Literature DB >> 21580661

1,3-Bis(bromo-meth-yl)-2-nitro-benzene.

Muhammad Nadeem Arshad, Katheryne Zumberge Edson, Scott T Mough, K Travis Holman.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(7)Br(2)NO(2), an inter-mediate for the synthesis of macrocycles, the NO(2) group makes a dihedral angle of 65.07 (19)° with the arene ring, and the bromo-methyl substituents adopt a trans conformation about the ring such that the mol-ecule closely approximates C2 symmetry.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21580661      PMCID: PMC2984041          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000718X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Li et al. (2006 ▶); Qin et al. (2005 ▶). For related compounds, see: Raatikainen et al. (2008 ▶); Mough et al. (2004 ▶). For the synthesis, see: Boeckmann & Vögtle (1981 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H7Br2NO2 M = 308.97 Monoclinic, a = 7.7837 (13) Å b = 7.7573 (13) Å c = 15.938 (3) Å β = 90.933 (3)° V = 962.2 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 8.39 mm−1 T = 185 K 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1K diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.285, T max = 0.553 8228 measured reflections 2259 independent reflections 1812 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.083 S = 1.06 2259 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.35 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.31 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and X-SEED (Barbour, 2001 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000718X/ng2729sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000718X/ng2729Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H7Br2NO2F(000) = 592
Mr = 308.97Dx = 2.133 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1024 reflections
a = 7.7837 (13) Åθ = 2.6–28.0°
b = 7.7573 (13) ŵ = 8.39 mm1
c = 15.938 (3) ÅT = 185 K
β = 90.933 (3)°Needles, colorless
V = 962.2 (3) Å30.20 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART 1K diffractometer2259 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1812 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.041
ω scanθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.285, Tmax = 0.553k = −10→10
8228 measured reflectionsl = −21→20
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.083H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0289P)2 + 1.9462P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2259 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 1.35 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.31 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.20766 (5)0.59088 (5)0.74548 (2)0.03326 (13)
Br20.26732 (6)0.86865 (6)0.32665 (3)0.04186 (15)
C10.2474 (4)0.6504 (4)0.5246 (2)0.0211 (7)
N10.2391 (4)0.8324 (4)0.55227 (19)0.0245 (7)
C20.1776 (4)0.6087 (4)0.4461 (2)0.0203 (7)
C30.1891 (5)0.4378 (5)0.4212 (2)0.0238 (8)
H30.14500.40510.36760.029*
O10.3753 (4)0.9089 (4)0.5617 (2)0.0434 (8)
C60.3228 (4)0.5301 (5)0.5786 (2)0.0205 (7)
C50.3295 (5)0.3604 (5)0.5504 (2)0.0249 (8)
H50.38070.27500.58550.030*
C70.3935 (5)0.5748 (5)0.6637 (2)0.0281 (8)
H7A0.45500.68640.66100.034*
H7B0.47680.48540.68200.034*
O20.0993 (4)0.8953 (4)0.5634 (2)0.0426 (8)
C40.2638 (5)0.3131 (5)0.4729 (2)0.0260 (8)
H40.26950.19650.45500.031*
C80.0943 (5)0.7371 (5)0.3889 (2)0.0259 (8)
H8A0.02390.81740.42220.031*
H8B0.01700.67660.34870.031*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0391 (2)0.0396 (2)0.0212 (2)−0.00245 (18)0.00494 (16)−0.00610 (16)
Br20.0346 (2)0.0541 (3)0.0370 (3)−0.0017 (2)0.00213 (18)0.0232 (2)
C10.0198 (17)0.0187 (17)0.0247 (18)−0.0006 (14)0.0027 (14)−0.0005 (14)
N10.0324 (18)0.0223 (16)0.0188 (15)0.0027 (13)−0.0022 (13)0.0000 (12)
C20.0161 (16)0.0231 (18)0.0218 (18)−0.0003 (14)0.0033 (14)0.0018 (14)
C30.0227 (18)0.030 (2)0.0190 (18)−0.0043 (15)0.0030 (15)−0.0041 (15)
O10.0381 (17)0.0343 (16)0.058 (2)−0.0126 (14)0.0095 (15)−0.0141 (15)
C60.0153 (16)0.0287 (18)0.0175 (17)−0.0005 (14)0.0020 (14)0.0005 (14)
C50.0254 (19)0.0218 (17)0.028 (2)0.0038 (15)0.0060 (16)0.0076 (15)
C70.0247 (19)0.038 (2)0.0215 (19)0.0002 (16)−0.0013 (15)0.0014 (16)
O20.0310 (16)0.0359 (16)0.061 (2)0.0146 (13)−0.0064 (15)−0.0158 (15)
C40.0258 (19)0.0215 (18)0.031 (2)−0.0022 (15)0.0074 (16)−0.0021 (15)
C80.0228 (19)0.031 (2)0.0236 (19)−0.0007 (16)0.0001 (15)0.0058 (15)
Br1—C71.967 (4)C3—H30.9500
Br2—C81.971 (4)C6—C51.392 (5)
C1—C61.392 (5)C6—C71.497 (5)
C1—C21.395 (5)C5—C41.379 (5)
C1—N11.480 (5)C5—H50.9500
N1—O21.209 (4)C7—H7A0.9900
N1—O11.222 (4)C7—H7B0.9900
C2—C31.387 (5)C4—H40.9500
C2—C81.491 (5)C8—H8A0.9900
C3—C41.392 (5)C8—H8B0.9900
C6—C1—C2123.6 (3)C6—C5—H5119.2
C6—C1—N1118.4 (3)C6—C7—Br1110.6 (2)
C2—C1—N1118.0 (3)C6—C7—H7A109.5
O2—N1—O1124.5 (3)Br1—C7—H7A109.5
O2—N1—C1118.2 (3)C6—C7—H7B109.5
O1—N1—C1117.3 (3)Br1—C7—H7B109.5
C3—C2—C1116.9 (3)H7A—C7—H7B108.1
C3—C2—C8119.6 (3)C5—C4—C3119.4 (3)
C1—C2—C8123.5 (3)C5—C4—H4120.3
C2—C3—C4121.6 (3)C3—C4—H4120.3
C2—C3—H3119.2C2—C8—Br2111.1 (2)
C4—C3—H3119.2C2—C8—H8A109.4
C1—C6—C5116.9 (3)Br2—C8—H8A109.4
C1—C6—C7123.3 (3)C2—C8—H8B109.4
C5—C6—C7119.7 (3)Br2—C8—H8B109.4
C4—C5—C6121.7 (3)H8A—C8—H8B108.0
C4—C5—H5119.2
C6—C1—N1—O2−115.0 (4)N1—C1—C6—C5−179.6 (3)
C2—C1—N1—O264.5 (5)C2—C1—C6—C7−178.4 (3)
C6—C1—N1—O165.5 (5)N1—C1—C6—C71.0 (5)
C2—C1—N1—O1−115.1 (4)C1—C6—C5—C4−0.3 (5)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.5 (5)C7—C6—C5—C4179.1 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3179.1 (3)C1—C6—C7—Br180.1 (4)
C6—C1—C2—C8179.0 (3)C5—C6—C7—Br1−99.3 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C8−0.4 (5)C6—C5—C4—C30.2 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C41.2 (5)C2—C3—C4—C5−0.6 (5)
C8—C2—C3—C4−179.2 (3)C3—C2—C8—Br2−98.9 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C51.0 (5)C1—C2—C8—Br280.6 (4)
  4 in total

1.  Isolation and structure of an "imploded" cryptophane.

Authors:  Scott T Mough; John C Goeltz; K Travis Holman
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Molecular Pacman: folding, inclusion, and X-ray structures of tri- and tetraamino piperazine cyclophanes.

Authors:  Kari Raatikainen; Juhani Huuskonen; Erkki Kolehmainen; Kari Rissanen
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.