Literature DB >> 21581935

2,3,5,6-Tetra-fluoro-1,4-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl-eneamino-meth-yl)benzene.

Ming-Yang He, Chao Li, Xu-Jie Yang, Lu-De Lu, Xin Wang.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(20)H(14)F(4)N(4), is a flexible bis-pyridine-type ligand with an extended fluorinated spacer group between the two pyridyl functions. The centroid of the central aromatic ring is situated on a crystallographic center of inversion. The dihedral angle between the pyridine ring and the central benzene ring is 63.85 (9)°. The crystal structure exhibits inter-molecular C-H⋯F hydrogen-bonding inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21581935      PMCID: PMC2968251          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809001172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background information on bis-pyridine-type Schiff base ligands see: Barboiu et al. (2006 ▶); Keegan et al. (2002 ▶); Yue et al. (2004 ▶). Haga et al. (1985 ▶) describe the synthesis of the title compound.

Experimental

Crystal data

C20H14F4N4 M = 386.35 Monoclinic, a = 9.637 (3) Å b = 7.783 (3) Å c = 12.070 (4) Å β = 105.940 (4)° V = 870.5 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 296 (2) K 0.26 × 0.24 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.963, T max = 0.974 7194 measured reflections 2014 independent reflections 1341 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.037

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045 wR(F 2) = 0.151 S = 1.05 2014 reflections 127 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809001172/im2091sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809001172/im2091Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C20H14F4N4F(000) = 396
Mr = 386.35Dx = 1.474 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3894 reflections
a = 9.637 (3) Åθ = 2.6–27.2°
b = 7.783 (3) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 12.070 (4) ÅT = 296 K
β = 105.940 (4)°Block, colorless
V = 870.5 (5) Å30.26 × 0.24 × 0.22 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer2014 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1341 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.037
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.963, Tmax = 0.974k = −10→10
7194 measured reflectionsl = −15→15
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.151H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0739P)2 + 0.1642P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2014 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.6996 (3)0.1926 (3)0.52870 (19)0.0733 (6)
H10.73260.22860.60490.088*
C20.5633 (3)0.2358 (3)0.4693 (2)0.0781 (7)
H20.50470.29810.50440.094*
C30.5132 (2)0.1855 (3)0.3558 (2)0.0761 (7)
H30.42010.21270.31280.091*
C40.6041 (2)0.0941 (3)0.30767 (18)0.0624 (5)
H40.57340.05910.23110.075*
C50.74130 (19)0.0548 (2)0.37431 (15)0.0482 (4)
C60.8435 (2)−0.0426 (2)0.32794 (16)0.0507 (4)
H60.9325−0.07380.37700.061*
C70.9207 (2)−0.1847 (3)0.18519 (18)0.0643 (6)
H7A0.8812−0.29640.15770.077*
H7B1.0053−0.20240.24960.077*
C80.9627 (2)−0.0904 (2)0.08987 (16)0.0538 (5)
C91.0951 (2)−0.0132 (3)0.10554 (16)0.0547 (5)
C101.1317 (2)0.0740 (2)0.01844 (18)0.0556 (5)
F11.19419 (14)−0.02363 (18)0.20914 (11)0.0756 (4)
F21.26344 (13)0.14574 (17)0.04184 (11)0.0762 (4)
N10.79039 (18)0.1014 (2)0.48488 (14)0.0622 (5)
N20.81318 (17)−0.0848 (2)0.22290 (14)0.0567 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0789 (15)0.0860 (16)0.0611 (12)0.0097 (13)0.0293 (11)−0.0086 (11)
C20.0766 (15)0.0762 (16)0.0951 (18)0.0164 (12)0.0465 (13)−0.0028 (13)
C30.0537 (11)0.0797 (16)0.0951 (18)0.0162 (11)0.0207 (11)0.0089 (13)
C40.0584 (11)0.0667 (13)0.0620 (12)0.0040 (10)0.0161 (9)−0.0002 (10)
C50.0519 (10)0.0463 (10)0.0503 (10)−0.0013 (8)0.0206 (8)0.0049 (8)
C60.0498 (10)0.0523 (11)0.0539 (10)−0.0006 (8)0.0207 (8)0.0059 (8)
C70.0798 (13)0.0555 (12)0.0732 (13)0.0025 (10)0.0472 (11)0.0011 (10)
C80.0672 (12)0.0464 (11)0.0597 (11)−0.0007 (9)0.0373 (10)−0.0084 (8)
C90.0618 (11)0.0549 (11)0.0537 (10)−0.0018 (9)0.0267 (9)−0.0124 (8)
C100.0577 (11)0.0512 (11)0.0688 (12)−0.0102 (9)0.0354 (10)−0.0153 (9)
F10.0769 (8)0.0893 (10)0.0619 (8)−0.0030 (7)0.0213 (6)−0.0061 (6)
F20.0663 (7)0.0819 (9)0.0898 (9)−0.0222 (6)0.0376 (7)−0.0141 (7)
N10.0599 (10)0.0747 (11)0.0535 (9)0.0079 (8)0.0179 (7)−0.0038 (8)
N20.0602 (9)0.0624 (10)0.0566 (9)−0.0033 (8)0.0316 (7)0.0011 (7)
C1—N11.343 (3)C6—H60.9300
C1—C21.355 (3)C7—N21.464 (2)
C1—H10.9300C7—C81.511 (3)
C2—C31.378 (3)C7—H7A0.9700
C2—H20.9300C7—H7B0.9700
C3—C41.375 (3)C8—C91.375 (3)
C3—H30.9300C8—C10i1.379 (3)
C4—C51.380 (3)C9—F11.351 (2)
C4—H40.9300C9—C101.376 (3)
C5—N11.338 (2)C10—F21.344 (2)
C5—C61.470 (3)C10—C8i1.379 (3)
C6—N21.264 (2)
N1—C1—C2124.4 (2)N2—C7—C8109.82 (16)
N1—C1—H1117.8N2—C7—H7A109.7
C2—C1—H1117.8C8—C7—H7A109.7
C1—C2—C3118.6 (2)N2—C7—H7B109.7
C1—C2—H2120.7C8—C7—H7B109.7
C3—C2—H2120.7H7A—C7—H7B108.2
C4—C3—C2118.5 (2)C9—C8—C10i115.87 (17)
C4—C3—H3120.7C9—C8—C7122.69 (19)
C2—C3—H3120.7C10i—C8—C7121.43 (18)
C3—C4—C5119.2 (2)F1—C9—C8119.61 (17)
C3—C4—H4120.4F1—C9—C10118.19 (18)
C5—C4—H4120.4C8—C9—C10122.21 (19)
N1—C5—C4122.76 (18)F2—C10—C9118.03 (19)
N1—C5—C6115.41 (16)F2—C10—C8i120.04 (17)
C4—C5—C6121.82 (18)C9—C10—C8i121.93 (18)
N2—C6—C5121.41 (17)C5—N1—C1116.50 (17)
N2—C6—H6119.3C6—N2—C7117.46 (17)
C5—C6—H6119.3
N1—C1—C2—C3−0.8 (4)C10i—C8—C9—C10−0.5 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.2 (4)C7—C8—C9—C10−179.29 (17)
C2—C3—C4—C50.5 (4)F1—C9—C10—F2−0.8 (3)
C3—C4—C5—N10.3 (3)C8—C9—C10—F2179.80 (16)
C3—C4—C5—C6179.96 (19)F1—C9—C10—C8i179.86 (16)
N1—C5—C6—N2−175.63 (17)C8—C9—C10—C8i0.5 (3)
C4—C5—C6—N24.7 (3)C4—C5—N1—C1−1.2 (3)
N2—C7—C8—C9108.5 (2)C6—C5—N1—C1179.09 (18)
N2—C7—C8—C10i−70.3 (2)C2—C1—N1—C51.5 (4)
C10i—C8—C9—F1−179.83 (16)C5—C6—N2—C7−178.80 (16)
C7—C8—C9—F11.3 (3)C8—C7—N2—C6−122.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···F2ii0.932.533.370 (3)151
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C2—H2⋯F2i0.932.533.370 (3)151

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Constitutional self-selection of [2 x 2] homonuclear grids from a dynamic mixture of copper(I) and silver(I) metal complexes.

Authors:  Mihail Barboiu; Eddy Petit; Arie van der Lee; Gavin Vaughan
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 5.165

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.