Literature DB >> 21579552

4-Sulfamoylanilinium chloride.

Donia Zaouali Zgolli1, Habib Boughzala, Ahmed Driss.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(6)H(9)N(2)O(2)S(+)·Cl(-), the chloride anions are sandwiched between layers of 4-sulfonamido-anilinium anions. The components interact by way of N-H⋯Cl and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, building up a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579552      PMCID: PMC2979367          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810019471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of diamines, see: Pasini & Zunino (1987 ▶); Otsuka et al. (1990 ▶); Michalson & Smuszkovicz (1989 ▶); Reedijk et al. (1996 ▶). For their use in asymmetric catalysis, see: Blaser (1992 ▶). For related structures, see: Chatterjee et al. (1981 ▶); Gelbrich et al. (2008 ▶); Gelmboldt et al. (2004 ▶); Smith et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H9N2O2S+·Cl− M = 208.66 Orthorhombic, a = 7.4608 (2) Å b = 7.7278 (2) Å c = 31.694 (2) Å V = 1827.35 (13) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.61 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.982, T max = 0.994 2906 measured reflections 1989 independent reflections 1442 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.033 2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042 wR(F 2) = 0.182 S = 1.07 1989 reflections 110 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810019471/dn2568sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810019471/dn2568Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H9N2O2S+·ClF(000) = 864
Mr = 208.66Dx = 1.517 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbnbMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2bc 2abCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 7.4608 (2) Åθ = 10–15°
b = 7.7278 (2) ŵ = 0.61 mm1
c = 31.694 (2) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1827.35 (13) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 80.3 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1442 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.033
graphiteθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Non–profiled ω/2θ scansh = −9→2
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −1→9
Tmin = 0.982, Tmax = 0.994l = −1→40
2906 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
1989 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.182H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1231P)2 + 0.2341P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1989 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
110 parametersΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.44 e Å3
Experimental. Number of psi-scan sets used was 5 Theta correction was applied. Averaged transmission function was used. No Fourier smoothing was applied (North et al., 1968).
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S1−0.01848 (14)0.91801 (12)0.80899 (3)0.0494 (3)
O10.0885 (5)1.0213 (4)0.78197 (10)0.0826 (11)
O2−0.1835 (5)0.9862 (4)0.82564 (9)0.0718 (10)
N10.4306 (4)0.7241 (3)0.95815 (9)0.0394 (6)
H1A0.48630.81850.96750.059*
H1B0.51140.64430.95120.059*
H1C0.35960.68280.97830.059*
N2−0.0703 (5)0.7452 (5)0.78407 (10)0.0623 (9)
H210.01270.70230.76940.075*
H22−0.13810.67330.79630.075*
C10.3224 (4)0.7679 (3)0.92096 (9)0.0317 (6)
C20.1373 (4)0.7587 (4)0.92407 (10)0.0402 (7)
H20.08330.72100.94890.048*
C30.0345 (4)0.8064 (5)0.88976 (10)0.0433 (7)
H3−0.08980.80260.89150.052*
C40.1162 (4)0.8597 (4)0.85296 (9)0.0368 (7)
C50.3026 (5)0.8677 (4)0.84957 (11)0.0438 (8)
H50.35630.90390.82460.053*
C60.4060 (4)0.8208 (4)0.88399 (11)0.0444 (7)
H60.53040.82460.88240.053*
Cl10.72981 (10)1.00078 (9)0.97197 (3)0.0408 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0590 (6)0.0496 (5)0.0396 (5)0.0060 (4)−0.0092 (4)0.0052 (4)
O10.097 (3)0.084 (2)0.066 (2)−0.0156 (19)−0.015 (2)0.0379 (16)
O20.0707 (18)0.084 (2)0.0607 (19)0.0399 (17)−0.0180 (16)−0.0076 (15)
N10.0340 (12)0.0321 (13)0.0521 (16)−0.0016 (10)−0.0096 (11)0.0030 (11)
N20.067 (2)0.075 (2)0.0450 (17)−0.0057 (18)−0.0046 (16)−0.0158 (15)
C10.0284 (12)0.0237 (12)0.0432 (16)0.0010 (11)−0.0005 (12)−0.0017 (11)
C20.0327 (15)0.0508 (17)0.0373 (15)−0.0017 (14)0.0024 (12)0.0058 (13)
C30.0273 (13)0.0593 (19)0.0431 (18)0.0005 (14)−0.0008 (13)0.0031 (15)
C40.0395 (16)0.0311 (14)0.0397 (17)0.0025 (12)−0.0044 (13)−0.0011 (12)
C50.0416 (17)0.0449 (18)0.0450 (19)−0.0025 (14)0.0098 (13)0.0050 (14)
C60.0306 (14)0.0488 (18)0.0536 (19)−0.0019 (14)0.0052 (14)0.0001 (15)
Cl10.0310 (4)0.0328 (5)0.0586 (6)−0.0038 (3)0.0016 (3)0.0013 (3)
S1—O11.417 (3)C1—C21.386 (4)
S1—O21.439 (4)C1—C61.389 (4)
S1—N21.599 (3)C2—C31.381 (4)
S1—C41.776 (3)C2—H20.9300
N1—C11.468 (4)C3—C41.379 (4)
N1—H1A0.8900C3—H30.9300
N1—H1B0.8900C4—C51.396 (5)
N1—H1C0.8900C5—C61.384 (5)
N2—H210.8433C5—H50.9300
N2—H220.8457C6—H60.9300
O1—S1—O2119.8 (2)C6—C1—N1119.9 (3)
O1—S1—N2107.9 (2)C3—C2—C1118.9 (3)
O2—S1—N2106.3 (2)C3—C2—H2120.5
O1—S1—C4107.35 (18)C1—C2—H2120.5
O2—S1—C4106.81 (16)C4—C3—C2120.0 (3)
N2—S1—C4108.23 (17)C4—C3—H3120.0
C1—N1—H1A109.5C2—C3—H3120.0
C1—N1—H1B109.5C3—C4—C5121.2 (3)
H1A—N1—H1B109.5C3—C4—S1119.3 (2)
C1—N1—H1C109.5C5—C4—S1119.5 (2)
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C6—C5—C4118.9 (3)
H1B—N1—H1C109.5C6—C5—H5120.5
S1—N2—H21115.1C4—C5—H5120.5
S1—N2—H22117.9C5—C6—C1119.4 (3)
H21—N2—H22115.7C5—C6—H6120.3
C2—C1—C6121.5 (3)C1—C6—H6120.3
C2—C1—N1118.6 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl10.892.303.122 (3)153
N1—H1B···Cl1i0.892.323.097 (3)146
N1—H1C···Cl1ii0.892.333.189 (3)162
N2—H21···O1iii0.842.222.963 (5)147
N2—H22···O2iv0.852.173.019 (5)178
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl10.892.303.122 (3)153
N1—H1B⋯Cl1i0.892.323.097 (3)146
N1—H1C⋯Cl1ii0.892.333.189 (3)162
N2—H21⋯O1iii0.842.222.963 (5)147
N2—H22⋯O2iv0.852.173.019 (5)178

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  3 in total

Review 1.  Medicinal agents incorporating the 1,2-diamine functionality.

Authors:  E T Michalson; J Szmuszkovicz
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1989

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Delta-sulfanilamide.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Ann L Bingham; Terence L Threlfall; Michael B Hursthouse
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.172

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  4-Sulfamoylanilinium nitrate.

Authors:  S Pandiarajan; S Balasubramanian; B Ravikumar; S Athimoolam
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-09-30

2.  Bis(4-sulfamoylanilinium) sulfate.

Authors:  B Ravikumar; S Pandiarajan; S Athimoolam
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-03-28

3.  Crystal structure of 4-sulfamoylanilinium di-hydrogen phosphate.

Authors:  C Muthuselvi; N Mala; N Srinivasan; S Pandiarajan; R V Krishnakumar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-08-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.