.081*
C40.4550 (3)0.8571 (4)0.3523 (3)0.0745 (10)
H40.47350.90860.31790.089*
C50.3742 (2)0.8318 (4)0.2917 (3)0.0750 (10)
H50.33790.86640.21690.090*
C60.3471 (2)0.7542 (4)0.3432 (3)0.0613 (9)
C70.37157 (16)0.6295 (3)0.5129 (2)0.0486 (7)
C80.3474 (3)0.3932 (4)0.5685 (4)0.0930 (13)
H8A0.38810.41020.64870.139*
H8B0.34330.28330.55250.139*
H8C0.29660.43120.54530.139*
C90.3568 (2)0.8581 (4)0.5699 (3)0.0619 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0583 (5)0.1217 (9)0.0646 (6)0.0019 (5)0.0285 (5)0.0127 (5)
Cl20.0589 (6)0.1721 (13)0.0731 (7)−0.0024 (6)0.0252 (5)0.0231 (7)
O10.0903 (16)0.0367 (12)0.0958 (17)0.0011 (10)0.0684 (15)0.0009 (10)
N10.0733 (17)0.0436 (14)0.0707 (16)−0.0010 (11)0.0540 (15)0.0000 (11)
N20.129 (3)0.0544 (18)0.122 (3)−0.0121 (17)0.100 (3)−0.0177 (17)
C10.0566 (16)0.0401 (14)0.0550 (16)0.0025 (12)0.0397 (14)−0.0008 (12)
C20.0587 (17)0.0537 (17)0.0574 (17)0.0016 (13)0.0393 (15)−0.0039 (13)
C30.0639 (19)0.070 (2)0.087 (2)−0.0075 (16)0.056 (2)−0.0115 (18)
C40.103 (3)0.069 (2)0.090 (3)0.000 (2)0.079 (2)0.0017 (19)
C50.096 (3)0.078 (2)0.066 (2)0.013 (2)0.058 (2)0.0132 (18)
C60.0620 (18)0.068 (2)0.0564 (18)0.0022 (15)0.0382 (16)0.0003 (15)
C70.0502 (15)0.0413 (15)0.0535 (16)0.0004 (12)0.0319 (13)−0.0001 (12)
C80.123 (3)0.050 (2)0.144 (4)−0.004 (2)0.101 (3)0.014 (2)
C90.080 (2)0.055 (2)0.076 (2)−0.0076 (16)0.0612 (19)−0.0101 (16)
Cl1—C21.724 (3)C2—C31.389 (4)
Cl2—C61.724 (4)C3—C41.374 (5)
O1—C71.314 (3)C3—H30.9300
O1—C81.451 (4)C4—C51.367 (5)
N1—C71.278 (4)C4—H40.9300
N1—C91.338 (4)C5—C61.385 (5)
N2—C91.143 (4)C5—H50.9300
C1—C21.370 (4)C8—H8A0.9600
C1—C61.382 (4)C8—H8B0.9600
C1—C71.486 (4)C8—H8C0.9600
C7—O1—C8117.2 (3)C4—C5—H5120.4
C7—N1—C9117.1 (3)C6—C5—H5120.4
C2—C1—C6118.8 (3)C1—C6—C5120.9 (3)
C2—C1—C7119.9 (3)C1—C6—Cl2119.2 (3)
C6—C1—C7121.3 (3)C5—C6—Cl2119.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3121.1 (3)N1—C7—O1121.0 (3)
C1—C2—Cl1119.5 (2)N1—C7—C1125.6 (2)
C3—C2—Cl1119.4 (2)O1—C7—C1113.4 (2)
C4—C3—C2119.0 (3)O1—C8—H8A109.5
C4—C3—H3120.5O1—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—H3120.5H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C5—C4—C3121.1 (3)O1—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—H4119.5H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C3—C4—H4119.5H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C5—C6119.2 (3)N2—C9—N1174.8 (4)
C6—C1—C2—C30.8 (4)C7—C1—C6—Cl2−2.1 (4)
C7—C1—C2—C3−176.1 (3)C4—C5—C6—C10.6 (5)
C6—C1—C2—Cl1178.8 (2)C4—C5—C6—Cl2178.7 (3)
C7—C1—C2—Cl11.9 (4)C9—N1—C7—O1179.2 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.6 (5)C9—N1—C7—C10.2 (4)
Cl1—C2—C3—C4−178.6 (3)C8—O1—C7—N1−3.7 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C50.4 (5)C8—O1—C7—C1175.4 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.4 (5)C2—C1—C7—N189.7 (4)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.8 (5)C6—C1—C7—N1−87.1 (4)
C7—C1—C6—C5176.0 (3)C2—C1—C7—O1−89.4 (3)
C2—C1—C6—Cl2−178.9 (2)C6—C1—C7—O193.8 (3)
  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Total synthesis of the cytostatic marine natural product dibromophakellstatin via three-component imidazolidinone anellation.

Authors:  Michael Zöllinger; Peter Mayer; Thomas Lindel
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.354

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.