Literature DB >> 21580196

Aluminium cyclo-hexa-phosphate.

Abdelghani Oudahmane, Aïcha Mbarek, Malika El-Ghozzi, Daniel Avignant.   

Abstract

Single crystals of the title compound, Al(2)P(6)O(18), were obtained by solid-state reaction. The monoclinic structure is isotypic with its Cr(III), Ga(III) and Ru(III) analogues and is built up of six-membered phosphate ring anions, P(6)O(18) (6-), isolated from each other and further linked by isolated AlO(6) octa-hedra by sharing corners. Each AlO(6) octa-hedron is linked to four P(6)O(18) (6-) rings. More accurately, two rings are linked through bidentate diphosphate groups attached in the cis-positions to the AlO(6) octa-hedron. The other two rings are linked to the two remaining corners, also in cis-positions of the AlO(6) octa-hedron.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21580196      PMCID: PMC2983707          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810005374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

The title compound was first synthesized by Kanene et al. (1985 ▶) and its unit cell determined from Weissenberg photographs. Isotypic compounds have been reported: Ga2P6O18 (Chudinova et al., 1987 ▶); Cr2P6O18 (Bagieu-Beucher & Guitel, 1977 ▶) and Ru2P6O18 (Fukuoka et al., 1995 ▶). For a review of the crystal chemistry of cyclo­hexa­phosphates, see: Durif (1995 ▶, 2005 ▶). For applications of aluminium phosphate, see: Vippola et al. (2000 ▶). For the structures of other cyclo­hexa­phosphates with the P6O18 6− anion, see: Averbuch-Pouchot & Durif (1991a ▶,b ▶,c ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

Al2P6O18 M = 527.79 Monoclinic, a = 6.0931 (2) Å b = 15.0676 (4) Å c = 8.2016 (3) Å β = 105.166 (1)° V = 726.75 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.96 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.16 × 0.07 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.860, T max = 0.945 6548 measured reflections 1674 independent reflections 1398 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.035

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.130 S = 1.16 1674 reflections 118 parameters Δρmax = 0.56 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.71 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: CaRine (Boudias & Monceau, 1998 ▶) and ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810005374/wm2303sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810005374/wm2303Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Al2P6O18F(000) = 520
Mr = 527.79Dx = 2.412 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2041 reflections
a = 6.0931 (2) Åθ = 3.5–27.5°
b = 15.0676 (4) ŵ = 0.96 mm1
c = 8.2016 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 105.166 (1)°Rhombic, colourless
V = 726.75 (4) Å30.16 × 0.07 × 0.06 mm
Z = 2
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1674 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1398 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.035
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.7°
φ and ω scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)k = −11→19
Tmin = 0.860, Tmax = 0.945l = −10→10
6548 measured reflections
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.130w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0787P)2 + 0.2264P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.16(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1674 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.56 e Å3
118 parametersΔρmin = −0.71 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.70149 (15)0.33738 (5)0.01706 (11)0.0049 (2)
P20.64525 (14)0.04431 (5)0.21869 (11)0.0050 (2)
P30.08497 (14)0.11301 (5)−0.20937 (11)0.0054 (2)
Al0.61549 (17)0.13831 (6)−0.12313 (13)0.0046 (3)
O10.3051 (4)0.15855 (15)−0.1454 (3)0.0082 (5)
O2−0.0766 (4)0.11484 (16)−0.1026 (3)0.0090 (5)
O30.6755 (4)0.25850 (15)−0.0920 (3)0.0078 (5)
O40.6653 (4)0.12162 (15)0.1117 (3)0.0076 (5)
O50.5656 (4)0.34555 (16)0.1415 (3)0.0084 (5)
O60.4448 (4)−0.01495 (15)0.1608 (3)0.0073 (5)
O70.6509 (5)0.42395 (15)−0.0967 (3)0.0109 (5)
O80.8737 (4)−0.01227 (15)0.2539 (3)0.0110 (5)
O90.9653 (4)0.34779 (16)0.1085 (3)0.0107 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0052 (5)0.0050 (4)0.0042 (5)−0.0007 (3)0.0008 (3)0.0001 (3)
P20.0060 (5)0.0041 (4)0.0050 (5)−0.0003 (3)0.0014 (3)−0.0009 (3)
P30.0036 (5)0.0058 (4)0.0069 (5)0.0007 (3)0.0015 (3)0.0002 (3)
Al0.0034 (5)0.0055 (5)0.0052 (5)−0.0006 (4)0.0015 (4)−0.0003 (3)
O10.0045 (12)0.0065 (12)0.0136 (13)−0.0012 (9)0.0025 (10)−0.0021 (9)
O20.0050 (12)0.0127 (12)0.0094 (13)−0.0002 (9)0.0024 (10)0.0014 (10)
O30.0110 (13)0.0045 (11)0.0077 (12)−0.0028 (9)0.0020 (10)−0.0015 (9)
O40.0119 (13)0.0059 (11)0.0053 (12)−0.0022 (9)0.0025 (10)−0.0007 (9)
O50.0066 (13)0.0132 (12)0.0057 (12)0.0000 (9)0.0020 (10)0.0003 (9)
O60.0060 (12)0.0063 (12)0.0098 (12)0.0002 (9)0.0025 (10)−0.0012 (9)
O70.0221 (15)0.0059 (12)0.0053 (12)0.0033 (9)0.0045 (11)0.0022 (9)
O80.0061 (12)0.0073 (12)0.0175 (14)−0.0004 (9)−0.0007 (10)−0.0038 (9)
O90.0052 (13)0.0186 (13)0.0084 (13)−0.0021 (10)0.0019 (10)−0.0062 (10)
P1—O31.471 (2)Al—O31.852 (2)
P1—O51.478 (2)Al—O2iv1.873 (3)
P1—O71.587 (2)Al—O11.877 (3)
P1—O91.594 (3)Al—O41.887 (3)
P2—O41.482 (2)Al—O5v1.889 (3)
P2—O61.487 (2)Al—O6iii1.904 (2)
P2—O7i1.579 (2)O2—Alvi1.873 (3)
P2—O81.593 (2)O5—Ali1.889 (3)
P3—O11.476 (2)O6—Aliii1.904 (2)
P3—O21.479 (3)O7—P2v1.579 (2)
P3—O9ii1.594 (2)O8—P3iii1.597 (2)
P3—O8iii1.597 (2)O9—P3vii1.594 (3)
O3—P1—O5119.77 (14)O3—Al—O490.93 (11)
O3—P1—O7109.47 (14)O2iv—Al—O489.61 (11)
O5—P1—O7106.27 (14)O1—Al—O490.56 (12)
O3—P1—O9107.50 (14)O3—Al—O5v89.33 (11)
O5—P1—O9110.17 (14)O2iv—Al—O5v90.32 (11)
O7—P1—O9102.27 (14)O1—Al—O5v89.50 (11)
O4—P2—O6118.09 (14)O4—Al—O5v179.74 (12)
O4—P2—O7i110.17 (13)O3—Al—O6iii178.54 (12)
O6—P2—O7i107.36 (14)O2iv—Al—O6iii88.66 (11)
O4—P2—O8108.93 (14)O1—Al—O6iii89.77 (11)
O6—P2—O8110.01 (13)O4—Al—O6iii90.46 (11)
O7i—P2—O8100.91 (14)O5v—Al—O6iii89.29 (11)
O1—P3—O2117.68 (15)P3—O1—Al139.30 (16)
O1—P3—O9ii108.14 (14)P3—O2—Alvi139.15 (17)
O2—P3—O9ii109.62 (14)P1—O3—Al149.33 (16)
O1—P3—O8iii109.89 (14)P2—O4—Al133.84 (15)
O2—P3—O8iii108.82 (14)P1—O5—Ali138.32 (16)
O9ii—P3—O8iii101.47 (14)P2—O6—Aliii138.20 (15)
O3—Al—O2iv90.88 (11)P2v—O7—P1139.91 (16)
O3—Al—O190.69 (11)P2—O8—P3iii130.56 (16)
O2iv—Al—O1178.43 (11)P1—O9—P3vii129.42 (16)
P1—O31.471 (2)
P1—O51.478 (2)
P1—O71.587 (2)
P1—O91.594 (3)
P2—O41.482 (2)
P2—O61.487 (2)
P2—O7i1.579 (2)
P2—O81.593 (2)
P3—O11.476 (2)
P3—O21.479 (3)
P3—O9ii1.594 (2)
P3—O8iii1.597 (2)
Al—O31.852 (2)
Al—O2iv1.873 (3)
Al—O11.877 (3)
Al—O41.887 (3)
Al—O5v1.889 (3)
Al—O6iii1.904 (2)
P2v—O7—P1139.91 (16)
P2—O8—P3iii130.56 (16)
P1—O9—P3vi129.42 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

  1 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Vibrational characteristics of aluminum-phosphate compounds by an experimental and theoretical approach.

Authors:  Pawel Goj; Bartosz Handke; Pawel Stoch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Interaction of Aluminum Metaphosphates in the Setting of Potassium Silicate Solutions in Terms of the Crystalline Phase Composition.

Authors:  Ali Masoudi Alavi; Almuth Sax; Peter Quirmbach
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.911

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.