Literature DB >> 21579893

2-Bromo-pyridine-3-carboxylic acid.

R Alan Howie, Raoni S Gonçalves, Marcus V N de Souza, Edward R T Tiekink, James L Wardell.   

Abstract

The carboxylic acid residue in the title compound, C(6)H(4)Brn class="Chemical">NO(2), is twisted out of the plane of the other atoms, as indicated by the (Br)C-C-C-O(carbon-yl) torsion angle of -20.1 (9)°. In the crystal, supra-molecular chains mediated by O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds are formed with base vector [201] and C-H⋯O inter-actions reinforce the packing.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579893      PMCID: PMC2979810          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810003314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of N-heterocylic compounds, see: de Souza (2005 ▶); Cunico et al. (2006 ▶). For related structures, see: Wright & King (1953 ▶); Kutoglu & Scheringer (1983 ▶); de Souza et al. (2005 ▶); Kaiser et al. (2009 ▶). For the synthesis, see: Bradlow & van der Werf (1949 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H4BrNO2 M = 202.01 Monoclinic, a = 3.9286 (3) Å b = 12.9737 (9) Å c = 12.8570 (8) Å β = 96.695 (4)° V = 650.83 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 6.24 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.10 × 0.09 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.453, T max = 0.607 7699 measured reflections 1147 independent reflections 882 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.070

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.093 S = 1.06 1147 reflections 92 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.86 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.62 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶) and COLLECT; data reduction: DEn class="Chemical">NZO and COLLECT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810003314/hb5318sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810003314/hb5318Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H4BrNO2F(000) = 392
Mr = 202.01Dx = 2.062 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 24006 reflections
a = 3.9286 (3) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 12.9737 (9) ŵ = 6.24 mm1
c = 12.8570 (8) ÅT = 120 K
β = 96.695 (4)°Block, colourless
V = 650.83 (8) Å30.10 × 0.09 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer1147 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enraf Nonius FR591 rotating anode882 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
10 cm confocal mirrorsRint = 0.070
Detector resolution: 9.091 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.2°
φ and ω scansh = −4→4
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007)k = −15→15
Tmin = 0.453, Tmax = 0.607l = −15→13
7699 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.093H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0439P)2 + 1.1585P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1147 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.86 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.62 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br0.26644 (13)0.59770 (4)0.89357 (4)0.0284 (2)
O1−0.1485 (10)0.8088 (3)0.6204 (3)0.0329 (9)
H1−0.25630.77830.56910.049*
O20.0225 (11)0.6488 (3)0.6647 (3)0.0484 (12)
N10.5499 (10)0.7843 (3)0.9471 (3)0.0257 (10)
C20.3563 (13)0.7384 (4)0.8676 (4)0.0237 (11)
C30.2287 (12)0.7899 (4)0.7756 (4)0.0246 (11)
C40.3069 (14)0.8942 (4)0.7698 (4)0.0303 (12)
H40.21930.93270.70980.036*
C50.5111 (13)0.9428 (4)0.8507 (4)0.0252 (12)
H50.56881.01370.84610.030*
C60.6276 (13)0.8854 (4)0.9378 (4)0.0268 (12)
H60.76790.91790.99350.032*
C70.0240 (13)0.7406 (4)0.6822 (4)0.0290 (12)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br0.0342 (3)0.0217 (3)0.0277 (3)−0.0033 (2)−0.0029 (2)0.0016 (2)
O10.042 (2)0.030 (2)0.025 (2)0.0023 (18)−0.0059 (17)−0.0007 (16)
O20.072 (3)0.027 (2)0.041 (2)0.009 (2)−0.018 (2)−0.0066 (19)
N10.031 (2)0.024 (2)0.023 (2)0.0023 (19)0.0034 (19)−0.0008 (19)
C20.021 (2)0.024 (3)0.026 (3)0.002 (2)0.005 (2)−0.001 (2)
C30.023 (3)0.026 (3)0.024 (3)0.005 (2)0.002 (2)−0.003 (2)
C40.035 (3)0.025 (3)0.029 (3)0.003 (2)−0.003 (2)0.003 (2)
C50.030 (3)0.020 (3)0.026 (3)−0.001 (2)0.003 (2)−0.003 (2)
C60.027 (3)0.028 (3)0.024 (3)0.000 (2)−0.002 (2)−0.007 (2)
C70.028 (3)0.031 (3)0.027 (3)0.003 (2)0.000 (2)0.002 (2)
Br—C21.897 (5)C3—C41.392 (7)
O1—C71.322 (6)C3—C71.507 (7)
O1—H10.8400C4—C51.388 (7)
O2—C71.213 (6)C4—H40.9500
N1—C21.340 (6)C5—C61.378 (7)
N1—C61.356 (6)C5—H50.9500
C2—C31.400 (7)C6—H60.9500
C7—O1—H1109.5C3—C4—H4119.5
C2—N1—C6118.4 (4)C6—C5—C4118.1 (5)
N1—C2—C3123.3 (5)C6—C5—H5121.0
N1—C2—Br113.2 (3)C4—C5—H5121.0
C3—C2—Br123.5 (4)N1—C6—C5122.6 (4)
C4—C3—C2116.7 (5)N1—C6—H6118.7
C4—C3—C7118.1 (4)C5—C6—H6118.7
C2—C3—C7125.2 (4)O2—C7—O1123.7 (5)
C5—C4—C3120.9 (5)O2—C7—C3123.8 (5)
C5—C4—H4119.5O1—C7—C3112.6 (4)
C2—C3—C7—O1161.1 (5)C2—C3—C7—O2−20.1 (9)
C4—C3—C7—O1−20.7 (7)C4—C3—C7—O2158.1 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N1i0.841.852.685 (5)173
C5—H5···O2ii0.952.393.258 (7)152
C6—H6···O2iii0.952.473.171 (6)131
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1i0.841.852.685 (5)173
C5—H5⋯O2ii0.952.393.258 (7)152
C6—H6⋯O2iii0.952.473.171 (6)131

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

Review 1.  New fluoroquinolones: a class of potent antibiotics.

Authors:  Marcus Vinícius Nora De Souza
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.862

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Antimalarial activity of 4-(5-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-chloroquine analogues.

Authors:  Wilson Cunico; Cleber A Cechinel; Helio G Bonacorso; Marcos A P Martins; Nilo Zanatta; Marcus V N de Souza; Isabela O Freitas; Rodrigo P P Soares; Antoniana U Krettli
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 2.823

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.