Literature DB >> 21581686

2,4-Difluoro-phenyl-boronic acid.

Patricia Rodríguez-Cuamatzi, Hugo Tlahuext, Herbert Höpfl.   

Abstract

The mol-ecular structure of the title compound, C(6)H(5)BF(2)O(2), is essentially planar (mean deviation = 0.019 Å), indicating electronic delocalization between the dihydroxy-boryl group and the aromatic ring. In the crystal structure, inversion dimers linked by two O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds arise. An intra-molecular O-H⋯F hydrogen bond reinforces the conformation and the same H atom is also involved in an inter-molecular O-H⋯F link, leading to mol-ecular sheets in the crystal.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21581686      PMCID: PMC2967960          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808040646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general backround to boronic acids, see: Hall (2005 ▶); Höpfl (2002 ▶); Fujita et al. (2008 ▶); Soloway et al. (1998 ▶). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶); Desiraju (2002 ▶). For related structures, see: Wu et al. (2006 ▶); Bradley et al. (1996 ▶); Horton et al. (2004 ▶). For crystal engineering, see: Fournier et al. (2003 ▶); Rodríguez-Cuamatzi et al. (2004 ▶, 2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H5BF2O2 M = 157.91 Monoclinic, a = 3.7617 (11) Å b = 12.347 (4) Å c = 14.620 (4) Å β = 95.450 (5)° V = 676.0 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.15 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.37 × 0.35 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.947, T max = 0.968 3196 measured reflections 1190 independent reflections 1012 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.127 S = 1.15 1190 reflections 106 parameters 2 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus-NT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus-NT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL-NT (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL-NT; molecular graphics: CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2003 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808040646/hb2865sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808040646/hb2865Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H5BF2O2F(000) = 320
Mr = 157.91Dx = 1.552 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point = 521–522 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 3.7617 (11) ÅCell parameters from 1052 reflections
b = 12.347 (4) Åθ = 2.3–26.2°
c = 14.620 (4) ŵ = 0.15 mm1
β = 95.450 (5)°T = 293 K
V = 676.0 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.37 × 0.35 × 0.22 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1190 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1012 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.028
Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2°
φ and ω scansh = −3→4
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)k = −14→12
Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.968l = −17→17
3196 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.127H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.15w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0442P)2 + 0.2673P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1190 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
106 parametersΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
B10.7704 (8)0.4548 (2)0.62567 (18)0.0452 (7)
O10.6825 (6)0.38623 (15)0.55419 (13)0.0695 (6)
H10.748 (9)0.3215 (9)0.562 (2)0.104*
O20.6880 (6)0.55977 (14)0.61557 (12)0.0630 (6)
H20.593 (8)0.577 (3)0.5632 (10)0.094*
F11.0385 (5)0.23728 (11)0.67473 (11)0.0768 (6)
F21.4329 (5)0.33016 (14)0.97634 (10)0.0822 (6)
C10.9591 (6)0.41789 (18)0.72069 (15)0.0424 (6)
C21.0796 (7)0.31430 (18)0.74175 (16)0.0470 (6)
C31.2380 (7)0.2819 (2)0.82553 (17)0.0539 (7)
H31.31380.21090.83630.065*
C41.2785 (7)0.3593 (2)0.89223 (17)0.0547 (7)
C51.1696 (8)0.4640 (2)0.87828 (17)0.0586 (7)
H51.20130.51500.92510.070*
C61.0119 (7)0.49169 (19)0.79282 (16)0.0498 (6)
H60.93710.56280.78270.060*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
B10.0451 (16)0.0425 (15)0.0471 (16)−0.0009 (12)−0.0005 (12)0.0033 (12)
O10.1000 (17)0.0484 (11)0.0540 (11)0.0158 (10)−0.0241 (10)−0.0009 (9)
O20.0850 (15)0.0441 (10)0.0552 (11)0.0087 (9)−0.0172 (10)0.0048 (8)
F10.1192 (15)0.0456 (9)0.0602 (10)0.0151 (9)−0.0187 (9)−0.0046 (7)
F20.1070 (14)0.0804 (12)0.0527 (10)−0.0120 (10)−0.0262 (9)0.0181 (8)
C10.0383 (13)0.0412 (13)0.0473 (13)−0.0039 (10)0.0019 (10)0.0048 (10)
C20.0523 (16)0.0410 (13)0.0467 (13)−0.0017 (11)0.0001 (11)0.0008 (10)
C30.0584 (17)0.0449 (14)0.0564 (15)0.0002 (12)−0.0053 (13)0.0124 (12)
C40.0579 (17)0.0613 (17)0.0426 (13)−0.0099 (13)−0.0075 (12)0.0135 (12)
C50.0696 (19)0.0552 (16)0.0489 (14)−0.0109 (13)−0.0058 (13)−0.0020 (12)
C60.0559 (16)0.0399 (13)0.0522 (14)−0.0011 (11)−0.0011 (12)0.0029 (11)
B1—O21.338 (3)C1—C61.394 (3)
B1—O11.361 (3)C2—C31.370 (3)
B1—C11.566 (3)C3—C41.363 (4)
O1—H10.841 (15)C3—H30.93
O2—H20.841 (15)C4—C51.366 (4)
F1—C21.364 (3)C5—C61.374 (3)
F2—C41.358 (3)C5—H50.93
C1—C21.382 (3)C6—H60.93
O2—B1—O1118.7 (2)C4—C3—H3121.8
O2—B1—C1117.4 (2)C2—C3—H3121.8
O1—B1—C1123.8 (2)F2—C4—C3118.1 (2)
B1—O1—H1116 (2)F2—C4—C5118.8 (2)
B1—O2—H2115 (2)C3—C4—C5123.0 (2)
C2—C1—C6114.6 (2)C4—C5—C6117.9 (2)
C2—C1—B1125.3 (2)C4—C5—H5121.0
C6—C1—B1120.1 (2)C6—C5—H5121.0
F1—C2—C3116.7 (2)C5—C6—C1122.9 (2)
F1—C2—C1118.2 (2)C5—C6—H6118.5
C3—C2—C1125.1 (2)C1—C6—H6118.5
C4—C3—C2116.4 (2)
O2—B1—C1—C2−176.5 (2)C1—C2—C3—C4−0.3 (4)
O1—B1—C1—C24.5 (4)C2—C3—C4—F2179.7 (2)
O2—B1—C1—C64.6 (4)C2—C3—C4—C50.0 (4)
O1—B1—C1—C6−174.5 (2)F2—C4—C5—C6−179.6 (2)
C6—C1—C2—F1−179.9 (2)C3—C4—C5—C60.1 (4)
B1—C1—C2—F11.1 (4)C4—C5—C6—C10.0 (4)
C6—C1—C2—C30.4 (4)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.3 (4)
B1—C1—C2—C3−178.6 (2)B1—C1—C6—C5178.8 (2)
F1—C2—C3—C4180.0 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···F10.84 (2)2.16 (3)2.799 (3)133 (2)
O1—H1···F2i0.84 (2)2.39 (2)3.086 (3)140 (3)
O2—H2···O1ii0.84 (2)1.97 (2)2.809 (3)174 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯F10.841 (15)2.16 (3)2.799 (3)133 (2)
O1—H1⋯F2i0.841 (15)2.39 (2)3.086 (3)140 (3)
O2—H2⋯O1ii0.841 (19)1.97 (2)2.809 (3)174 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  6 in total

1.  The Chemistry of Neutron Capture Therapy.

Authors:  Albert H. Soloway; Werner Tjarks; Beverly A. Barnum; Feng-Guang Rong; Rolf F. Barth; Iwona M. Codogni; J. Gerald Wilson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Modification of 2D water that contains hexameric units in chair and boat conformations--a contribution to the structural elucidation of bulk water.

Authors:  Patricia Rodríguez-Cuamatzi; Gabriela Vargas-Díaz; Herbert Höpfl
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Molecular tectonics. Use of the hydrogen bonding of boronic acids to direct supramolecular construction.

Authors:  Jean-Hugues Fournier; Thierry Maris; James D Wuest; Wenzhuo Guo; Elena Galoppini
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Boronic acids in molecular self-assembly.

Authors:  Norifumi Fujita; Seiji Shinkai; Tony D James
Journal:  Chem Asian J       Date:  2008-07-07

Review 6.  Hydrogen bridges in crystal engineering: interactions without borders.

Authors:  Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 22.384

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.