Literature DB >> 21583240

Propyl-amine-borane.

Graeme J Gainsford1, Mark E Bowden.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(3)H(12)BN, was solved using data collected from a multiple crystal (note incomplete data shell). The cell packing is dominated by bifurcated attractive N-H(δ+)⋯(δ-)H-B inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583240      PMCID: PMC2969591          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680901887X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to our studies of hydrogen storage materials and the synthesis: see Bowden et al. (2007 ▶, 2008 ▶). For other H3B–N-containing boranes, see: Alston et al. (1985 ▶); Spielmann et al. (2008 ▶). For bond lengths and angles in boranes, see: Ting et al. (1972 ▶); Klooster et al. (1999 ▶); For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C3H12BN M = 72.95 Monoclinic, a = 9.173 (4) Å b = 8.638 (3) Å c = 7.360 (3) Å β = 97.892 (8)° V = 577.7 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.05 mm−1 T = 93 K 0.45 × 0.25 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: none 846 measured reflections 846 independent reflections 503 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.060

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.051 wR(F 2) = 0.138 S = 1.00 846 reflections 57 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.14 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: RLATT (Bruker, 2004 ▶) and SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680901887X/bt2953sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680901887X/bt2953Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C3H12BNF(000) = 168
Mr = 72.95Dx = 0.839 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1112 reflections
a = 9.173 (4) Åθ = 3.3–26.4°
b = 8.638 (3) ŵ = 0.05 mm1
c = 7.360 (3) ÅT = 93 K
β = 97.892 (8)°Plate, colourless
V = 577.7 (4) Å30.45 × 0.25 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4
Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer503 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.060
graphiteθmax = 25.1°, θmin = 3.7°
Detector resolution: 8.192 pixels mm-1h = −10→10
φ and ω scansk = 0→10
846 measured reflectionsl = 0→8
846 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.138H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0567P)2 + 0.1469P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
846 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
57 parametersΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.14 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.57394 (18)0.52001 (19)0.2744 (2)0.0238 (5)
H80.56920.59710.19400.029*
H90.59540.56100.3860.029*
C10.6964 (2)0.4155 (2)0.2415 (3)0.0257 (6)
H60.67370.37050.12380.031*
H70.70380.33450.32880.031*
C20.8429 (2)0.4958 (3)0.2528 (3)0.0322 (7)
H40.86750.53730.3700.039*
H50.83530.57790.16900.039*
C30.9647 (3)0.3874 (3)0.2123 (4)0.0451 (8)
H10.97270.30090.29920.068*
H21.05820.44390.22450.068*
H30.94180.34750.08700.068*
B10.4156 (3)0.4415 (3)0.2603 (3)0.0270 (6)
H100.33300.52970.29370.038 (4)*
H110.41960.34250.36030.038 (4)*
H120.38250.39690.11690.038 (4)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0366 (11)0.0151 (9)0.0210 (10)−0.0006 (7)0.0080 (8)−0.0003 (7)
C10.0373 (13)0.0181 (11)0.0223 (12)0.0025 (9)0.0066 (9)0.0006 (8)
C20.0389 (15)0.0311 (13)0.0268 (13)0.0016 (11)0.0053 (10)0.0013 (10)
C30.0395 (16)0.0542 (17)0.0432 (16)0.0078 (13)0.0109 (12)0.0059 (12)
B10.0372 (15)0.0226 (13)0.0216 (13)−0.0017 (11)0.0056 (10)−0.0002 (9)
N1—C11.487 (3)C2—H40.9359
N1—B11.593 (3)C2—H50.9359
N1—H80.8880C3—H10.9800
N1—H90.8880C3—H20.9800
C1—C21.504 (3)C3—H30.9800
C1—H60.9465B1—H101.1255
C1—H70.9465B1—H111.1255
C2—C31.518 (3)B1—H121.1255
C1—N1—B1115.68 (17)C1—C2—H5109.1
C1—N1—H8108.4C3—C2—H5109.1
B1—N1—H8108.4H4—C2—H5107.9
C1—N1—H9108.4C2—C3—H1109.5
B1—N1—H9108.4C2—C3—H2109.5
H8—N1—H9107.4H1—C3—H2109.5
N1—C1—C2113.60 (17)C2—C3—H3109.5
N1—C1—H6108.8H1—C3—H3109.5
C2—C1—H6108.8H2—C3—H3109.5
N1—C1—H7108.8N1—B1—H10109.5
C2—C1—H7108.8N1—B1—H11109.5
H6—C1—H7107.7H10—B1—H11109.5
C1—C2—C3112.4 (2)N1—B1—H12109.5
C1—C2—H4109.1H10—B1—H12109.5
C3—C2—H4109.1H11—B1—H12109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H8···H11i0.892.162.96149
N1—H9···H11ii0.892.072.93163
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H8⋯H11i0.892.162.96149
N1—H9⋯H11ii0.892.072.93163

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Calcium amidoborane hydrogen storage materials: crystal structures of decomposition products.

Authors:  Jan Spielmann; Georg Jansen; Heinz Bandmann; Sjoerd Harder
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Probing the second dehydrogenation step in ammonia-borane dehydrocoupling: characterization and reactivity of the key intermediate, B-(cyclotriborazanyl)amine-borane.

Authors:  Hassan A Kalviri; Felix Gärtner; Gang Ye; Ilia Korobkov; R Tom Baker
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 9.825

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.