Literature DB >> 21582187

rac-(S)-2-(1H-Imidazol-1-yl)-3-methyl-butan-1-ol.

Guangfu Song1, Fang Xue, Dongliang Li.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(8)H(14)N(2)O, inter-molecular O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds link mol-ecules related by translation along the a axis into chains. Weak inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and C-H⋯π inter-actions enhance the crystal packing stability.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582187      PMCID: PMC2968557          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809004565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For useful applications of imidazole derivatives, see Lu et al. (2006 ▶); Zou et al. (2006 ▶). For details of the synthesis, see Bao et al. (2003 ▶); Guo et al. (2006 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H14N2O M = 154.21 Monoclinic, a = 7.356 (4) Å b = 7.212 (3) Å c = 16.549 (5) Å β = 90.54 (3)° V = 877.9 (7) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 292 K 0.58 × 0.54 × 0.42 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: none 1931 measured reflections 1630 independent reflections 965 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.004 3 standard reflections every 120 reflections intensity decay: 0.3%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.067 wR(F 2) = 0.197 S = 1.18 1630 reflections 104 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 Data collection: DIFRAC (Gabe & White, 1993 ▶); cell refinement: DIFRAC; data reduction: NRCVAX (Gabe et al., 1989 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809004565/cv2517sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809004565/cv2517Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H14N2OF(000) = 336
Mr = 154.21Dx = 1.167 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 21 reflections
a = 7.356 (4) Åθ = 4.6–7.4°
b = 7.212 (3) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 16.549 (5) ÅT = 292 K
β = 90.54 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 877.9 (7) Å30.58 × 0.54 × 0.42 mm
Z = 4
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometerRint = 0.004
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.5°
graphiteh = −8→8
ω/2θ scansk = 0→8
1931 measured reflectionsl = −7→20
1630 independent reflections3 standard reflections every 120 reflections
965 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: 0.3%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.067H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.197w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0941P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.18(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1630 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
104 parametersΔρmin = −0.24 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.046 (11)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.4065 (2)0.1870 (3)0.31165 (14)0.0557 (7)
H10.30110.16970.32550.084*
N10.7629 (3)0.0340 (3)0.34211 (14)0.0459 (7)
N21.0479 (3)0.1263 (4)0.34916 (16)0.0598 (8)
C40.6043 (3)−0.0816 (4)0.32307 (17)0.0456 (8)
H40.6473−0.18480.28980.055*
C50.4713 (4)0.0284 (4)0.27157 (18)0.0480 (8)
H5A0.53060.06600.22210.058*
H5B0.3692−0.05030.25700.058*
C10.9353 (4)0.0047 (4)0.31778 (19)0.0514 (8)
H1A0.9698−0.09010.28300.062*
C30.7676 (4)0.1855 (4)0.39170 (18)0.0559 (8)
H30.66960.24060.41740.067*
C60.5261 (4)−0.1657 (4)0.39954 (16)0.0487 (8)
H60.4769−0.06430.43220.058*
C20.9438 (4)0.2392 (4)0.3958 (2)0.0597 (9)
H20.98750.33870.42600.072*
C70.3712 (5)−0.2990 (5)0.3805 (2)0.0693 (10)
H7A0.4164−0.40130.34950.104*
H7B0.2786−0.23550.35000.104*
H7C0.3208−0.34440.43000.104*
C80.6711 (5)−0.2629 (5)0.4495 (2)0.0761 (11)
H8A0.6199−0.30350.49960.114*
H8B0.7693−0.17860.46020.114*
H8C0.7157−0.36810.42020.114*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0302 (11)0.0505 (12)0.0864 (15)0.0012 (9)−0.0025 (10)−0.0011 (11)
N10.0288 (13)0.0493 (13)0.0595 (15)0.0029 (11)−0.0026 (10)−0.0055 (11)
N20.0307 (14)0.0628 (16)0.086 (2)−0.0005 (12)−0.0039 (13)−0.0031 (14)
C40.0325 (15)0.0424 (15)0.0617 (18)−0.0002 (12)−0.0060 (13)−0.0027 (14)
C50.0355 (16)0.0499 (16)0.0586 (17)−0.0024 (13)−0.0038 (13)−0.0008 (14)
C10.0334 (16)0.0518 (17)0.069 (2)0.0086 (14)0.0035 (14)−0.0014 (14)
C30.0353 (16)0.0655 (19)0.0669 (19)0.0006 (15)−0.0020 (14)−0.0129 (16)
C60.0407 (16)0.0520 (17)0.0532 (17)0.0002 (14)−0.0043 (13)0.0040 (14)
C20.0405 (17)0.0628 (19)0.075 (2)−0.0027 (15)−0.0125 (15)−0.0133 (16)
C70.066 (2)0.071 (2)0.071 (2)−0.0228 (19)0.0010 (17)0.0087 (18)
C80.063 (2)0.085 (2)0.081 (2)0.0034 (19)−0.0120 (19)0.025 (2)
O1—C51.408 (3)C3—C21.354 (4)
O1—H10.8200C3—H30.9300
N1—C11.351 (4)C6—C81.515 (4)
N1—C31.367 (3)C6—C71.522 (4)
N1—C41.466 (3)C6—H60.9800
N2—C11.310 (3)C2—H20.9300
N2—C21.362 (4)C7—H7A0.9600
C4—C51.516 (3)C7—H7B0.9600
C4—C61.521 (4)C7—H7C0.9600
C4—H40.9800C8—H8A0.9600
C5—H5A0.9700C8—H8B0.9600
C5—H5B0.9700C8—H8C0.9600
C1—H1A0.9300
C5—O1—H1109.5N1—C3—H3126.9
C1—N1—C3106.6 (2)C8—C6—C4111.6 (2)
C1—N1—C4126.5 (2)C8—C6—C7110.0 (3)
C3—N1—C4126.8 (2)C4—C6—C7111.6 (2)
C1—N2—C2105.6 (2)C8—C6—H6107.8
N1—C4—C5109.4 (2)C4—C6—H6107.8
N1—C4—C6110.8 (2)C7—C6—H6107.8
C5—C4—C6115.4 (2)C3—C2—N2110.1 (3)
N1—C4—H4107.0C3—C2—H2125.0
C5—C4—H4107.0N2—C2—H2125.0
C6—C4—H4107.0C6—C7—H7A109.5
O1—C5—C4112.3 (2)C6—C7—H7B109.5
O1—C5—H5A109.1H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C4—C5—H5A109.1C6—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C5—H5B109.1H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C5—H5B109.1H7B—C7—H7C109.5
H5A—C5—H5B107.9C6—C8—H8A109.5
N2—C1—N1111.6 (3)C6—C8—H8B109.5
N2—C1—H1A124.2H8A—C8—H8B109.5
N1—C1—H1A124.2C6—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—N1106.1 (3)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—H3126.9H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C1—N1—C4—C5−115.0 (3)C1—N1—C3—C2−0.8 (3)
C3—N1—C4—C569.3 (3)C4—N1—C3—C2175.7 (2)
C1—N1—C4—C6116.8 (3)N1—C4—C6—C8−51.7 (3)
C3—N1—C4—C6−59.0 (3)C5—C4—C6—C8−176.6 (2)
N1—C4—C5—O1−61.5 (3)N1—C4—C6—C7−175.2 (2)
C6—C4—C5—O164.2 (3)C5—C4—C6—C759.9 (3)
C2—N2—C1—N10.0 (3)N1—C3—C2—N20.8 (4)
C3—N1—C1—N20.5 (3)C1—N2—C2—C3−0.5 (4)
C4—N1—C1—N2−175.9 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N2i0.821.932.751 (3)176
C1—H1A···O1ii0.932.433.353 (4)173
C4—H4···Cgii0.982.863.716 (4)146
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N2i0.821.932.751 (3)176
C1—H1A⋯O1ii0.932.433.353 (4)173
C4—H4⋯Cgii0.982.863.716 (4)146

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) . Cg is the centroid of the C1–C3/N1/N2 ring.

  5 in total

1.  Synthesis of chiral ionic liquids from natural amino acids.

Authors:  Weiliang Bao; Zhiming Wang; Yuxia Li
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 4.354

2.  Two stable 3D metal-organic frameworks constructed by nanoscale cages via sharing the single-layer walls.

Authors:  Wen-Guan Lu; Cheng-Yong Su; Tong-Bu Lu; Long Jiang; Jia-Mei Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Preparation, adsorption properties, and catalytic activity of 3D porous metal-organic frameworks composed of cubic building blocks and alkali-metal ions.

Authors:  Ru-Qiang Zou; Hiroaki Sakurai; Qiang Xu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.