Literature DB >> 21579313

catena-Poly[[bis-(ethyl-enediamine)copper(II)]-μ-sulfato].

Martin Lutz1, Stef Smeets, Pascal Parois.   

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cu(SO(4))(C(2)H(8)N(2))(2)](n), the Cu, S and two O atoms lie on a mirror plane. The Cu atom is in a distorted octa-hedral environment and the ethyl-enediamine ligand is in a gauche conformation. The sulfate dianion is bridging, forming a one-dimensional chain. A two-dimensional net parallel to (001) is generated by N-H⋯O hydrogen bonding between the chains.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579313      PMCID: PMC2979599          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681001737X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related Cu(II) ethyl­enediamine complexes, see: Cullen & Lingafelter (1970 ▶); Bertini et al. (1979 ▶); Healy et al. (1978 ▶); Manriquez et al. (1996 ▶); Taylor et al. (2006 ▶). A similar variation of axial Cu—O distances is found in many weakly coord­inating anions such as sulfate (Castro et al., 2002 ▶), nitrate (Plater et al., 2008 ▶), perchlorate (Bernhardt et al., 2001 ▶) or triflate (Liu et al., 2007 ▶). The anisotropic mosaicity was treated according to Duisenberg (1983 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu(SO4)(C2H8N2)2] M = 279.81 Orthorhombic, a = 14.4959 (3) Å b = 9.63748 (8) Å c = 13.87746 (17) Å V = 1938.73 (5) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.47 mm−1 T = 110 K 0.36 × 0.21 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer Absorption correction: analytical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a ▶) T min = 0.489, T max = 0.910 29167 measured reflections 2204 independent reflections 1990 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.032

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.019 wR(F 2) = 0.048 S = 1.10 2204 reflections 86 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.44 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.56 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999 ▶); cell refinement: PEAKREF (Schreurs, 2005 ▶); data reduction: Eval15 (Schreurs et al., 2010 ▶) and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2008a ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681001737X/vm2026sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681001737X/vm2026Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu(SO4)(C2H8N2)2]F(000) = 1160
Mr = 279.81Dx = 1.917 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, CmcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2bc 2Cell parameters from 21936 reflections
a = 14.4959 (3) Åθ = 2.5–35.0°
b = 9.63748 (8) ŵ = 2.47 mm1
c = 13.87746 (17) ÅT = 110 K
V = 1938.73 (5) Å3Plate, blue
Z = 80.36 × 0.21 × 0.06 mm
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer2204 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode1990 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.032
φ and ω scansθmax = 35.0°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: analytical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a)h = −23→23
Tmin = 0.489, Tmax = 0.910k = −15→15
29167 measured reflectionsl = −20→22
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.048H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0208P)2 + 2.1845P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2204 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
86 parametersΔρmax = 0.44 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.56 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.00000.226359 (15)0.385553 (11)0.00587 (4)
S10.00000.24252 (3)0.13888 (2)0.00541 (5)
O10.00000.32265 (9)0.22939 (6)0.00932 (16)
O20.08343 (5)0.15354 (7)0.13383 (5)0.01049 (12)
O30.00000.34145 (9)0.05699 (7)0.00990 (16)
N10.09978 (5)0.08890 (8)0.35157 (6)0.00890 (13)
H1N0.0983 (10)0.0830 (15)0.2899 (12)0.018 (4)*
H2N0.0882 (13)0.0121 (18)0.3774 (10)0.022 (4)*
N20.10526 (6)0.35659 (8)0.41674 (6)0.00842 (12)
H3N0.0944 (12)0.4387 (18)0.3986 (11)0.020 (4)*
H4N0.1142 (11)0.3552 (15)0.4779 (11)0.016 (4)*
C10.18950 (6)0.14531 (9)0.38195 (7)0.01121 (15)
H1A0.23970.10340.34340.013*
H1B0.20070.12410.45080.013*
C20.18704 (7)0.30147 (9)0.36647 (7)0.01045 (15)
H2A0.24380.34450.39260.013*
H2B0.18330.32270.29680.013*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.00700 (7)0.00409 (6)0.00652 (7)0.0000.000−0.00089 (4)
S10.00864 (12)0.00388 (10)0.00371 (11)0.0000.000−0.00008 (8)
O10.0172 (4)0.0071 (4)0.0036 (4)0.0000.000−0.0017 (3)
O20.0111 (3)0.0101 (3)0.0102 (3)0.0040 (2)0.0003 (2)−0.0006 (2)
O30.0192 (4)0.0057 (3)0.0048 (4)0.0000.0000.0012 (3)
N10.0094 (3)0.0064 (3)0.0109 (3)−0.0003 (2)−0.0013 (3)−0.0010 (2)
N20.0126 (3)0.0064 (3)0.0063 (3)−0.0012 (2)0.0005 (2)−0.0004 (2)
C10.0091 (4)0.0088 (3)0.0157 (4)0.0001 (3)−0.0027 (3)−0.0002 (3)
C20.0103 (4)0.0094 (3)0.0116 (4)−0.0024 (3)0.0012 (3)−0.0003 (3)
Cu1—N1i2.0172 (8)N1—H1N0.858 (16)
Cu1—N12.0173 (8)N1—H2N0.839 (17)
Cu1—N2i2.0226 (8)N2—C21.4745 (12)
Cu1—N22.0226 (8)N2—H3N0.845 (17)
Cu1—O12.3575 (9)N2—H4N0.859 (15)
Cu1—O3ii2.4673 (9)C1—C21.5207 (13)
S1—O11.4745 (9)C1—H1A0.9900
S1—O31.4834 (9)C1—H1B0.9900
S1—O2i1.4842 (7)C2—H2A0.9900
S1—O21.4842 (7)C2—H2B0.9900
N1—C11.4712 (12)
N1i—Cu1—N191.62 (4)C1—N1—H1N109.4 (10)
N1i—Cu1—N2i85.22 (3)Cu1—N1—H1N105.0 (10)
N1—Cu1—N2i176.81 (3)C1—N1—H2N112.3 (12)
N1i—Cu1—N2176.81 (3)Cu1—N1—H2N109.6 (12)
N1—Cu1—N285.22 (3)H1N—N1—H2N111.3 (14)
N2i—Cu1—N297.95 (4)C2—N2—Cu1106.36 (5)
N1i—Cu1—O192.50 (3)C2—N2—H3N110.2 (11)
N1—Cu1—O192.50 (3)Cu1—N2—H3N112.1 (11)
N2i—Cu1—O187.27 (3)C2—N2—H4N110.0 (10)
N2—Cu1—O187.27 (3)Cu1—N2—H4N108.4 (10)
N1i—Cu1—O3ii92.95 (3)H3N—N2—H4N109.7 (14)
N1—Cu1—O3ii92.95 (3)N1—C1—C2107.73 (7)
N2i—Cu1—O3ii87.59 (3)N1—C1—H1A110.2
N2—Cu1—O3ii87.59 (3)C2—C1—H1A110.2
O1—Cu1—O3ii172.18 (3)N1—C1—H1B110.2
O1—S1—O3108.42 (5)C2—C1—H1B110.2
O1—S1—O2i110.05 (3)H1A—C1—H1B108.5
O3—S1—O2i109.58 (3)N2—C2—C1107.97 (7)
O1—S1—O2110.05 (3)N2—C2—H2A110.1
O3—S1—O2109.59 (3)C1—C2—H2A110.1
O2i—S1—O2109.14 (6)N2—C2—H2B110.1
S1—O1—Cu1125.23 (5)C1—C2—H2B110.1
C1—N1—Cu1108.92 (5)H2A—C2—H2B108.4
O3—S1—O1—Cu1180.0N2—Cu1—N1—C19.25 (6)
O2i—S1—O1—Cu160.16 (3)O1—Cu1—N1—C196.30 (6)
O2—S1—O1—Cu1−60.16 (3)N1—Cu1—N2—C219.71 (6)
N1i—Cu1—O1—S1−45.86 (2)N2i—Cu1—N2—C2−159.89 (4)
N1—Cu1—O1—S145.86 (2)O1—Cu1—N2—C2−73.03 (6)
N2i—Cu1—O1—S1−130.95 (2)Cu1—N1—C1—C2−35.63 (9)
N2—Cu1—O1—S1130.95 (2)Cu1—N2—C2—C1−44.31 (8)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C1−171.12 (4)N1—C1—C2—N253.74 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O20.858 (16)2.280 (16)3.0944 (11)158.5 (14)
N1—H2N···O3iii0.839 (17)2.274 (17)3.0642 (11)157.1 (17)
N2—H3N···O2iv0.845 (17)2.125 (17)2.9636 (10)171.6 (16)
N2—H4N···O2v0.859 (15)2.210 (15)3.0308 (10)159.7 (14)
Cu1—N12.0173 (8)
Cu1—N22.0226 (8)
Cu1—O12.3575 (9)
Cu1—O3i2.4673 (9)
N1ii—Cu1—N191.62 (4)
N1—Cu1—N2ii176.81 (3)
N1—Cu1—N285.22 (3)
N2ii—Cu1—N297.95 (4)
N1—Cu1—O192.50 (3)
N2—Cu1—O187.27 (3)
N1—Cu1—O3i92.95 (3)
N2—Cu1—O3i87.59 (3)
O1—Cu1—O3i172.18 (3)
N1—C1—C2—N253.74 (10)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯O20.858 (16)2.280 (16)3.0944 (11)158.5 (14)
N1—H2N⋯O3iii0.839 (17)2.274 (17)3.0642 (11)157.1 (17)
N2—H3N⋯O2iv0.845 (17)2.125 (17)2.9636 (10)171.6 (16)
N2—H4N⋯O2v0.859 (15)2.210 (15)3.0308 (10)159.7 (14)

Symmetry codes: (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  6 in total

1.  catena-Poly[[[tetrakis(1-methylimidazole-kappaN3)copper(II)]-mu2-sulfato-kappa2O:O'] acetonitrile hemisolvate sesquihydrate].

Authors:  Jesús Castro; Paulo Pérez Lourido; Antonio Sousa-Pedrares; Elena Labisbal; Maximiliano Carabel; José Arturo García-Vázquez
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  Assembly of trigonal and tetragonal prismatic cages from octahedral metal ions and a flexible molecular clip.

Authors:  Zhi-Min Liu; Yu Liu; Sheng-Run Zheng; Zhi-Quan Yu; Mei Pan; Cheng-Yong Su
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Photoinduced electron transfer and electronic energy transfer in naphthyl-appended cyclams.

Authors:  P V Bernhardt; E G Moore; M J Riley
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-11-05       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Modelling the impact of geometric parameters on the redox potential of blue copper proteins.

Authors:  Michelle K Taylor; Davina E Stevenson; Leonard E A Berlouis; Alan R Kennedy; John Reglinski
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.155

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.