Literature DB >> 21582107

Poly[dichloridobis[μ-1-(4-pyridylmeth-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole]copper(II)].

Zhu-Lai Li1, Jian Wang, Xiu-Zhi Xu, Xiao Ye.   

Abstract

The title coordination polymer, [CuCl(2)(C(8)H(8)N(4))(2)](n), arose from a layer-separated diffusion synthesis at room temperature. The Cu atom (site symmetry ) is coordinated by two chloride ions and four N atoms (two from triazole rings and two from pyridyl rings) in a distorted trans-CuCl(2)N(4) octa-hedral arrangement. The bridging 1-(4-pyridylmeth-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole ligands [dihedral angle between the triazole and pyridine rings = 68.08 (8)°] result in a two-dimensional 4(4) sheet structure in the crystal.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582107      PMCID: PMC2968461          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680900645X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background on the synthesis and structures of coordination polymers, see: Carlucci et al. (2000 ▶, 2004 ▶); Effendy et al. (2003 ▶); Evans et al. (1999 ▶); Huang et al. (2006 ▶); Liu et al. (2005 ▶); Moulton & Zaworotko (2001 ▶); Ranford et al. (1999 ▶); Sharma & Rogers (1999 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[CuCl2(C8H8N4)2] M = 454.81 Monoclinic, a = 7.5112 (5) Å b = 16.0876 (9) Å c = 8.3390 (6) Å β = 116.469 (2)° V = 902.03 (10) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.53 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Siemens SMART diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Siemens, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.88, T max = 1.00 (expected range = 0.700–0.795) 6345 measured reflections 2067 independent reflections 1864 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.017

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036 wR(F 2) = 0.087 S = 1.01 2067 reflections 124 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.81 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.56 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680900645X/hb2898sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680900645X/hb2898Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[CuCl2(C8H8N4)2]F(000) = 462
Mr = 454.81Dx = 1.674 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2134 reflections
a = 7.5112 (5) Åθ = 2.7–27.5°
b = 16.0876 (9) ŵ = 1.53 mm1
c = 8.3390 (6) ÅT = 293 K
β = 116.469 (2)°Prism, blue
V = 902.03 (10) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2
Siemens SMART diffractometer2067 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1864 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.017
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Siemens, 1996)h = −9→6
Tmin = 0.88, Tmax = 1.00k = −20→16
6345 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.087H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0347P)2 + 1.5333P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2067 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
124 parametersΔρmax = 0.81 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.56 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.50000.00000.50000.02592 (13)
Cl10.10912 (10)0.03685 (4)0.30125 (10)0.03818 (18)
C10.6294 (4)0.07131 (16)0.8758 (4)0.0365 (6)
H1A0.76340.06660.90320.044*
C20.3175 (4)0.06044 (15)0.7390 (4)0.0307 (5)
H2A0.18810.04820.65550.037*
C30.2381 (5)0.12190 (16)0.9732 (4)0.0355 (6)
H3A0.30140.10571.09840.043*
H3B0.11590.09020.91470.043*
C40.1852 (4)0.21295 (15)0.9625 (3)0.0291 (5)
C50.2897 (4)0.27713 (16)0.9343 (4)0.0358 (6)
H5A0.39870.26590.91300.043*
C60.2312 (4)0.35851 (16)0.9379 (4)0.0337 (6)
H6A0.30500.40110.92110.040*
C7−0.0305 (4)0.31581 (17)0.9856 (4)0.0403 (7)
H7A−0.14390.32840.99910.048*
C80.0212 (4)0.23381 (17)0.9888 (5)0.0419 (7)
H8A−0.05340.19251.00840.050*
N10.3680 (4)0.09900 (13)0.8939 (3)0.0322 (5)
N20.5650 (4)0.10725 (15)0.9833 (3)0.0378 (5)
N30.4802 (3)0.04199 (13)0.7215 (3)0.0300 (5)
N40.0740 (3)0.37867 (12)0.9642 (3)0.0279 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0367 (2)0.0165 (2)0.0367 (2)−0.00556 (16)0.0272 (2)−0.00450 (16)
Cl10.0402 (4)0.0381 (4)0.0442 (4)−0.0050 (3)0.0260 (3)−0.0017 (3)
C10.0337 (14)0.0291 (13)0.0474 (16)0.0011 (11)0.0189 (12)−0.0053 (11)
C20.0349 (13)0.0266 (12)0.0366 (13)−0.0025 (10)0.0214 (11)−0.0046 (10)
C30.0505 (16)0.0232 (12)0.0460 (16)0.0040 (11)0.0334 (14)−0.0026 (11)
C40.0387 (14)0.0217 (11)0.0313 (13)0.0030 (10)0.0196 (11)−0.0027 (9)
C50.0411 (15)0.0286 (12)0.0522 (17)0.0053 (11)0.0337 (14)0.0005 (11)
C60.0393 (14)0.0264 (12)0.0478 (16)0.0000 (11)0.0305 (13)0.0015 (11)
C70.0376 (15)0.0259 (13)0.071 (2)0.0007 (11)0.0364 (15)−0.0021 (13)
C80.0444 (16)0.0223 (12)0.073 (2)−0.0047 (11)0.0383 (16)−0.0034 (12)
N10.0439 (13)0.0221 (10)0.0374 (12)0.0032 (9)0.0243 (11)−0.0023 (8)
N20.0409 (13)0.0329 (12)0.0409 (13)−0.0017 (10)0.0195 (11)−0.0107 (10)
N30.0321 (11)0.0252 (10)0.0396 (12)−0.0018 (8)0.0223 (10)−0.0039 (9)
N40.0330 (11)0.0195 (9)0.0375 (11)0.0024 (8)0.0212 (10)0.0018 (8)
Cu1—N32.034 (2)C3—H3A0.9700
Cu1—N3i2.034 (2)C3—H3B0.9700
Cu1—N4ii2.087 (2)C4—C51.379 (4)
Cu1—N4iii2.087 (2)C4—C81.386 (4)
Cu1—Cl12.7167 (7)C5—C61.385 (4)
Cu1—Cl1i2.7167 (7)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—N21.327 (4)C6—N41.334 (3)
C1—N31.359 (4)C6—H6A0.9300
C1—H1A0.9300C7—N41.340 (3)
C2—N11.327 (3)C7—C81.372 (4)
C2—N31.327 (3)C7—H7A0.9300
C2—H2A0.9300C8—H8A0.9300
C3—N11.450 (3)N1—N21.334 (3)
C3—C41.510 (3)N4—Cu1iv2.0870 (19)
N3—Cu1—N3i180.0H3A—C3—H3B107.4
N3—Cu1—N4ii92.80 (8)C5—C4—C8117.3 (2)
N3i—Cu1—N4ii87.20 (8)C5—C4—C3125.6 (2)
N3—Cu1—N4iii87.20 (8)C8—C4—C3117.0 (2)
N3i—Cu1—N4iii92.80 (8)C4—C5—C6119.6 (2)
N4ii—Cu1—N4iii180.0C4—C5—H5A120.2
N3—Cu1—Cl189.14 (6)C6—C5—H5A120.2
N3i—Cu1—Cl190.86 (6)N4—C6—C5123.1 (2)
N4ii—Cu1—Cl190.41 (6)N4—C6—H6A118.5
N4iii—Cu1—Cl189.59 (6)C5—C6—H6A118.5
N3—Cu1—Cl1i90.86 (6)N4—C7—C8123.4 (2)
N3i—Cu1—Cl1i89.14 (6)N4—C7—H7A118.3
N4ii—Cu1—Cl1i89.59 (6)C8—C7—H7A118.3
N4iii—Cu1—Cl1i90.41 (6)C7—C8—C4119.6 (2)
Cl1—Cu1—Cl1i180.0C7—C8—H8A120.2
N2—C1—N3113.3 (2)C4—C8—H8A120.2
N2—C1—H1A123.4C2—N1—N2110.8 (2)
N3—C1—H1A123.4C2—N1—C3127.2 (2)
N1—C2—N3109.5 (2)N2—N1—C3121.6 (2)
N1—C2—H2A125.3C1—N2—N1103.1 (2)
N3—C2—H2A125.3C2—N3—C1103.3 (2)
N1—C3—C4115.6 (2)C2—N3—Cu1128.15 (19)
N1—C3—H3A108.4C1—N3—Cu1127.69 (18)
C4—C3—H3A108.4C6—N4—C7116.9 (2)
N1—C3—H3B108.4C6—N4—Cu1iv124.24 (17)
C4—C3—H3B108.4C7—N4—Cu1iv118.55 (17)
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Cu1—N32.034 (2)
Cu1—N4i2.087 (2)
Cu1—Cl12.7167 (7)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  6 in total

1.  Polymeric Layers Catenated by Ribbons of Rings in a Three-Dimensional Self-Assembled Architecture: A Nanoporous Network with Spongelike Behavior.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids.

Authors:  B Moulton; M J Zaworotko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Thermal Conversion of a Helical Coil into a Three-Dimensional Chiral Framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  A new type of entanglement involving one-dimensional ribbons of rings catenated to a three-dimensional network in the nanoporous structure of [Co(bix)2(H2O)2](SO4).7H2O [bix = 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene].

Authors:  Lucia Carlucci; Gianfranco Ciani; Davide M Proserpio
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of silver(I) complexes with the bis(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)alkane ligand tz2(CH2). X-ray structures of two- and three-dimensional coordination polymers.

Authors:  Fabio Marchetti; Claudio Pettinari; Riccardo Pettinari; Brian W Skelton; Allan H White
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 5.165

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Poly[dichloridobis[μ-1-(4-pyridyl-meth-yl)-1,2,4-triazole]cadmium(II)].

Authors:  Jian Wang; Zhu-Lai Li; Xiu-Zhi Xu; Wen-Jin Yan; Hui-Li Chi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-15

2.  Poly[dibromidobis[μ-1-(pyridin-4-ylmeth-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-κN:N']cadmium].

Authors:  Xiu-Zhi Xu; Zhu-Lai Li; Wen-Jin Yan; Hui-Li Chi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-01-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.