Literature DB >> 21580487

(2R)-2-Methyl-piperazinediium tetra-chloridocuprate(II).

Li Zhaung Chen1, Sheng Wan.   

Abstract

In the title compound, (C(5)H(14)N(2))[CuCl(4)], the copper(II) ion has a slightly tetra-hedrally distorted square-planar coordin-ation geometry and the diprotonated piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal structure, cations and anions are linked by inter-molecular N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21580487      PMCID: PMC2984032          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810007877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the ferroelectric and non-linear optical properties of chiral organic ligands, see: Fu et al. (2007 ▶); Qu et al. (2003 ▶). For transition metal complexes of 2-methyl­piperazine, see: Ye et al. (2009 ▶). For puckering parameters, see: Cremer & Pople (1975 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C5H14N2)[CuCl4] M = 307.53 Orthorhombic, a = 6.0169 (12) Å b = 12.985 (3) Å c = 14.644 (3) Å V = 1144.1 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.80 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.87, T max = 0.90 11992 measured reflections 2627 independent reflections 2469 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.051

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025 wR(F 2) = 0.060 S = 1.10 2627 reflections 111 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.53 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 1091 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.00 (3) Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810007877/rz2412sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810007877/rz2412Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C5H14N2)[CuCl4]F(000) = 620
Mr = 307.53Dx = 1.785 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2469 reflections
a = 6.0169 (12) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 12.985 (3) ŵ = 2.80 mm1
c = 14.644 (3) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1144.1 (4) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.30 × 0.25 × 0.22 mm
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer2627 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2469 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.051
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −16→16
Tmin = 0.87, Tmax = 0.90l = −18→18
11992 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0239P)2 + 0.0175P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.060(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.30 e Å3
2627 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.53 e Å3
111 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.193 (9)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1091 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapFlack parameter: 0.00 (3)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.82482 (13)1.34903 (5)0.01022 (5)0.0237 (3)
Cl40.8203 (3)1.32659 (11)0.17172 (9)0.0251 (4)
Cl30.8247 (3)1.17476 (11)−0.00811 (9)0.0256 (4)
Cl20.8317 (3)1.52141 (11)0.02454 (12)0.0365 (4)
Cl10.8196 (3)1.36387 (11)−0.14937 (10)0.0250 (4)
N10.8224 (9)1.0679 (4)0.1788 (3)0.0289 (11)
H1A0.93381.10630.15590.035*
H1B0.69321.09760.16260.035*
N20.6773 (9)0.8919 (4)0.2799 (3)0.0263 (11)
H2A0.80890.86380.29510.032*
H2B0.56920.85230.30380.032*
C50.6696 (17)0.7855 (5)0.1398 (5)0.055 (2)
H5C0.57020.74100.17250.083*
H5B0.81900.76030.14580.083*
H5A0.62880.78670.07640.083*
C20.6553 (12)0.8933 (5)0.1786 (4)0.0300 (14)
H2C0.50970.92210.16300.036*
C40.8395 (11)1.0661 (5)0.2797 (4)0.0309 (14)
H4B0.82271.13540.30350.037*
H4A0.98501.04080.29750.037*
C30.6623 (12)0.9975 (5)0.3195 (4)0.0304 (13)
H3B0.68010.99390.38530.036*
H3A0.51701.02640.30670.036*
C10.8335 (12)0.9624 (5)0.1390 (4)0.0323 (14)
H1D0.97860.93290.15120.039*
H1C0.81500.96660.07330.039*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0339 (4)0.0198 (4)0.0174 (4)−0.0001 (3)−0.0003 (3)0.0000 (3)
Cl40.0236 (7)0.0309 (8)0.0209 (7)−0.0006 (7)−0.0001 (7)−0.0035 (6)
Cl30.0392 (8)0.0197 (7)0.0178 (7)−0.0004 (7)0.0001 (7)0.0001 (5)
Cl20.0540 (10)0.0222 (8)0.0333 (9)−0.0006 (8)−0.0017 (10)−0.0016 (6)
Cl10.0238 (7)0.0308 (8)0.0205 (7)−0.0010 (7)−0.0001 (7)0.0047 (6)
N10.025 (2)0.034 (3)0.028 (3)−0.004 (3)0.000 (3)0.013 (2)
N20.026 (2)0.028 (3)0.024 (3)−0.004 (3)0.002 (3)0.011 (2)
C50.090 (6)0.035 (4)0.041 (5)−0.005 (5)−0.005 (6)0.000 (3)
C20.033 (3)0.031 (3)0.026 (3)−0.001 (3)−0.003 (3)0.007 (3)
C40.037 (3)0.031 (3)0.025 (3)−0.004 (3)−0.003 (3)0.009 (3)
C30.037 (3)0.032 (3)0.023 (3)0.001 (3)0.005 (3)0.006 (3)
C10.037 (3)0.039 (4)0.022 (3)0.000 (3)0.005 (3)0.007 (3)
Cu1—Cl22.2485 (16)C5—H5C0.9600
Cu1—Cl32.2788 (16)C5—H5B0.9600
Cu1—Cl12.3451 (15)C5—H5A0.9600
Cu1—Cl42.3831 (15)C2—C11.514 (9)
N1—C41.482 (8)C2—H2C0.9800
N1—C11.490 (8)C4—C31.506 (9)
N1—H1A0.9000C4—H4B0.9700
N1—H1B0.9000C4—H4A0.9700
N2—C21.489 (8)C3—H3B0.9700
N2—C31.492 (7)C3—H3A0.9700
N2—H2A0.9000C1—H1D0.9700
N2—H2B0.9000C1—H1C0.9700
C5—C21.513 (9)
Cl2—Cu1—Cl3178.25 (7)N2—C2—C5111.0 (5)
Cl2—Cu1—Cl190.66 (6)N2—C2—C1109.0 (5)
Cl3—Cu1—Cl187.95 (5)C5—C2—C1111.4 (6)
Cl2—Cu1—Cl491.68 (6)N2—C2—H2C108.5
Cl3—Cu1—Cl489.74 (5)C5—C2—H2C108.5
Cl1—Cu1—Cl4177.28 (6)C1—C2—H2C108.5
C4—N1—C1111.9 (4)N1—C4—C3110.3 (6)
C4—N1—H1A109.2N1—C4—H4B109.6
C1—N1—H1A109.2C3—C4—H4B109.6
C4—N1—H1B109.2N1—C4—H4A109.6
C1—N1—H1B109.2C3—C4—H4A109.6
H1A—N1—H1B107.9H4B—C4—H4A108.1
C2—N2—C3111.8 (4)N2—C3—C4110.5 (5)
C2—N2—H2A109.3N2—C3—H3B109.6
C3—N2—H2A109.3C4—C3—H3B109.6
C2—N2—H2B109.3N2—C3—H3A109.6
C3—N2—H2B109.3C4—C3—H3A109.6
H2A—N2—H2B107.9H3B—C3—H3A108.1
C2—C5—H5C109.5N1—C1—C2111.3 (5)
C2—C5—H5B109.5N1—C1—H1D109.4
H5C—C5—H5B109.5C2—C1—H1D109.4
C2—C5—H5A109.5N1—C1—H1C109.4
H5C—C5—H5A109.5C2—C1—H1C109.4
H5B—C5—H5A109.5H1D—C1—H1C108.0
C3—N2—C2—C5−179.7 (7)N1—C4—C3—N256.1 (7)
C3—N2—C2—C157.3 (7)C4—N1—C1—C256.4 (7)
C1—N1—C4—C3−55.8 (7)N2—C2—C1—N1−56.0 (7)
C2—N2—C3—C4−58.1 (7)C5—C2—C1—N1−178.8 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1i0.902.363.149 (6)147
N1—H1B···Cl1ii0.902.313.182 (6)163
N2—H2A···Cl4iii0.902.333.218 (6)168
N2—H2B···Cl4iv0.902.393.192 (6)148
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1i0.902.363.149 (6)147
N1—H1B⋯Cl1ii0.902.313.182 (6)163
N2—H2A⋯Cl4iii0.902.333.218 (6)168
N2—H2B⋯Cl4iv0.902.393.192 (6)148

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  4 in total

1.  Dielectric anisotropy of a homochiral trinuclear nickel(II) complex.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Qiong Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong; Tomoyuki Akutagawa; Takayoshi Nakamura; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Homochiral Zn and Cd coordination polymers containing amino acid-tetrazole ligands.

Authors:  Zhi-Rong Qu; Hong Zhao; Xi-Sen Wang; Yong-Hua Li; Yu-Mei Song; Yu-Juan Liu; Qiong Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong; Brendan F Abrahams; Zi-Ling Xue; Xiao-Zeng You
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Hydrogen-bonded ferroelectrics based on metal-organic coordination.

Authors:  Heng-Yun Ye; Da-Wei Fu; Yi Zhang; Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.