Literature DB >> 21583120

N,N'-Bis-[(E)-(6-methyl-2-pyridyl)-methyl-ene]hexane-1,6-diamine.

Manuela Ramos Silva, Joana A Silva, Ana Matos Beja, Abilio J F N Sobral.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(20)H(26)N(4), is composed of two (6-methyl-2-pyridyl)methyl-ene units linked by a 1,6-diamine hexane chain. The mol-ecule has C(i) symmetry with the inversion center situated at the mid-point of the central C-C bond. The alkyl chain has an all-trans conformation, with all the non-H atoms sharing the same plane [maximum deviation 0.004 (3) Å]. The pyridylmethyl-ene groups are also planar [maximum deviation 0.009 (3) Å], making an angle of 53.78 (19)° with the hexane chain plane. In the crystal, the mol-ecules assemble in layers, stacking along the a axis. The stacks are hold together by attractive interactions between π electron systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583120      PMCID: PMC2969618          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For salen ligands, their structures and possible applications, see: Cozzi (2004 ▶); Li et al. (2007 ▶); Renehan et al. (2005 ▶); Mohamed et al. (2006 ▶). For ruthenium–salen complexes, see: Wu & Gorden (2007 ▶). For the use of salen ligands to form metal-organic frameworks, see: Bu et al. (2001 ▶); van den Berga & Arean (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C20H26N4 M = 322.45 Orthorhombic, a = 7.2713 (10) Å b = 12.6671 (18) Å c = 20.458 (3) Å V = 1884.3 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.07 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.17 × 0.12 × 0.09 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.891, T max = 0.991 7591 measured reflections 2308 independent reflections 742 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.066

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.184 S = 0.88 2308 reflections 111 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.12 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016730/su2109sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809016730/su2109Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C20H26N4F(000) = 696
Mr = 322.45Dx = 1.137 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 546 reflections
a = 7.2713 (10) Åθ = 3.2–20.3°
b = 12.6671 (18) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
c = 20.458 (3) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1884.3 (5) Å3Prism, yellow
Z = 40.17 × 0.12 × 0.09 mm
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer2308 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube742 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.066
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)h = −9→8
Tmin = 0.891, Tmax = 0.991k = −16→12
7591 measured reflectionsl = −22→25
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.184H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.88w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0774P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2308 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
111 parametersΔρmax = 0.12 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.14 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N20.1193 (3)0.29540 (19)0.10261 (10)0.0731 (7)
C10.0485 (4)0.4665 (2)0.14588 (13)0.0633 (8)
N1−0.0101 (3)0.56245 (18)0.12827 (10)0.0667 (7)
C5−0.0300 (4)0.6357 (2)0.17502 (13)0.0683 (8)
C100.0506 (4)0.05151 (18)−0.00364 (12)0.0711 (8)
H10A0.00340.0880−0.04180.085*
H10B0.17960.0366−0.01150.085*
C90.0355 (4)0.1241 (2)0.05473 (12)0.0719 (8)
H9A−0.09320.14000.06240.086*
H9B0.08200.08770.09300.086*
C20.0901 (4)0.4398 (2)0.20945 (14)0.0792 (9)
H20.13120.37240.21990.095*
C70.0688 (4)0.3890 (2)0.09307 (13)0.0674 (8)
H70.04300.41020.05050.081*
C80.1391 (4)0.2259 (2)0.04644 (12)0.0760 (9)
H8A0.26840.21040.03990.091*
H8B0.09450.26190.00770.091*
C6−0.0943 (5)0.7425 (2)0.15397 (13)0.0892 (10)
H6A0.00120.79330.16160.134*
H6B−0.20180.76170.17850.134*
H6C−0.12380.74110.10820.134*
C40.0072 (4)0.6140 (2)0.23978 (14)0.0762 (9)
H4−0.00950.66580.27150.091*
C30.0690 (4)0.5156 (3)0.25715 (14)0.0852 (10)
H30.09630.50020.30050.102*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N20.0935 (18)0.0568 (16)0.0689 (14)−0.0005 (13)−0.0027 (13)−0.0059 (12)
C10.071 (2)0.061 (2)0.0577 (16)−0.0117 (15)0.0005 (15)−0.0023 (14)
N10.0852 (17)0.0543 (15)0.0605 (13)−0.0067 (13)0.0013 (12)−0.0032 (12)
C50.080 (2)0.064 (2)0.0614 (17)−0.0082 (16)−0.0006 (16)−0.0020 (15)
C100.091 (2)0.0550 (18)0.0675 (16)0.0042 (15)0.0070 (17)0.0000 (14)
C90.091 (2)0.0575 (18)0.0677 (17)0.0042 (17)0.0051 (16)−0.0029 (14)
C20.101 (3)0.067 (2)0.0701 (19)−0.0010 (18)−0.0052 (18)−0.0026 (17)
C70.081 (2)0.061 (2)0.0605 (16)−0.0091 (16)−0.0001 (15)−0.0005 (15)
C80.097 (2)0.065 (2)0.0654 (17)0.0011 (17)0.0064 (16)−0.0070 (15)
C60.130 (3)0.061 (2)0.0771 (18)0.0014 (19)0.000 (2)−0.0048 (16)
C40.095 (2)0.068 (2)0.0651 (19)−0.0068 (19)−0.0056 (16)−0.0116 (15)
C30.114 (3)0.081 (2)0.0602 (17)−0.004 (2)−0.0119 (18)0.0020 (18)
N2—C71.257 (3)C9—H9A0.9700
N2—C81.455 (3)C9—H9B0.9700
C1—N11.338 (3)C2—C31.377 (4)
C1—C21.377 (4)C2—H20.9300
C1—C71.467 (4)C7—H70.9300
N1—C51.340 (3)C8—H8A0.9700
C5—C41.380 (4)C8—H8B0.9700
C5—C61.495 (4)C6—H6A0.9600
C10—C10i1.506 (5)C6—H6B0.9600
C10—C91.511 (3)C6—H6C0.9600
C10—H10A0.9700C4—C31.373 (4)
C10—H10B0.9700C4—H40.9300
C9—C81.503 (3)C3—H30.9300
C7—N2—C8118.5 (2)C1—C2—H2120.9
N1—C1—C2123.2 (3)N2—C7—C1123.1 (3)
N1—C1—C7116.2 (2)N2—C7—H7118.5
C2—C1—C7120.6 (3)C1—C7—H7118.5
C1—N1—C5118.1 (2)N2—C8—C9112.4 (2)
N1—C5—C4121.7 (3)N2—C8—H8A109.1
N1—C5—C6117.1 (2)C9—C8—H8A109.1
C4—C5—C6121.2 (3)N2—C8—H8B109.1
C10i—C10—C9114.4 (3)C9—C8—H8B109.1
C10i—C10—H10A108.7H8A—C8—H8B107.9
C9—C10—H10A108.7C5—C6—H6A109.5
C10i—C10—H10B108.7C5—C6—H6B109.5
C9—C10—H10B108.7H6A—C6—H6B109.5
H10A—C10—H10B107.6C5—C6—H6C109.5
C8—C9—C10113.3 (2)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
C8—C9—H9A108.9H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C10—C9—H9A108.9C3—C4—C5119.6 (3)
C8—C9—H9B108.9C3—C4—H4120.2
C10—C9—H9B108.9C5—C4—H4120.2
H9A—C9—H9B107.7C4—C3—C2119.1 (3)
C3—C2—C1118.3 (3)C4—C3—H3120.5
C3—C2—H2120.9C2—C3—H3120.5
C2—C1—N1—C5−0.4 (4)N1—C1—C7—N2−178.7 (3)
C7—C1—N1—C5−179.8 (2)C2—C1—C7—N21.9 (4)
C1—N1—C5—C4−0.3 (4)C7—N2—C8—C9−127.9 (3)
C1—N1—C5—C6179.6 (3)C10—C9—C8—N2178.8 (2)
C10i—C10—C9—C8179.5 (3)N1—C5—C4—C31.0 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C30.4 (5)C6—C5—C4—C3−178.9 (3)
C7—C1—C2—C3179.9 (3)C5—C4—C3—C2−0.9 (5)
C8—N2—C7—C1−178.5 (2)C1—C2—C3—C40.3 (5)
  4 in total

1.  Metal-Salen Schiff base complexes in catalysis: practical aspects.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Cozzi
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Materials for hydrogen storage: current research trends and perspectives.

Authors:  Annemieke W C van den Berg; Carlos Otero Areán
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  An efficient method for solution-phase parallel synthesis of 2-quinoxalinol salen Schiff-base ligands.

Authors:  Xianghong Wu; Anne E V Gorden
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  2007-05-12
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  1,1'-{(Hexane-1,6-di-yl)bis-[(aza-niumylyl-idene)methanylyl-idene]}bis-(naphthalen-2-olate).

Authors:  Kamel Ouari; Sabrina Bendia; Moufida Merzougui; Corinne Bailly
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-01-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.