Literature DB >> 21581607

4,4-Diacetyl-hepta-nedinitrile.

Guo-Wei Wang, Jian Zhang, Ling-Hua Zhuang, Wen-Yuan Wu, Jin-Tang Wang.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(11)H(14)N(2)O(2), contains one half-mol-ecule as the central C atom of the mol-ecule lies on a twofold rotation axis. In the crystal structure, weak inter-molecular C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into zigzag chains along c.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21581607      PMCID: PMC2967936          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808039962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For details of the biological activity of amino­thia­zoles, see: Kabalka & Mereddy (2006 ▶). For their use in organic synthesis, see: Kim et al. (2001 ▶); Ranu & Banerjee (2005 ▶); Ranu et al. (2006 ▶); Wang et al. (2008 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H14N2O2 M = 206.24 Monoclinic, a = 12.562 (3) Å b = 7.8700 (16) Å c = 10.941 (2) Å β = 84.91 (3)° V = 1077.4 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.961, T max = 0.991 1009 measured reflections 974 independent reflections 758 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: 9%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.071 wR(F 2) = 0.152 S = 1.00 974 reflections 70 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808039962/sj2557sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808039962/sj2557Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H14N2O2F(000) = 440
Mr = 206.24Dx = 1.271 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 12.562 (3) Åθ = 10–13°
b = 7.8700 (16) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 10.941 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 84.91 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 1077.4 (4) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer758 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.024
graphiteθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 3.1°
ω/2θ scansh = −14→15
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = 0→9
Tmin = 0.961, Tmax = 0.991l = 0→13
1009 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 200 reflections
974 independent reflections intensity decay: 9%
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.071Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.152H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0339P)2 + 4.1549P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
974 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
70 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Experimental. 1H NMR (DMSO, δ, p.p.m.) 2.15 (s, 6H), 2.23 (t, 4H), 2.31(t, 4H).
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O0.65270 (17)−0.0258 (3)0.3475 (2)0.0523 (7)
N0.3630 (3)0.4652 (4)0.5714 (3)0.0646 (9)
C10.6246 (3)−0.1760 (4)0.1653 (3)0.0495 (9)
H1A0.6530−0.12100.09120.074*
H1B0.5608−0.23680.15030.074*
H1C0.6765−0.25410.19200.074*
C20.5988 (2)−0.0454 (4)0.2629 (3)0.0369 (7)
C30.50000.0686 (5)0.25000.0288 (8)
C40.3719 (2)0.3939 (4)0.4802 (3)0.0442 (8)
C50.3865 (3)0.3008 (4)0.3639 (3)0.0440 (8)
H5A0.40020.38020.29660.053*
H5B0.32180.23830.35110.053*
C60.4802 (2)0.1776 (4)0.3665 (2)0.0341 (7)
H6A0.46700.10290.43670.041*
H6B0.54450.24210.37770.041*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O0.0447 (12)0.0599 (15)0.0551 (13)0.0160 (11)−0.0197 (10)−0.0091 (12)
N0.072 (2)0.0551 (19)0.0633 (19)0.0016 (17)0.0109 (15)−0.0178 (17)
C10.0502 (19)0.0408 (19)0.057 (2)0.0116 (15)−0.0038 (15)−0.0075 (16)
C20.0355 (15)0.0341 (16)0.0418 (16)0.0002 (13)−0.0073 (12)0.0048 (13)
C30.0305 (18)0.0244 (19)0.0319 (19)0.000−0.0057 (15)0.000
C40.0466 (17)0.0325 (16)0.0519 (19)0.0021 (14)0.0048 (14)−0.0001 (15)
C50.0497 (18)0.0375 (17)0.0440 (17)0.0072 (14)−0.0005 (13)−0.0057 (14)
C60.0423 (15)0.0281 (15)0.0324 (14)0.0013 (12)−0.0058 (11)0.0006 (12)
O—C21.205 (3)C3—C61.538 (3)
N—C41.142 (4)C4—C51.466 (4)
C1—C21.497 (4)C5—C61.528 (4)
C1—H1A0.9600C5—H5A0.9700
C1—H1B0.9600C5—H5B0.9700
C1—H1C0.9600C6—H6A0.9700
C2—C31.547 (3)C6—H6B0.9700
C2—C1—H1A109.5N—C4—C5178.3 (4)
C2—C1—H1B109.5C4—C5—C6109.8 (3)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C4—C5—H5A109.7
C2—C1—H1C109.5C6—C5—H5A109.7
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C4—C5—H5B109.7
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C6—C5—H5B109.7
O—C2—C1122.3 (3)H5A—C5—H5B108.2
O—C2—C3120.4 (3)C5—C6—C3114.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3117.2 (2)C5—C6—H6A108.8
C6—C3—C6i112.2 (3)C3—C6—H6A108.8
C6—C3—C2i109.09 (15)C5—C6—H6B108.8
C6—C3—C2108.63 (15)C3—C6—H6B108.8
C2i—C3—C2109.2 (3)H6A—C6—H6B107.6
O—C2—C3—C6−7.9 (4)C1—C2—C3—C2i54.4 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C6173.3 (3)C4—C5—C6—C3178.0 (2)
O—C2—C3—C6i114.6 (3)C6i—C3—C6—C557.5 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C6i−64.2 (3)C2i—C3—C6—C5−62.9 (3)
O—C2—C3—C2i−126.8 (3)C2—C3—C6—C5178.1 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C6—H6B···Nii0.972.663.533 (5)150
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C6—H6B⋯Ni0.972.663.533 (5)150

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Ionic liquid as catalyst and reaction medium. The dramatic influence of a task-specific ionic liquid, [bmIm]OH, in Michael addition of active methylene compounds to conjugated ketones, carboxylic esters, and nitriles.

Authors:  Brindaban C Ranu; Subhash Banerjee
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.005

3.  Dimethyl 2,2-bis-(2-cyano-ethyl)malonate.

Authors:  Guo-Wei Wang; Ling-Hua Zhuang; Wen-Yuan Wu; Jin-Tang Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-04-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.