Literature DB >> 21580065

N-(6-Methyl-2-pyrid-yl)formamide.

Hui-Ling Hu, Chia-Jun Wu, Pei-Chi Cheng, Jhy-Der Chen.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(7)H(8)N(2)O, is essentially planar with a maximum deviation of 0.0439 (1) Å from the best plane. In the crystal, N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between self-complementary amide groups join mol-ecules into centrosymmetric dimers.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21580065      PMCID: PMC2980114          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809053549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Hosmane et al. (1984 ▶). For background to this work, see: Wang et al. (2006 ▶). For the structure of 2-pyridylformamide, see: Bock et al. (1996 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H8N2O M = 136.15 Triclinic, a = 4.0611 (6) Å b = 8.6232 (12) Å c = 10.3231 (12) Å α = 87.421 (12)° β = 79.344 (14)° γ = 83.103 (15)° V = 352.61 (8) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.5 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Bruker P4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan(XSCANS; Siemens, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.713, T max = 0.940 1757 measured reflections 1222 independent reflections 993 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.031 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.050 wR(F 2) = 0.148 S = 1.05 1222 reflections 92 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1995 ▶); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809053549/gk2247sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809053549/gk2247Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H8N2OZ = 2
Mr = 136.15F(000) = 144
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.282 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.0611 (6) ÅCell parameters from 23 reflections
b = 8.6232 (12) Åθ = 8.8–16.8°
c = 10.3231 (12) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
α = 87.421 (12)°T = 295 K
β = 79.344 (14)°Plate, colorless
γ = 83.103 (15)°0.5 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm
V = 352.61 (8) Å3
Bruker P4 diffractometer993 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.031
graphiteθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 4.6°
ω scansh = −4→1
Absorption correction: ψ scan (XSCANS; Siemens, 1995)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.713, Tmax = 0.940l = −12→12
1757 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1222 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.148H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0874P)2 + 0.0372P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1222 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.15 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
Experimental. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O1.4562 (3)0.34810 (14)0.62540 (13)0.0766 (5)
N11.1428 (3)0.58235 (15)0.62843 (12)0.0528 (4)
H1A1.24380.60420.55010.063*
N20.7461 (3)0.66352 (15)0.81236 (13)0.0509 (4)
C10.3445 (5)0.7290 (3)1.01096 (18)0.0728 (6)
H1B0.37740.61761.02350.109*0.50
H1C0.10760.76341.02120.109*0.50
H1D0.43880.77801.07510.109*0.50
H1E0.23840.82171.05640.109*0.50
H1F0.50830.67591.05870.109*0.50
H1G0.17710.66131.00480.109*0.50
C20.5164 (4)0.77275 (19)0.87483 (16)0.0553 (5)
C30.4394 (5)0.9158 (2)0.8175 (2)0.0685 (5)
H3A0.28290.99060.86370.082*
C40.5969 (5)0.9474 (2)0.6904 (2)0.0717 (6)
H4A0.54621.04350.64980.086*
C50.8283 (4)0.8360 (2)0.62478 (18)0.0609 (5)
H5A0.93510.85360.53850.073*
C60.8977 (4)0.69680 (18)0.69102 (15)0.0480 (4)
C71.2323 (4)0.4432 (2)0.67961 (16)0.0621 (5)
H7A1.11650.41640.76240.075*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O0.0884 (9)0.0587 (8)0.0646 (8)0.0094 (7)0.0201 (7)0.0038 (6)
N10.0586 (8)0.0521 (8)0.0424 (7)−0.0075 (6)0.0051 (6)0.0000 (6)
N20.0505 (8)0.0535 (8)0.0467 (7)−0.0083 (6)−0.0011 (6)−0.0051 (6)
C10.0666 (11)0.0840 (13)0.0597 (11)−0.0036 (9)0.0098 (9)−0.0148 (9)
C20.0468 (9)0.0588 (9)0.0589 (10)−0.0068 (7)−0.0031 (7)−0.0124 (8)
C30.0574 (10)0.0579 (10)0.0857 (13)−0.0004 (8)−0.0027 (9)−0.0137 (9)
C40.0680 (11)0.0529 (10)0.0918 (14)−0.0039 (8)−0.0123 (10)0.0086 (9)
C50.0616 (10)0.0566 (10)0.0630 (10)−0.0121 (8)−0.0061 (8)0.0095 (8)
C60.0463 (8)0.0500 (9)0.0479 (8)−0.0112 (7)−0.0046 (6)−0.0036 (7)
C70.0702 (11)0.0563 (10)0.0493 (9)−0.0014 (8)0.0121 (8)0.0035 (7)
O—C71.2192 (19)C1—H1F0.9600
N1—C71.327 (2)C1—H1G0.9600
N1—C61.402 (2)C2—C31.371 (3)
N1—H1A0.8600C3—C41.380 (3)
N2—C61.325 (2)C3—H3A0.9300
N2—C21.339 (2)C4—C51.368 (3)
C1—C21.502 (2)C4—H4A0.9300
C1—H1B0.9600C5—C61.380 (2)
C1—H1C0.9600C5—H5A0.9300
C1—H1D0.9600C7—H7A0.9300
C1—H1E0.9600
C7—N1—C6125.62 (13)H1D—C1—H1G141.1
C7—N1—H1A117.2H1E—C1—H1G109.5
C6—N1—H1A117.2H1F—C1—H1G109.5
C6—N2—C2117.87 (15)N2—C2—C3122.02 (16)
C2—C1—H1B109.5N2—C2—C1116.18 (15)
C2—C1—H1C109.5C3—C2—C1121.80 (16)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C2—C3—C4119.19 (17)
C2—C1—H1D109.5C2—C3—H3A120.4
H1B—C1—H1D109.5C4—C3—H3A120.4
H1C—C1—H1D109.5C5—C4—C3119.38 (17)
C2—C1—H1E109.5C5—C4—H4A120.3
H1B—C1—H1E141.1C3—C4—H4A120.3
H1C—C1—H1E56.3C4—C5—C6117.69 (17)
H1D—C1—H1E56.3C4—C5—H5A121.2
C2—C1—H1F109.5C6—C5—H5A121.2
H1B—C1—H1F56.3N2—C6—C5123.81 (16)
H1C—C1—H1F141.1N2—C6—N1117.00 (14)
H1D—C1—H1F56.3C5—C6—N1119.19 (14)
H1E—C1—H1F109.5O—C7—N1124.40 (15)
C2—C1—H1G109.5O—C7—H7A117.8
H1B—C1—H1G56.3N1—C7—H7A117.8
H1C—C1—H1G56.3
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Oi0.862.042.8971 (19)172
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Oi0.862.042.8971 (19)172

Symmetry code: (i) .

  1 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  N-(2-Eth-oxy-phen-yl)formamide.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Rofouei; Jafar Attar Gharamaleki; Fereshteh Younesian; Giuseppe Bruno; Hadi Amiri Rudbari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-01-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.