Literature DB >> 21583153

cis-Cyclo-hexane-1,4-dicarboxylic acid.

Yan-Qin Wang1, Jia-Bao Weng.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(12)O(4), the two carboxyl groups are on the same side of the cyclohexane ring and the ring adopts a chair conformation. Adjacent mol-ecules related by an inversion centre are linked by pairs of O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a zigzag chain along [1].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583153      PMCID: PMC2969648          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Bi et al. (2003 ▶, 2004 ▶); Chen et al. (2006 ▶); Du et al. (2006 ▶); Dunitz & Strickler (1966 ▶); Kurmoo et al. (2003 ▶, 2006 ▶); Luger et al. (1972 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H12O4 M = 172.18 Triclinic, a = 5.2912 (6) Å b = 6.2611 (6) Å c = 13.1851 (18) Å α = 82.505 (10)° β = 80.309 (11)° γ = 81.875 (10)° V = 423.70 (9) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.24 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.979, T max = 0.989 9807 measured reflections 1925 independent reflections 1222 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.038

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.055 wR(F 2) = 0.129 S = 1.05 1925 reflections 118 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016110/is2399sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016110/is2399Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H12O4Z = 2
Mr = 172.18F(000) = 184
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.350 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.2912 (6) ÅCell parameters from 3560 reflections
b = 6.2611 (6) Åθ = 2.6–26.9°
c = 13.1851 (18) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
α = 82.505 (10)°T = 296 K
β = 80.309 (11)°Plate, colorless
γ = 81.875 (10)°0.24 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
V = 423.70 (9) Å3
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1925 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1222 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.038
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.989k = −7→8
9807 measured reflectionsl = −17→17
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.129w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.038P)2 + 0.2496P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1925 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
118 parametersΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.057 (12)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.4359 (3)0.5154 (3)0.88398 (12)0.0583 (5)
O20.2703 (4)0.2964 (3)1.01503 (13)0.0620 (5)
O30.7370 (4)−0.1284 (3)0.57741 (15)0.0709 (6)
O40.8260 (3)0.2120 (3)0.55122 (14)0.0632 (5)
C10.2929 (4)0.3798 (3)0.91784 (16)0.0386 (5)
C20.1278 (4)0.2898 (4)0.85544 (16)0.0420 (5)
H2−0.04880.30210.89320.050*
C30.2176 (4)0.0476 (3)0.84796 (17)0.0457 (6)
H3A0.2410−0.02400.91610.055*
H3B0.0853−0.01740.82420.055*
C40.1185 (4)0.4153 (4)0.74843 (17)0.0493 (6)
H4A−0.02640.37820.72080.059*
H4B0.08780.56940.75570.059*
C50.4695 (4)0.0121 (3)0.77409 (16)0.0411 (5)
H5A0.5175−0.14200.76940.049*
H5B0.60560.06640.80060.049*
C60.3638 (4)0.3713 (4)0.67093 (17)0.0457 (6)
H6A0.33500.43960.60280.055*
H6B0.50290.43460.69070.055*
C70.4420 (4)0.1286 (3)0.66664 (16)0.0411 (5)
H70.30280.07100.64230.049*
C80.6862 (4)0.0769 (4)0.59270 (16)0.0432 (5)
H10.369 (7)0.355 (6)1.048 (3)0.106 (12)*
H80.898 (8)−0.163 (6)0.526 (3)0.128 (13)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0785 (12)0.0610 (11)0.0431 (9)−0.0335 (10)−0.0145 (8)−0.0002 (8)
O20.0795 (13)0.0717 (12)0.0413 (10)−0.0360 (10)−0.0111 (9)0.0020 (8)
O30.0759 (13)0.0525 (11)0.0741 (13)−0.0054 (9)0.0251 (10)−0.0191 (9)
O40.0571 (11)0.0595 (11)0.0685 (12)−0.0124 (9)0.0167 (9)−0.0190 (9)
C10.0371 (11)0.0377 (11)0.0396 (12)−0.0004 (9)−0.0016 (9)−0.0091 (9)
C20.0299 (10)0.0512 (13)0.0452 (12)−0.0048 (9)0.0017 (9)−0.0163 (10)
C30.0454 (12)0.0447 (13)0.0476 (13)−0.0145 (10)0.0045 (10)−0.0131 (10)
C40.0422 (12)0.0544 (14)0.0531 (14)0.0066 (10)−0.0150 (10)−0.0168 (11)
C50.0437 (12)0.0358 (11)0.0422 (12)−0.0034 (9)0.0003 (9)−0.0084 (9)
C60.0490 (13)0.0490 (13)0.0378 (12)0.0017 (10)−0.0098 (10)−0.0038 (10)
C70.0377 (11)0.0491 (13)0.0383 (11)−0.0058 (9)−0.0051 (9)−0.0122 (9)
C80.0450 (12)0.0483 (14)0.0366 (11)−0.0024 (10)−0.0057 (9)−0.0097 (10)
O1—C11.209 (2)C3—H3B0.9700
O2—C11.312 (3)C4—C61.527 (3)
O2—H10.88 (4)C4—H4A0.9700
O3—C81.310 (3)C4—H4B0.9700
O3—H81.01 (4)C5—C71.526 (3)
O4—C81.217 (3)C5—H5A0.9700
C1—C21.503 (3)C5—H5B0.9700
C2—C41.528 (3)C6—C71.523 (3)
C2—C31.534 (3)C6—H6A0.9700
C2—H20.9800C6—H6B0.9700
C3—C51.520 (3)C7—C81.505 (3)
C3—H3A0.9700C7—H70.9800
C1—O2—H1110 (2)H4A—C4—H4B107.6
C8—O3—H8114 (2)C3—C5—C7110.71 (18)
O1—C1—O2121.6 (2)C3—C5—H5A109.5
O1—C1—C2124.7 (2)C7—C5—H5A109.5
O2—C1—C2113.66 (19)C3—C5—H5B109.5
C1—C2—C4113.11 (18)C7—C5—H5B109.5
C1—C2—C3109.99 (18)H5A—C5—H5B108.1
C4—C2—C3111.41 (17)C7—C6—C4111.18 (19)
C1—C2—H2107.3C7—C6—H6A109.4
C4—C2—H2107.3C4—C6—H6A109.4
C3—C2—H2107.3C7—C6—H6B109.4
C5—C3—C2111.67 (17)C4—C6—H6B109.4
C5—C3—H3A109.3H6A—C6—H6B108.0
C2—C3—H3A109.3C8—C7—C6113.13 (18)
C5—C3—H3B109.3C8—C7—C5109.85 (18)
C2—C3—H3B109.3C6—C7—C5111.08 (17)
H3A—C3—H3B107.9C8—C7—H7107.5
C6—C4—C2114.13 (18)C6—C7—H7107.5
C6—C4—H4A108.7C5—C7—H7107.5
C2—C4—H4A108.7O4—C8—O3122.7 (2)
C6—C4—H4B108.7O4—C8—C7123.5 (2)
C2—C4—H4B108.7O3—C8—C7113.8 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C4−10.6 (3)C2—C4—C6—C751.0 (2)
O2—C1—C2—C4169.74 (18)C4—C6—C7—C8−178.86 (18)
O1—C1—C2—C3114.7 (2)C4—C6—C7—C5−54.8 (2)
O2—C1—C2—C3−65.0 (2)C3—C5—C7—C8−175.50 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C5−74.0 (2)C3—C5—C7—C658.6 (2)
C4—C2—C3—C552.3 (2)C6—C7—C8—O49.4 (3)
C1—C2—C4—C674.9 (2)C5—C7—C8—O4−115.3 (2)
C3—C2—C4—C6−49.6 (2)C6—C7—C8—O3−171.16 (19)
C2—C3—C5—C7−57.3 (2)C5—C7—C8—O364.1 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1···O1i0.88 (4)1.81 (4)2.684 (2)178 (4)
O3—H8···O4ii1.01 (4)1.65 (4)2.658 (2)175 (4)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H1⋯O1i0.88 (4)1.81 (4)2.684 (2)178 (4)
O3—H8⋯O4ii1.01 (4)1.65 (4)2.658 (2)175 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Reversible guest exchange and ferrimagnetism (T(C) = 60.5 K) in a porous cobalt(II)-hydroxide layer structure pillared with trans-1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate.

Authors:  Mohamedally Kurmoo; Hitoshi Kumagai; Suzanne M Hughes; Cameron J Kepert
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Isomer separation, conformation control of flexible cyclohexanedicarboxylate ligand in cadmium complexes.

Authors:  Wenhua Bi; Rong Cao; Daofeng Sun; Daqiang Yuan; Xing Li; Yanqin Wang; Xiaoju Li; Maochun Hong
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Metal-organic frameworks from homometallic chains of nickel(II) and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate connectors: ferrimagnet-ferromagnet transformation.

Authors:  Mohamedally Kurmoo; Hitoshi Kumagai; Motoko Akita-Tanaka; Katsuya Inoue; Seishi Takagi
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 5.165

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Transition Metal Coordination Polymers with Trans-1,4-Cyclohexanedicarboxylate: Acidity-Controlled Synthesis, Structures and Properties.

Authors:  Pavel A Demakov; Artem S Bogomyakov; Artem S Urlukov; Aleksandra Yu Andreeva; Denis G Samsonenko; Danil N Dybtsev; Vladimir P Fedin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.