Literature DB >> 21579363

3-Amino-phenyl-boronic acid monohydrate.

Araceli Vega1, Maria Zarate, Hugo Tlahuext, Herbert Höpfl.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(6)H(8)BNO(2)·H(2)O, the almost planar boronic acid mol-ecules (r.m.s. deviation = 0.044 Å) form inversion dimers, linked by pairs of O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The water mol-ecules link these dimers into [100] chains by way of O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, and N-H⋯O links generate (100) sheets.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579363      PMCID: PMC2979464          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810015655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to the synthesis, structures and applications of phenyl­boronic acid derivatives, see: Barba & Betanzos (2007 ▶); Barba et al. (2004 ▶, 2006 ▶); Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶); Christinat et al. (2008 ▶); Dreos et al. (2002 ▶); Fujita et al. (2008 ▶); Höpfl (2002 ▶); Hall (2005 ▶); Lulinski et al. (2007 ▶); Miyaura & Suzuki (1995 ▶); Severin (2009 ▶); Shinkai et al. (2001 ▶); Smith et al. (2008 ▶); Zhang et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H8BNO2·H2O M = 154.96 Monoclinic, a = 7.1211 (8) Å b = 13.8548 (15) Å c = 7.8475 (8) Å β = 100.663 (2)° V = 760.88 (14) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.44 × 0.38 × 0.34 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.89, T max = 1.00 7077 measured reflections 1341 independent reflections 1258 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.088 S = 1.03 1341 reflections 124 parameters 6 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus-NT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus-NT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL-NT (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL-NT; molecular graphics: SHELXTL-NT; software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810015655/hb5409sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810015655/hb5409Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H8BNO2·H2OF(000) = 328
Mr = 154.96Dx = 1.353 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point: 368 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1211 (8) ÅCell parameters from 4929 reflections
b = 13.8548 (15) Åθ = 2.9–28.3°
c = 7.8475 (8) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 100.663 (2)°T = 100 K
V = 760.88 (14) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.44 × 0.38 × 0.34 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer1341 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1258 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.022
Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.9°
phi and ω scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)k = −16→16
Tmin = 0.89, Tmax = 1.00l = −9→9
7077 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.088H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0487P)2 + 0.3165P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1341 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
124 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
6 restraintsΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
B10.5617 (2)0.06346 (10)0.24383 (18)0.0160 (3)
N11.02034 (15)0.15487 (8)0.78329 (14)0.0186 (3)
H1A1.030 (2)0.1547 (11)0.8942 (3)0.022 (4)*
H1B1.0986 (18)0.1138 (9)0.753 (2)0.029 (4)*
O10.71516 (12)0.03223 (7)0.17614 (11)0.0180 (2)
H1'0.682 (3)0.0084 (12)0.0767 (10)0.038 (5)*
O20.38624 (12)0.05950 (6)0.13944 (11)0.0179 (2)
H2'0.2917 (15)0.0828 (12)0.175 (2)0.036 (5)*
C10.60035 (17)0.10356 (8)0.43486 (16)0.0151 (3)
C20.78720 (17)0.10598 (8)0.52950 (16)0.0158 (3)
H20.88810.08090.47860.019*
C30.82923 (17)0.14429 (8)0.69650 (16)0.0151 (3)
C40.68011 (18)0.17961 (9)0.77225 (16)0.0171 (3)
H40.70620.20510.88660.021*
C50.49436 (18)0.17741 (9)0.68042 (16)0.0181 (3)
H50.39350.20180.73220.022*
C60.45380 (17)0.13999 (9)0.51337 (16)0.0163 (3)
H60.32570.13910.45190.020*
O310.05437 (12)0.14588 (7)0.17821 (12)0.0199 (2)
H31A0.048 (3)0.2022 (5)0.217 (2)0.041 (5)*
H31B−0.0485 (14)0.1179 (12)0.186 (2)0.040 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
B10.0179 (7)0.0120 (7)0.0181 (7)−0.0012 (5)0.0037 (6)0.0013 (5)
N10.0161 (6)0.0235 (6)0.0156 (6)0.0018 (4)0.0016 (4)−0.0009 (4)
O10.0155 (5)0.0228 (5)0.0152 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0017 (3)−0.0049 (4)
O20.0143 (5)0.0221 (5)0.0172 (5)0.0019 (4)0.0026 (4)−0.0047 (4)
C10.0174 (6)0.0110 (6)0.0171 (6)−0.0019 (5)0.0034 (5)0.0016 (5)
C20.0167 (6)0.0137 (6)0.0179 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0058 (5)0.0014 (5)
C30.0164 (6)0.0126 (6)0.0158 (6)−0.0008 (5)0.0019 (5)0.0030 (5)
C40.0206 (7)0.0153 (6)0.0156 (6)−0.0012 (5)0.0038 (5)−0.0013 (5)
C50.0177 (6)0.0159 (6)0.0219 (7)0.0011 (5)0.0072 (5)−0.0007 (5)
C60.0135 (6)0.0157 (6)0.0190 (6)−0.0015 (5)0.0013 (5)0.0004 (5)
O310.0154 (5)0.0228 (5)0.0219 (5)0.0007 (4)0.0045 (4)−0.0031 (4)
B1—O21.3623 (17)C2—C31.3941 (18)
B1—O11.3707 (17)C2—H20.9500
B1—C11.5745 (18)C3—C41.3980 (18)
N1—C31.4122 (16)C4—C51.3846 (18)
N1—H1A0.860 (3)C4—H40.9500
N1—H1B0.860 (13)C5—C61.3894 (18)
O1—H1'0.840 (10)C5—H50.9500
O2—H2'0.840 (13)C6—H60.9500
C1—C21.3991 (17)O31—H31A0.842 (9)
C1—C61.4005 (18)O31—H31B0.841 (12)
O2—B1—O1117.55 (11)C2—C3—C4119.02 (11)
O2—B1—C1124.48 (11)C2—C3—N1120.86 (11)
O1—B1—C1117.95 (11)C4—C3—N1119.91 (11)
C3—N1—H1A112.3 (11)C5—C4—C3119.91 (11)
C3—N1—H1B114.4 (11)C5—C4—H4120.0
H1A—N1—H1B109.9 (15)C3—C4—H4120.0
B1—O1—H1'112.2 (13)C4—C5—C6120.73 (11)
B1—O2—H2'119.1 (12)C4—C5—H5119.6
C2—C1—C6118.08 (11)C6—C5—H5119.6
C2—C1—B1119.71 (11)C5—C6—C1120.52 (11)
C6—C1—B1122.19 (11)C5—C6—H6119.7
C3—C2—C1121.72 (11)C1—C6—H6119.7
C3—C2—H2119.1H31A—O31—H31B107.4 (18)
C1—C2—H2119.1
O2—B1—C1—C2−178.77 (11)C1—C2—C3—N1−173.67 (11)
O1—B1—C1—C2−0.23 (17)C2—C3—C4—C5−0.90 (18)
O2—B1—C1—C6−0.64 (19)N1—C3—C4—C5173.96 (11)
O1—B1—C1—C6177.90 (11)C3—C4—C5—C60.28 (18)
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.73 (18)C4—C5—C6—C10.13 (18)
B1—C1—C2—C3177.47 (11)C2—C1—C6—C50.08 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C41.14 (18)B1—C1—C6—C5−178.07 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1'···O2i0.84 (1)1.92 (1)2.7583 (13)174 (2)
N1—H1A···O31ii0.86 (1)2.21 (1)3.0661 (15)177 (1)
N1—H1B···O1iii0.86 (1)2.43 (1)3.1854 (15)147 (1)
O2—H2'···O310.84 (1)1.91 (1)2.7159 (13)161 (2)
O31—H31A···N1iv0.84 (1)2.07 (1)2.9040 (15)173 (2)
O31—H31B···O1v0.84 (1)2.05 (1)2.8810 (13)170 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1′⋯O2i0.84 (1)1.92 (1)2.7583 (13)174 (2)
N1—H1A⋯O31ii0.86 (1)2.21 (1)3.0661 (15)177 (1)
N1—H1B⋯O1iii0.86 (1)2.43 (1)3.1854 (15)147 (1)
O2—H2′⋯O310.84 (1)1.91 (1)2.7159 (13)161 (2)
O31—H31A⋯N1iv0.84 (1)2.07 (1)2.9040 (15)173 (2)
O31—H31B⋯O1v0.84 (1)2.05 (1)2.8810 (13)170 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  9 in total

Review 1.  Positive allosteric systems designed on dynamic supramolecular scaffolds: toward switching and amplification of guest affinity and selectivity.

Authors:  S Shinkai; M Ikeda; A Sugasaki; M Takeuchi
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  Boron macrocycles having a calix-like shape. Synthesis, characterization, X-ray analysis, and inclusion properties.

Authors:  Victor Barba; Raúl Villamil; Rolando Luna; Carolina Godoy-Alcantar; Herbert Höpfl; Hiram I Beltran; Luis S Zamudio-Rivera; Rosa Santillan; Norberto Farfan
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Multicomponent assembly of boronic acid based macrocycles and cages.

Authors:  Nicolas Christinat; Rosario Scopelliti; Kay Severin
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Boronic acids as building blocks for molecular nanostructures and polymeric materials.

Authors:  Kay Severin
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Boron-nitrogen macrocycles: a new generation of calix[3]arenes.

Authors:  Victor Barba; Herbert Höpfl; Norberto Farfán; Rosa Santillan; Hiram I Beltran; Luis S Zamudio-Rivera
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Boronic acids in molecular self-assembly.

Authors:  Norifumi Fujita; Seiji Shinkai; Tony D James
Journal:  Chem Asian J       Date:  2008-07-07

8.  A unique quinolineboronic acid-based supramolecular structure that relies on double intermolecular B-N bonds for self-assembly in solid state and in solution.

Authors:  Yanling Zhang; Minyong Li; Sekar Chandrasekaran; Xingming Gao; Xikui Fang; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Kenneth Hardcastle; Jenny Yang; Binghe Wang
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 2.457

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.