Literature DB >> 21579585

Redetermination of di-μ-hydroxido-bis-[diaqua-chlorido-dioxido-uranium(VI)] from single-crystal synchrotron data.

Diederik Huys, Rik Van Deun, Phil Pattison, Luc Van Meervelt, Kristof Van Hecke.   

Abstract

The title compound, [(UO(2))(2)Cl(2)(OH)(2)(H(2)O)(4)], was obtained unintentionally as the product of an attempted reaction between uranium(VI) oxide dihydrate, UO(3)·2H(2)O, and hydrogen bis-(trifluoro-methyl-sulfon-yl)imide (HTf(2)N), in an experiment to obtain crystals of uranyl bis-(trifluoro-methyl-sulfon-yl)imide, UO(2)(Tf(2)N)(2)·xH(2)O. The structure consists of neutral dimers of uranyl (UO(2) (2+)) units, double bridged by OH(-) anions. Each uranyl unit is surrounded by one Cl and four O atoms, which form an irregular penta-gon, in a plane perpendicular to the linear uranyl groups. The coordination geometry around each U atom can be considered to be distorted penta-gonal-bipyramidal. In the crystal structure the uranyl dimers are connected to each other by hydrogen-bonding inter-actions [O⋯Cl = 3.23 (1) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579585      PMCID: PMC2979817          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810002394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the use of uranyl bis­(trifluoro­methyl­sulfon­yl)imide as a starting material for the study of the spectroscopic properties of uranyl complexes in ionic liquids, see: Nockemann et al. (2007 ▶); Binnemans (2007 ▶). For the original published structure determined from Weissenberg data, see: Åberg (1969 ▶). For related structures, see: Åberg (1970 ▶); Tsushima et al. (2007 ▶). For databases of inorganic structures, see: Bergerhoff et al. (1983 ▶); ICSD (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[U2Cl2O4(OH)2(H2O)4] M = 717.04 Monoclinic, a = 10.712 (2) Å b = 6.1212 (12) Å c = 17.662 (4) Å β = 95.47 (3)° V = 1152.8 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Synchrotron radiation λ = 0.77000 Å μ = 63.63 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

ESRF, SNBL, BM01A diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SCALE3 in ABSPACK; Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶) T min = 0.008, T max = 0.056 13020 measured reflections 1846 independent reflections 1620 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.067

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045 wR(F 2) = 0.131 S = 1.11 1846 reflections 127 parameters H atoms not located Δρmax = 3.37 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.67 e Å−3 Data collection: MAR345 Program Manual (Mar, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLUTON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810002394/bt5153sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810002394/bt5153Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[U2Cl2O4(OH)2(H2O)4]F(000) = 1232
Mr = 717.04Dx = 4.131 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nSynchrotron radiation, λ = 0.77000 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 4751 reflections
a = 10.712 (2) Åθ = 2.3–26.2°
b = 6.1212 (12) ŵ = 63.63 mm1
c = 17.662 (4) ÅT = 100 K
β = 95.47 (3)°Block, yellow
V = 1152.8 (4) Å30.15 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
Z = 4
ESRF, SNBL, BM01A diffractometer1846 independent reflections
Radiation source: bending magnet1620 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
double crystalRint = 0.067
φ scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SCALE3 in ABSPACK; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.008, Tmax = 0.056k = 0→7
13020 measured reflectionsl = 0→20
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.131w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0885P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.11(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1846 reflectionsΔρmax = 3.37 e Å3
127 parametersΔρmin = −1.67 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
U10.45262 (4)0.79563 (9)0.83956 (3)0.0174 (2)
U20.54899 (4)1.08385 (9)0.65373 (3)0.0172 (2)
Cl10.3096 (3)1.0768 (5)0.91681 (19)0.0219 (8)
Cl20.6957 (3)0.8008 (6)0.5776 (2)0.0228 (8)
O10.5897 (9)0.8918 (15)0.8900 (5)0.023 (2)
O20.3157 (9)0.6944 (16)0.7847 (5)0.020 (2)
O30.5411 (9)0.4358 (15)0.8468 (5)0.020 (2)
O40.3839 (10)0.5906 (16)0.9501 (6)0.029 (2)
O50.6817 (9)1.1917 (16)0.7088 (5)0.021 (2)
O60.4135 (9)0.9824 (15)0.6013 (5)0.020 (2)
O70.6135 (10)1.2896 (16)0.5424 (6)0.028 (2)
O80.4552 (9)1.4395 (16)0.6490 (5)0.021 (2)
O90.5643 (8)0.7649 (17)0.7297 (5)0.019 (2)
O100.4367 (9)1.1133 (14)0.7628 (5)0.018 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
U10.0166 (4)0.0182 (4)0.0173 (3)0.00014 (19)0.0014 (2)0.00002 (17)
U20.0173 (4)0.0174 (4)0.0169 (3)−0.00055 (19)0.0016 (2)−0.00013 (17)
Cl10.0245 (19)0.0218 (18)0.0200 (17)0.0052 (14)0.0052 (14)−0.0007 (13)
Cl20.0264 (19)0.0220 (18)0.0205 (16)0.0029 (14)0.0048 (14)−0.0024 (13)
O10.027 (6)0.019 (5)0.023 (5)0.004 (4)0.003 (4)−0.001 (4)
O20.025 (5)0.021 (6)0.014 (4)−0.007 (4)0.000 (4)−0.003 (4)
O30.021 (5)0.016 (5)0.022 (5)0.009 (4)−0.002 (4)0.002 (4)
O40.028 (6)0.026 (6)0.034 (6)0.006 (5)0.012 (5)0.003 (4)
O50.015 (5)0.026 (6)0.021 (5)−0.011 (4)0.000 (4)0.000 (4)
O60.020 (5)0.017 (5)0.023 (5)−0.002 (4)−0.006 (4)0.002 (4)
O70.031 (6)0.022 (6)0.032 (6)−0.011 (5)0.004 (5)0.004 (4)
O80.019 (5)0.022 (5)0.021 (5)0.003 (4)−0.004 (4)0.004 (4)
O90.013 (5)0.023 (5)0.019 (5)−0.008 (4)−0.007 (4)0.003 (4)
O100.023 (5)0.011 (5)0.018 (5)−0.004 (4)−0.002 (4)−0.002 (4)
U1—O11.746 (10)U2—O61.759 (9)
U1—O21.789 (10)U2—O51.772 (9)
U1—O102.367 (9)U2—O92.366 (10)
U1—O92.382 (9)U2—O102.373 (9)
U1—O32.397 (9)U2—O82.396 (10)
U1—O42.490 (10)U2—O72.488 (10)
U1—Cl12.751 (3)U2—Cl22.772 (3)
U1—U23.9492 (10)
O1—U1—O2177.7 (4)O6—U2—O990.9 (4)
O1—U1—O1091.5 (4)O5—U2—O989.3 (4)
O2—U1—O1087.9 (4)O6—U2—O1089.8 (4)
O1—U1—O988.8 (4)O5—U2—O1088.2 (4)
O2—U1—O988.9 (4)O9—U2—O1067.4 (3)
O10—U1—O967.2 (3)O6—U2—O888.9 (4)
O1—U1—O388.5 (4)O5—U2—O889.6 (4)
O2—U1—O390.6 (4)O9—U2—O8140.9 (3)
O10—U1—O3142.3 (3)O10—U2—O873.5 (3)
O9—U1—O375.2 (3)O6—U2—O792.3 (4)
O1—U1—O493.8 (4)O5—U2—O788.7 (4)
O2—U1—O487.8 (4)O9—U2—O7148.9 (3)
O10—U1—O4148.5 (3)O10—U2—O7143.5 (3)
O9—U1—O4143.9 (3)O8—U2—O770.1 (3)
O3—U1—O468.9 (3)O6—U2—Cl290.1 (3)
O1—U1—Cl191.0 (3)O5—U2—Cl292.1 (3)
O2—U1—Cl191.1 (3)O9—U2—Cl275.4 (2)
O10—U1—Cl176.0 (2)O10—U2—Cl2142.7 (2)
O9—U1—Cl1143.1 (3)O8—U2—Cl2143.8 (2)
O3—U1—Cl1141.7 (2)O7—U2—Cl273.7 (3)
O4—U1—Cl172.9 (2)O6—U2—U190.7 (3)
O1—U1—U290.0 (3)O5—U2—U188.3 (3)
O2—U1—U288.3 (3)O9—U2—U133.8 (2)
O10—U1—U233.6 (2)O10—U2—U133.5 (2)
O9—U1—U233.6 (2)O8—U2—U1107.0 (2)
O3—U1—U2108.7 (2)O7—U2—U1175.8 (2)
O4—U1—U2175.4 (3)Cl2—U2—U1109.21 (8)
Cl1—U1—U2109.56 (7)U2—O9—U1112.6 (4)
O6—U2—O5177.8 (4)U1—O10—U2112.9 (4)
  5 in total

1.  Stoichiometry and structure of uranylVI hydroxo dimer and trimer complexes in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Satoru Tsushima; André Rossberg; Atsushi Ikeda; Katharina Müller; Andreas C Scheinost
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Lanthanides and actinides in ionic liquids.

Authors:  Koen Binnemans
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Speciation of uranyl complexes in ionic liquids by optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Peter Nockemann; Kelly Servaes; Rik Van Deun; Kristof Van Hecke; Luc Van Meervelt; Koen Binnemans; Christiane Görller-Walrand
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.