Literature DB >> 21582852

1,4-Bis(iodo-meth-yl)benzene.

C John McAdam1, Lyall R Hanton, Stephen C Moratti, Jim Simpson.   

Abstract

The centrosymmetric title compound, C(8)H(8)I(2), was prepared by metathesis from the dibromo analogue. In the crystal structure, weak C-H⋯I inter-actions link the mol-ecules into stacks down the b axis. The structure is further stabilized by short I⋯I contacts [3.8433 (2) Å], forming undulating sheets in the (101) plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582852      PMCID: PMC2969495          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809021151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis, see: Moore & Stupp (1986 ▶); Kida et al. (2005 ▶). For related structures, see: Basaran et al. (1992 ▶); Fun et al. (2009 ▶); Jones & Kus (2007 ▶); Zhang et al. (2007 ▶). For applications of dihalo-p-xylenes in living radical polymerization processes, see: Samakande et al., (2007 ▶); Asandei et al. (2008 ▶). For other polymer applications, see: Leir & Stark (1989 ▶); Hochberg & Schulz (1993 ▶). For additional applications of dihalo-p-xylenes, see: Le Baccon et al. (2001 ▶); Sobransingh & Kaifer (2006 ▶); Song et al. (2008 ▶); Au et al. (2009 ▶). For details of halogenhalogen inter­actions, see: Pedireddi et al. (1994 ▶) and for reference structural data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H8I2 M = 357.94 Monoclinic, a = 9.0978 (3) Å b = 4.5982 (2) Å c = 11.2793 (3) Å β = 99.808 (1)° V = 464.96 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 6.69 mm−1 T = 89 K 0.21 × 0.15 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006 ▶) T min = 0.410, T max = 0.818 8198 measured reflections 1674 independent reflections 1538 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.013 wR(F 2) = 0.033 S = 1.06 1674 reflections 62 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker 2006 ▶); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker 2006 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and TITAN (Hunter & Simpson, 1999 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97, enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004 ▶), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809021151/hb2998sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809021151/hb2998Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8I2F(000) = 324
Mr = 357.94Dx = 2.557 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 5590 reflections
a = 9.0978 (3) Åθ = 2.3–33.0°
b = 4.5982 (2) ŵ = 6.69 mm1
c = 11.2793 (3) ÅT = 89 K
β = 99.808 (1)°Rectangular plate, pale yellow
V = 464.96 (3) Å30.21 × 0.15 × 0.03 mm
Z = 2
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1674 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1538 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.026
ω scansθmax = 33.4°, θmin = 3.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006)h = −13→13
Tmin = 0.410, Tmax = 0.818k = −5→7
8198 measured reflectionsl = −16→16
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.033All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0145P)2 + 0.1407P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1674 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
62 parametersΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.51 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.62504 (16)0.1521 (3)0.47504 (13)0.0138 (2)
C20.63784 (17)−0.0405 (3)0.57245 (14)0.0154 (3)
C30.51429 (17)−0.1903 (3)0.59710 (14)0.0154 (3)
C40.75717 (18)0.3189 (4)0.45106 (15)0.0190 (3)
I10.880515 (9)0.07951 (2)0.331669 (8)0.01438 (4)
H20.729 (3)−0.073 (4)0.620 (2)0.021 (6)*
H410.841 (3)0.354 (5)0.524 (2)0.031 (6)*
H30.523 (2)−0.330 (5)0.6678 (19)0.022 (5)*
H420.733 (3)0.509 (5)0.405 (2)0.021 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0142 (6)0.0109 (6)0.0180 (6)−0.0017 (5)0.0078 (5)−0.0032 (5)
C20.0133 (6)0.0159 (7)0.0174 (7)0.0007 (5)0.0038 (5)−0.0010 (5)
C30.0175 (6)0.0126 (6)0.0175 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0070 (5)0.0012 (5)
C40.0191 (7)0.0150 (7)0.0258 (8)−0.0039 (5)0.0124 (6)−0.0051 (6)
I10.01367 (5)0.01628 (6)0.01473 (5)−0.00037 (3)0.00680 (3)0.00092 (3)
C1—C3i1.396 (2)C3—C1i1.396 (2)
C1—C21.401 (2)C3—H31.01 (2)
C1—C41.489 (2)C4—I12.1907 (15)
C2—C31.386 (2)C4—H411.04 (2)
C2—H20.92 (2)C4—H421.02 (2)
C3i—C1—C2118.88 (13)C1i—C3—H3118.7 (12)
C3i—C1—C4120.68 (14)C1—C4—I1111.52 (10)
C2—C1—C4120.42 (14)C1—C4—H41116.4 (13)
C3—C2—C1120.64 (14)I1—C4—H41100.5 (13)
C3—C2—H2119.1 (14)C1—C4—H42114.9 (13)
C1—C2—H2120.3 (14)I1—C4—H42101.8 (13)
C2—C3—C1i120.48 (14)H41—C4—H42109.8 (19)
C2—C3—H3120.9 (12)
C3i—C1—C2—C3−0.1 (2)C3i—C1—C4—I1−91.95 (15)
C4—C1—C2—C3178.24 (14)C2—C1—C4—I189.71 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C1i0.1 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C4—H42···I1ii1.02 (2)3.12 (2)3.9774 (16)141.8 (16)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C4—H42⋯I1i1.02 (2)3.12 (2)3.9774 (16)141.8 (16)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis and oxidation-induced DNA cross-linking capabilities of bis(catechol) quaternary ammonium derivatives.

Authors:  Zhibin Song; Xiaocheng Weng; Liwei Weng; Jing Huang; Xiaolin Wang; Minghui Bai; Yangyang Zhou; Guangfu Yang; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  Electrochemically switchable cucurbit[7]uril-based pseudorotaxanes.

Authors:  David Sobransingh; Angel E Kaifer
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 6.005

4.  1,4-Bis(fluoro-meth-yl)benzene.

Authors:  Hoong-Kun Fun; Reza Kia; P S Patil; S M Dharmaprakash
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-02-04

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structures of two bis-(iodo-meth-yl)benzene derivatives: similarities and differences in the crystal packing.

Authors:  C John McAdam; Lyall R Hanton; Stephen C Moratti; Jim Simpson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-11-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.