Literature DB >> 21579572

1,1'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(1,4,7-triazonane).

James C Knight1, Ian A Fallis.   

Abstract

In the centrosymmetric title compound (dtne), C(14)H(32)N(6), two 1,4,7-triaza-cyclo-nonane (tacn, or 1,4,7-triazonane) moieties are linked together each at an amino position by a single ethyl-ene spacer. The mol-ecular packing is supported by pairs of inter-molecular N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which form R(2) (2)(22) ring motifs and link the mol-ecules into infinite chains running parallel to the a axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579572      PMCID: PMC2979561          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810019562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For an investigation into the coordination chemistry of dtne derivatives and similarly bridged polyaza macrocyclic frameworks, see: Schröder et al. (2000 ▶). For dinuclear metal complexes of related ligands, see: Sinnecker et al. (2004 ▶); Marlin et al. (2005 ▶). For the crystal structure of the related compound 1,4,7-triaza­cyclo­nonane (tacn), see: Battle et al. (2005 ▶). For the structures of other metal complexes of dtne, see: Li et al. (2009 ▶). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶). For the preparation of a similar compound, see: Burdinski et al. (2000 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H32N6 M = 284.46 Triclinic, a = 6.2732 (3) Å b = 6.4988 (3) Å c = 10.7152 (6) Å α = 99.751 (2)° β = 93.115 (2)° γ = 110.410 (3)° V = 400.45 (3) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.4 × 0.28 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.649, T max = 0.985 4952 measured reflections 1806 independent reflections 1599 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.099

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.068 wR(F 2) = 0.208 S = 1.23 1806 reflections 99 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810019562/sj5006sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810019562/sj5006Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H32N6Z = 1
Mr = 284.46F(000) = 158
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.18 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.2732 (3) ÅCell parameters from 6758 reflections
b = 6.4988 (3) Åθ = 1.0–27.5°
c = 10.7152 (6) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
α = 99.751 (2)°T = 150 K
β = 93.115 (2)°Block, colourless
γ = 110.410 (3)°0.4 × 0.28 × 0.28 mm
V = 400.45 (3) Å3
Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer1806 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1599 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.099
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)h = −7→8
Tmin = 0.649, Tmax = 0.985k = −8→8
4952 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.208H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.23w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0859P)2 + 0.2591P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1806 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
99 parametersΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.33 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.1344 (3)0.5390 (3)0.32247 (17)0.0229 (4)
H10.145 (5)0.533 (5)0.233 (3)0.033 (7)*
N20.6399 (3)0.5507 (3)0.29452 (16)0.0202 (4)
H20.775 (5)0.583 (4)0.312 (2)0.019 (6)*
N30.1962 (3)0.1707 (3)0.15019 (15)0.0200 (4)
C10.3489 (3)0.6779 (3)0.4061 (2)0.0231 (5)
H1A0.36710.59780.47440.028*
H1B0.33280.8190.44750.028*
C20.5687 (3)0.7378 (3)0.3420 (2)0.0234 (5)
H2A0.54680.8080.26960.028*
H2B0.69450.85130.4040.028*
C30.5883 (3)0.4564 (3)0.15762 (18)0.0234 (5)
H3A0.73450.4730.12210.028*
H3B0.51670.54610.11680.028*
C40.4308 (3)0.2106 (3)0.12080 (18)0.0225 (5)
H4A0.42670.15750.02820.027*
H4B0.49540.12110.16640.027*
C50.1748 (3)0.1640 (3)0.28616 (18)0.0211 (5)
H5A0.3290.22240.33550.025*
H5B0.09660.00720.29550.025*
C60.0377 (3)0.3056 (3)0.33779 (19)0.0230 (5)
H6A−0.12070.23660.29340.028*
H6B0.02930.30370.42960.028*
C70.0265 (4)−0.0249 (3)0.06487 (18)0.0241 (5)
H7A−0.1166−0.07410.10490.029*
H7B0.0849−0.14930.05280.029*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0170 (8)0.0243 (9)0.0240 (9)0.0054 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0006 (7)
N20.0140 (8)0.0237 (9)0.0189 (8)0.0049 (6)0.0007 (6)−0.0013 (6)
N30.0168 (8)0.0211 (8)0.0152 (8)0.0016 (6)0.0000 (6)−0.0021 (6)
C10.0182 (9)0.0242 (10)0.0229 (10)0.0068 (8)0.0025 (7)−0.0037 (8)
C20.0190 (9)0.0193 (9)0.0276 (10)0.0033 (7)0.0038 (7)0.0009 (8)
C30.0199 (9)0.0266 (10)0.0183 (9)0.0033 (8)0.0038 (7)0.0010 (8)
C40.0205 (10)0.0246 (10)0.0181 (9)0.0061 (8)0.0024 (7)−0.0028 (7)
C50.0209 (9)0.0214 (9)0.0166 (9)0.0034 (7)0.0007 (7)0.0018 (7)
C60.0174 (9)0.0243 (10)0.0226 (10)0.0028 (7)0.0043 (7)0.0016 (8)
C70.0231 (10)0.0193 (9)0.0205 (10)−0.0007 (7)−0.0025 (7)−0.0014 (8)
N1—C61.466 (3)C3—C41.526 (3)
N1—C11.475 (2)C3—H3A0.99
N1—H10.96 (3)C3—H3B0.99
N2—C21.460 (3)C4—H4A0.99
N2—C31.462 (2)C4—H4B0.99
N2—H20.80 (3)C5—C61.524 (3)
N3—C71.464 (2)C5—H5A0.99
N3—C41.464 (2)C5—H5B0.99
N3—C51.477 (2)C6—H6A0.99
C1—C21.531 (3)C6—H6B0.99
C1—H1A0.99C7—C7i1.525 (4)
C1—H1B0.99C7—H7A0.99
C2—H2A0.99C7—H7B0.99
C2—H2B0.99
C6—N1—C1114.96 (17)H3A—C3—H3B107.5
C6—N1—H1106.1 (17)N3—C4—C3113.41 (16)
C1—N1—H1114.6 (17)N3—C4—H4A108.9
C2—N2—C3117.19 (17)C3—C4—H4A108.9
C2—N2—H2111.5 (17)N3—C4—H4B108.9
C3—N2—H2106.5 (18)C3—C4—H4B108.9
C7—N3—C4112.85 (15)H4A—C4—H4B107.7
C7—N3—C5112.41 (15)N3—C5—C6109.75 (16)
C4—N3—C5112.25 (15)N3—C5—H5A109.7
N1—C1—C2116.37 (17)C6—C5—H5A109.7
N1—C1—H1A108.2N3—C5—H5B109.7
C2—C1—H1A108.2C6—C5—H5B109.7
N1—C1—H1B108.2H5A—C5—H5B108.2
C2—C1—H1B108.2N1—C6—C5113.78 (16)
H1A—C1—H1B107.3N1—C6—H6A108.8
N2—C2—C1115.49 (16)C5—C6—H6A108.8
N2—C2—H2A108.4N1—C6—H6B108.8
C1—C2—H2A108.4C5—C6—H6B108.8
N2—C2—H2B108.4H6A—C6—H6B107.7
C1—C2—H2B108.4N3—C7—C7i112.1 (2)
H2A—C2—H2B107.5N3—C7—H7A109.2
N2—C3—C4115.55 (17)C7i—C7—H7A109.2
N2—C3—H3A108.4N3—C7—H7B109.2
C4—C3—H3A108.4C7i—C7—H7B109.2
N2—C3—H3B108.4H7A—C7—H7B107.9
C4—C3—H3B108.4
C6—N1—C1—C2106.9 (2)C7—N3—C5—C6−97.75 (19)
C3—N2—C2—C1101.1 (2)C4—N3—C5—C6133.75 (17)
N1—C1—C2—N2−67.9 (2)C1—N1—C6—C5−71.3 (2)
C2—N2—C3—C4−118.6 (2)N3—C5—C6—N1−56.6 (2)
C7—N3—C4—C3151.78 (17)C4—N3—C7—C7i−77.7 (3)
C5—N3—C4—C3−79.9 (2)C5—N3—C7—C7i154.1 (2)
N2—C3—C4—N367.4 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···N1ii0.80 (3)2.37 (3)3.129 (3)159 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯N1i0.80 (3)2.37 (3)3.129 (3)159 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  Synthesis and characterization of tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-modified mono-, di-, and trinuclear manganese complexes as electron-transfer models for photosystem II.

Authors:  D Burdinski; E Bothe; K Wieghardt
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-01-10       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Magnetic interactions in dinuclear Mn(III)Mn(IV) complexes covalently tethered to organic radicals: spectroscopic models for the S(2)Y(z)(*) state of photosystem II.

Authors:  Dana S Marlin; Eckhard Bill; Thomas Weyhermüller; Eberhard Bothe; Karl Wieghardt
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy.

Authors:  R H Blessing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Calculating the electron paramagnetic resonance parameters of exchange coupled transition metal complexes using broken symmetry density functional theory: application to a MnIII/MnIV model compound.

Authors:  Sebastian Sinnecker; Frank Neese; Louis Noodleman; Wolfgang Lubitz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 15.419

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.