Literature DB >> 21583140

1,3-Dihydr-oxy-2-(hydroxy-meth-yl)propan-2-aminium 2,2-dichloro-acetate.

Yan-Hong Yu, Kun Qian.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(4)H(12)NO(3) (+)·C(2)HCl(2)O(2) (-), was obtained from dichloro-acetic acid and 2-amino-2-(hydroxy-meth-yl)propane-1,3-diol. In the crystal structure, the cations and anions are connected by inter-molecular N-H⋯O and O-H⋯O hydrogen bonding, forming a two-dimensional array parallel to (001). The crystal used for analysis was a merohedral twin, as indicated by the Flack parameter of 0.67 (6).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583140      PMCID: PMC2969592          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the engineering of organic crystals for quadratic non-linear optics, see: Etter & Frankenbach (1989 ▶); Yaghi et al. (1997 ▶). For hydrogen-bond networks, see: Etter (1990 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H12NO3C2HCl2O2 M = 250.07 Monoclinic, a = 8.6231 (17) Å b = 6.1376 (12) Å c = 9.898 (2) Å β = 97.03 (3)° V = 519.92 (18) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.62 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.22 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.875, T max = 0.929 4914 measured reflections 2044 independent reflections 1951 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.025

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.031 wR(F 2) = 0.069 S = 1.10 2044 reflections 130 parameters 3 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 920 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.67 (6) Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016626/dn2442sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016626/dn2442Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H12NO3+·C2HCl2O2F(000) = 260
Mr = 250.07Dx = 1.597 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 735 reflections
a = 8.6231 (17) Åθ = 2.8–27.5°
b = 6.1376 (12) ŵ = 0.62 mm1
c = 9.898 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 97.03 (3)°Prism, colourless
V = 519.92 (18) Å30.22 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer2044 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1951 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.025
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.3°
ω scansh = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.875, Tmax = 0.929l = −12→12
4914 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.069w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0218P)2 + 0.166P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2044 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
130 parametersΔρmin = −0.25 e Å3
3 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 920 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.67 (6)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.86491 (9)0.39154 (15)0.00483 (7)0.0630 (2)
Cl20.70850 (10)0.03942 (11)0.13016 (8)0.0598 (2)
C10.6938 (3)0.3135 (4)0.0737 (2)0.0342 (5)
H10.60460.32630.00260.041*
C20.6675 (2)0.4656 (4)0.1919 (2)0.0282 (5)
C30.2265 (2)0.2569 (3)0.3756 (2)0.0215 (4)
C40.3748 (2)0.1471 (3)0.3394 (2)0.0248 (4)
H4A0.35400.08270.24960.030*
H4B0.45580.25620.33650.030*
C50.0883 (2)0.0986 (3)0.3577 (2)0.0249 (4)
H5A0.05430.08010.26130.030*
H5B0.1226−0.04230.39440.030*
C60.1911 (2)0.4607 (3)0.2892 (2)0.0270 (4)
H6A0.18410.42150.19370.032*
H6B0.09050.51880.30580.032*
N10.25465 (19)0.3243 (3)0.52217 (16)0.0221 (3)
H1A0.34700.39030.53820.033*
H1B0.25400.20700.57500.033*
H1C0.17970.41560.54030.033*
O10.54454 (19)0.5709 (3)0.17435 (18)0.0444 (4)
O20.76863 (19)0.4708 (3)0.29336 (16)0.0403 (4)
O30.42905 (16)−0.0160 (2)0.43407 (15)0.0306 (4)
H30.3857−0.12810.40710.046*
O40.30642 (17)0.6233 (2)0.31776 (17)0.0336 (4)
H40.38050.59590.27590.050*
O5−0.04042 (15)0.1704 (3)0.42311 (15)0.0274 (3)
H5−0.09310.25640.37350.041*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0535 (4)0.0984 (7)0.0405 (4)−0.0075 (4)0.0196 (3)−0.0042 (4)
Cl20.0872 (5)0.0321 (3)0.0549 (4)−0.0001 (4)−0.0123 (4)−0.0081 (3)
C10.0339 (12)0.0377 (13)0.0292 (11)0.0008 (10)−0.0040 (9)−0.0007 (10)
C20.0274 (11)0.0271 (10)0.0304 (11)−0.0002 (10)0.0048 (9)0.0064 (9)
C30.0185 (9)0.0225 (10)0.0233 (10)−0.0014 (8)0.0018 (8)0.0011 (8)
C40.0213 (10)0.0248 (11)0.0288 (11)0.0005 (9)0.0052 (9)0.0000 (9)
C50.0191 (9)0.0233 (11)0.0324 (11)−0.0007 (8)0.0029 (8)−0.0030 (9)
C60.0247 (10)0.0227 (10)0.0332 (11)0.0007 (9)0.0017 (9)0.0044 (9)
N10.0180 (7)0.0224 (8)0.0259 (9)0.0000 (7)0.0031 (7)−0.0006 (7)
O10.0347 (9)0.0503 (11)0.0494 (10)0.0142 (8)0.0097 (8)0.0129 (9)
O20.0424 (9)0.0425 (10)0.0337 (9)0.0120 (8)−0.0048 (7)−0.0105 (7)
O30.0238 (7)0.0236 (8)0.0433 (9)0.0036 (6)−0.0002 (7)0.0001 (7)
O40.0293 (8)0.0219 (7)0.0510 (10)−0.0038 (6)0.0105 (7)0.0024 (7)
O50.0179 (7)0.0308 (8)0.0337 (8)−0.0002 (6)0.0043 (6)0.0027 (6)
Cl1—C11.765 (2)C5—O51.421 (2)
Cl2—C11.773 (3)C5—H5A0.9700
C1—C21.536 (3)C5—H5B0.9700
C1—H10.9800C6—O41.413 (3)
C2—O11.236 (3)C6—H6A0.9700
C2—O21.247 (3)C6—H6B0.9700
C3—N11.499 (3)N1—H1A0.8900
C3—C61.525 (3)N1—H1B0.8900
C3—C41.527 (3)N1—H1C0.8900
C3—C51.531 (3)O3—H30.8119
C4—O31.411 (2)O4—H40.8205
C4—H4A0.9700O5—H50.8200
C4—H4B0.9700
C2—C1—Cl1109.75 (16)O5—C5—C3112.99 (16)
C2—C1—Cl2110.36 (16)O5—C5—H5A109.0
Cl1—C1—Cl2110.39 (14)C3—C5—H5A109.0
C2—C1—H1108.8O5—C5—H5B109.0
Cl1—C1—H1108.8C3—C5—H5B109.0
Cl2—C1—H1108.8H5A—C5—H5B107.8
O1—C2—O2127.1 (2)O4—C6—C3112.27 (17)
O1—C2—C1114.5 (2)O4—C6—H6A109.2
O2—C2—C1118.38 (19)C3—C6—H6A109.2
N1—C3—C6108.33 (17)O4—C6—H6B109.2
N1—C3—C4107.93 (16)C3—C6—H6B109.2
C6—C3—C4110.28 (16)H6A—C6—H6B107.9
N1—C3—C5108.57 (16)C3—N1—H1A109.5
C6—C3—C5110.83 (16)C3—N1—H1B109.5
C4—C3—C5110.81 (17)H1A—N1—H1B109.5
O3—C4—C3112.12 (16)C3—N1—H1C109.5
O3—C4—H4A109.2H1A—N1—H1C109.5
C3—C4—H4A109.2H1B—N1—H1C109.5
O3—C4—H4B109.2C4—O3—H3106.3
C3—C4—H4B109.2C6—O4—H4109.1
H4A—C4—H4B107.9C5—O5—H5109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.892.002.881 (2)169
N1—H1B···O2ii0.891.972.858 (2)172
N1—H1C···O5iii0.892.032.909 (2)169
O3—H3···O4iv0.811.852.654 (2)169
O4—H4···O10.821.842.655 (2)173
O5—H5···O2v0.821.882.691 (2)168
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O3i0.892.002.881 (2)169
N1—H1B⋯O2ii0.891.972.858 (2)172
N1—H1C⋯O5iii0.892.032.909 (2)169
O3—H3⋯O4iv0.811.852.654 (2)169
O4—H4⋯O10.821.842.655 (2)173
O5—H5⋯O2v0.821.882.691 (2)168

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  1,3-Dihy-droxy-2-(hy-droxy-meth-yl)propan-2-aminium formate.

Authors:  Guo-Bin Ren; Ming-Hui Qi; Jin-Yao Chen; Kun-Yan Meng; Jia-Liang Zhong
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-04-29

2.  Crystal structure of diiso-propyl-aminium di-chloro-acetate.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Guangzhi Shan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-04-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.