Literature DB >> 21582407

3-Methyl-2-propionamido-butanoic acid.

Bohari M Yamin1, Eliyanti A Othman.   

Abstract

The reaction of propionyl isothio-cyanate with n class="Chemical">valine was found to give the title compound, C(8)H(15)NO(3), instead of the expected thio-urea product. The whole mol-ecule is non-planar and the carbonyl group is cis to the methyl-butanoic acid group across the C-N bond. Inter-molecular O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds build up a two-dimensional network developing parallel to (100).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582407      PMCID: PMC2968931          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the crystal structure of N-propionylthio­urea, see: Yamin & Othman (2008 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H15NO3 M = 173.21 Monoclinic, a = 9.477 (3) Å b = 8.633 (2) Å c = 12.766 (3) Å β = 103.123 (6)° V = 1017.2 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.49 × 0.33 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.959, T max = 0.984 5313 measured reflections 1887 independent reflections 1262 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.059 wR(F 2) = 0.167 S = 1.04 1887 reflections 117 parameters 2 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97, PARST (Nardelli, 1995 ▶) and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007119/dn2429sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007119/dn2429Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H15NO3F(000) = 376
Mr = 173.21Dx = 1.131 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point: 475.5 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.477 (3) ÅCell parameters from 1183 reflections
b = 8.633 (2) Åθ = 2.2–25.5°
c = 12.766 (3) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 103.123 (6)°T = 298 K
V = 1017.2 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.49 × 0.33 × 0.18 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1887 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1262 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.024
Detector resolution: 83.66 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.2°
ω scansh = −10→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.959, Tmax = 0.984l = −15→8
5313 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.167H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0815P)2 + 0.2058P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1887 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
117 parametersΔρmax = 0.24 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = −0.15 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.58011 (17)0.1690 (2)−0.01032 (13)0.0706 (6)
O20.80400 (19)0.2599 (2)0.01281 (15)0.0808 (6)
H2C0.775 (3)0.309 (3)−0.0430 (16)0.115 (12)*
O30.7243 (2)0.0786 (2)0.33764 (14)0.0835 (6)
N10.6507 (2)−0.0073 (2)0.17012 (15)0.0523 (5)
H1D0.5834 (18)−0.050 (2)0.1230 (15)0.058 (7)*
C10.3968 (4)0.0265 (4)0.3214 (3)0.1079 (12)
H1A0.3188−0.03400.33660.162*
H1B0.36020.09280.26100.162*
H1C0.43900.08840.38300.162*
C20.5071 (3)−0.0769 (3)0.2963 (2)0.0776 (8)
H2A0.4623−0.14110.23540.093*
H2B0.5414−0.14490.35720.093*
C30.6357 (3)0.0049 (3)0.27028 (19)0.0573 (6)
C40.7670 (2)0.0664 (3)0.13158 (16)0.0509 (6)
H4A0.81990.13310.18940.061*
C50.8765 (3)−0.0509 (3)0.1042 (2)0.0684 (7)
H5A0.95120.00830.07970.082*
C60.9513 (3)−0.1423 (4)0.2037 (3)0.1062 (11)
H6A1.0190−0.21380.18470.159*
H6B0.8802−0.19830.23130.159*
H6C1.0020−0.07210.25760.159*
C70.8066 (3)−0.1595 (4)0.0136 (3)0.0905 (9)
H7A0.8782−0.2296−0.00120.136*
H7B0.7664−0.1002−0.04980.136*
H7C0.7309−0.21730.03450.136*
C80.7047 (2)0.1683 (2)0.03739 (16)0.0517 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0574 (11)0.0732 (12)0.0697 (11)−0.0047 (8)−0.0100 (8)0.0117 (8)
O20.0616 (11)0.1039 (14)0.0740 (13)−0.0103 (10)0.0094 (9)0.0375 (11)
O30.1026 (15)0.0943 (14)0.0564 (11)−0.0129 (11)0.0237 (10)−0.0233 (10)
N10.0491 (11)0.0648 (12)0.0422 (10)−0.0072 (9)0.0087 (8)−0.0021 (9)
C10.088 (2)0.088 (2)0.162 (4)−0.0066 (18)0.057 (2)0.001 (2)
C20.097 (2)0.0680 (17)0.0806 (18)0.0026 (15)0.0463 (16)0.0076 (13)
C30.0682 (15)0.0526 (13)0.0538 (14)0.0077 (12)0.0194 (12)−0.0015 (11)
C40.0442 (12)0.0609 (13)0.0444 (12)−0.0073 (10)0.0035 (9)0.0038 (10)
C50.0495 (13)0.0817 (17)0.0755 (17)0.0093 (12)0.0172 (12)0.0186 (14)
C60.082 (2)0.123 (3)0.110 (2)0.036 (2)0.0132 (17)0.040 (2)
C70.091 (2)0.087 (2)0.101 (2)0.0129 (17)0.0370 (17)−0.0154 (17)
C80.0533 (13)0.0564 (13)0.0438 (12)−0.0049 (11)0.0077 (10)−0.0016 (10)
O1—C81.200 (2)C2—H2B0.9700
O2—C81.320 (3)C4—C81.499 (3)
O2—H2C0.821 (10)C4—C51.546 (3)
O3—C31.233 (3)C4—H4A0.9800
N1—C31.322 (3)C5—C71.519 (4)
N1—C41.453 (3)C5—C61.526 (4)
N1—H1D0.855 (10)C5—H5A0.9800
C1—C21.464 (4)C6—H6A0.9600
C1—H1A0.9600C6—H6B0.9600
C1—H1B0.9600C6—H6C0.9600
C1—H1C0.9600C7—H7A0.9600
C2—C31.509 (3)C7—H7B0.9600
C2—H2A0.9700C7—H7C0.9600
C8—O2—H2C114 (2)C8—C4—H4A107.5
C3—N1—C4123.30 (19)C5—C4—H4A107.5
C3—N1—H1D119.2 (16)C7—C5—C6110.8 (3)
C4—N1—H1D117.0 (16)C7—C5—C4112.18 (19)
C2—C1—H1A109.5C6—C5—C4111.1 (2)
C2—C1—H1B109.5C7—C5—H5A107.5
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C6—C5—H5A107.5
C2—C1—H1C109.5C4—C5—H5A107.5
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C5—C6—H6A109.5
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C5—C6—H6B109.5
C1—C2—C3114.5 (2)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C1—C2—H2A108.6C5—C6—H6C109.5
C3—C2—H2A108.6H6A—C6—H6C109.5
C1—C2—H2B108.6H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C3—C2—H2B108.6C5—C7—H7A109.5
H2A—C2—H2B107.6C5—C7—H7B109.5
O3—C3—N1120.7 (2)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
O3—C3—C2122.9 (2)C5—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C3—C2116.4 (2)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—C8109.76 (17)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—C5112.93 (19)O1—C8—O2123.3 (2)
C8—C4—C5111.44 (18)O1—C8—C4125.0 (2)
N1—C4—H4A107.5O2—C8—C4111.72 (19)
C4—N1—C3—O3−1.7 (3)C8—C4—C5—C7−61.5 (3)
C4—N1—C3—C2179.0 (2)N1—C4—C5—C6−62.0 (3)
C1—C2—C3—O368.0 (4)C8—C4—C5—C6173.9 (2)
C1—C2—C3—N1−112.7 (3)N1—C4—C8—O1−11.6 (3)
C3—N1—C4—C8−123.5 (2)C5—C4—C8—O1114.2 (3)
C3—N1—C4—C5111.5 (2)N1—C4—C8—O2167.87 (19)
N1—C4—C5—C762.6 (3)C5—C4—C8—O2−66.3 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1D···O1i0.86 (2)2.13 (2)2.978 (3)177 (2)
O2—H2C···O3ii0.82 (2)1.78 (2)2.598 (3)176 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1D⋯O1i0.855 (18)2.125 (18)2.978 (3)176.6 (16)
O2—H2C⋯O3ii0.82 (2)1.78 (2)2.598 (3)176 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  N-Propionylthio-urea.

Authors:  Bohari M Yamin; Eliyanti A Othman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2007-12-21

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.