Literature DB >> 21579303

Poly[1,4-bis-(ammonio-meth-yl)cyclo-hexane [di-μ-bromido-dibromido-plumbate(II)]].

Matthew Kyle Rayner1, David Gordon Billing.   

Abstract

The title compound, {(C(8)H(20)N(2))[PbBr(4)]}(n), crystallizes as an inorganic-organic hybrid with alternating layers of diammonium cations and two-dimensional corner-sharing PbBr(6) octa-hedra extending parallel to the bc plane, which are eclipsed relative to one another. Both PbBr(6) octa-hedra and the organic cation exhibit symmetry. The cations inter-act via N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonding in the right-angled halogen sub-type of the terminal halide hydrogen-bonding motif.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579303      PMCID: PMC2979491          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For hydrogen-bonding nomenclature for inorganic–organic hybrids, see: Mitzi (1999 ▶). Hybrid structures containing diammonium cations have been synthesized by Dobrzycki & Woźniak (2008 ▶) and Zhu et al. (2003 ▶). The semiconducting properties of similar hybrids were demonstrated by Mitzi (2004 ▶). For the related chloridoplumbate(II), see: Rayner & Billing (2010a ▶) and for the isotypic iodidoplumbate(II), see: Rayner & Billing (2010b ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C8H20N2)[PbBr4] M = 671.09 Monoclinic, a = 12.1042 (6) Å b = 8.1955 (4) Å c = 8.2160 (4) Å β = 95.693 (1)° V = 811.01 (7) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 20.23 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.20 × 0.14 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: integration (XPREP; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.091, T max = 0.656 10495 measured reflections 1966 independent reflections 1742 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.063

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.021 wR(F 2) = 0.047 S = 0.81 1966 reflections 70 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.78 e Å−3 Δρmin = −2.31 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016806/wm2338sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016806/wm2338Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C8H20N2)[PbBr4]F(000) = 608
Mr = 671.09Dx = 2.748 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 5293 reflections
a = 12.1042 (6) Åθ = 3.0–28.2°
b = 8.1955 (4) ŵ = 20.23 mm1
c = 8.2160 (4) ÅT = 173 K
β = 95.693 (1)°Plate, colourless
V = 811.01 (7) Å30.20 × 0.14 × 0.02 mm
Z = 2
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1966 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1742 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.063
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: integration (XPREP; Bruker, 2005)h = −15→15
Tmin = 0.091, Tmax = 0.656k = −10→10
10495 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.047H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.81w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0349P)2 + 0.0549P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1966 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.011
70 parametersΔρmax = 0.78 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −2.31 e Å3
Experimental. Numerical intergration absorption corrections based on indexed crystal faces were applied using the XPREP routine (Bruker, 2005)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2360 (3)−0.0472 (4)0.4803 (5)0.0262 (8)
H1A0.2798−0.07110.58580.031*
H1B0.2282−0.14980.41660.031*
C20.1224 (3)0.0131 (4)0.5124 (4)0.0216 (8)
H20.13250.10950.58710.026*
C30.0636 (3)−0.1206 (4)0.6011 (4)0.0257 (8)
H3A0.0558−0.21920.53120.031*
H3B0.1093−0.14990.70350.031*
C40.0501 (3)0.0661 (5)0.3589 (4)0.0247 (7)
H4A0.08690.15690.30580.030*
H4B0.0419−0.02610.28070.030*
N10.2966 (2)0.0758 (4)0.3879 (4)0.0230 (6)
H1C0.36440.03560.37000.035*
H1D0.30540.16950.44730.035*
H1E0.25690.09720.29040.035*
Br10.25157 (3)0.02969 (4)−0.01928 (4)0.02426 (9)
Br20.50023 (3)0.18890 (4)−0.31018 (4)0.02370 (9)
Pb10.50000.00000.00000.01590 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.024 (2)0.0232 (17)0.0322 (19)0.0000 (15)0.0076 (16)0.0042 (14)
C20.024 (2)0.0206 (17)0.0210 (17)−0.0015 (13)0.0039 (15)−0.0010 (12)
C30.0206 (19)0.0285 (18)0.0277 (18)0.0035 (15)0.0011 (15)0.0101 (14)
C40.0213 (19)0.0285 (18)0.0246 (17)−0.0011 (15)0.0040 (14)0.0042 (14)
N10.0203 (16)0.0229 (15)0.0267 (15)−0.0014 (12)0.0065 (12)−0.0019 (12)
Br10.0241 (2)0.02380 (17)0.02478 (17)−0.00282 (13)0.00175 (14)−0.00035 (12)
Br20.0311 (2)0.02090 (17)0.01975 (16)0.00481 (13)0.00579 (13)0.00695 (12)
Pb10.02093 (10)0.01395 (9)0.01320 (9)0.00121 (6)0.00358 (6)0.00007 (5)
C1—N11.497 (4)C4—H4B0.9900
C1—C21.509 (5)N1—H1C0.9100
C1—H1A0.9900N1—H1D0.9100
C1—H1B0.9900N1—H1E0.9100
C2—C31.531 (4)Br1—Pb13.0054 (4)
C2—C41.526 (5)Br2—Pb12.9821 (3)
C2—H21.0000Br2—Pb1ii2.9886 (3)
C3—C4i1.514 (5)Pb1—Br2iii2.9821 (3)
C3—H3A0.9900Pb1—Br2iv2.9886 (3)
C3—H3B0.9900Pb1—Br2v2.9886 (3)
C4—C3i1.514 (5)Pb1—Br1iii3.0054 (4)
C4—H4A0.9900
N1—C1—C2111.7 (3)H4A—C4—H4B108.0
N1—C1—H1A109.3C1—N1—H1C109.5
C2—C1—H1A109.3C1—N1—H1D109.5
N1—C1—H1B109.3H1C—N1—H1D109.5
C2—C1—H1B109.3C1—N1—H1E109.5
H1A—C1—H1B108.0H1C—N1—H1E109.5
C1—C2—C3108.9 (3)H1D—N1—H1E109.5
C1—C2—C4114.0 (3)Pb1—Br2—Pb1ii152.724 (12)
C3—C2—C4110.0 (3)Br2iii—Pb1—Br2180.000 (11)
C1—C2—H2107.9Br2iii—Pb1—Br2iv89.827 (4)
C3—C2—H2107.9Br2—Pb1—Br2iv90.173 (4)
C4—C2—H2107.9Br2iii—Pb1—Br2v90.173 (4)
C4i—C3—C2111.6 (3)Br2—Pb1—Br2v89.827 (4)
C4i—C3—H3A109.3Br2iv—Pb1—Br2v180.000 (15)
C2—C3—H3A109.3Br2iii—Pb1—Br190.075 (10)
C4i—C3—H3B109.3Br2—Pb1—Br189.925 (10)
C2—C3—H3B109.3Br2iv—Pb1—Br184.697 (10)
H3A—C3—H3B108.0Br2v—Pb1—Br195.303 (10)
C3i—C4—C2111.3 (3)Br2iii—Pb1—Br1iii89.925 (10)
C3i—C4—H4A109.4Br2—Pb1—Br1iii90.075 (10)
C2—C4—H4A109.4Br2iv—Pb1—Br1iii95.303 (10)
C3i—C4—H4B109.4Br2v—Pb1—Br1iii84.697 (10)
C2—C4—H4B109.4Br1—Pb1—Br1iii180.000 (13)
N1—C1—C2—C3177.9 (3)C3—C2—C4—C3i55.8 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C454.7 (4)Pb1ii—Br2—Pb1—Br2iv−0.28 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4i178.5 (3)Pb1ii—Br2—Pb1—Br2v179.72 (4)
C4—C2—C3—C4i−56.0 (4)Pb1ii—Br2—Pb1—Br184.42 (3)
C1—C2—C4—C3i178.4 (3)Pb1ii—Br2—Pb1—Br1iii−95.58 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1C···Br2iii0.912.543.387 (3)154
N1—H1D···Br1iv0.912.573.378 (3)148
N1—H1D···Br2vi0.912.943.446 (3)117
N1—H1E···Br10.912.603.357 (3)141
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Pb1—Br2i2.9821 (3)
Pb1—Br2ii2.9886 (3)
Pb1—Br1i3.0054 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1C⋯Br2i0.912.543.387 (3)154
N1—H1D⋯Br1ii0.912.573.378 (3)148
N1—H1D⋯Br2iii0.912.943.446 (3)117
N1—H1E⋯Br10.912.603.357 (3)141

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Poly[1,4-bis-(ammonio-meth-yl)cyclo-hexane [di-μ-chlorido-dichloridoplumbate(II)]].

Authors:  Matthew Kyle Rayner; David Gordon Billing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-05-15

3.  Effect of mono- versus di-ammonium cation of 2,2'-bithiophene derivatives on the structure of organic-inorganic hybrid materials based on iodo metallates.

Authors:  Xu-Hui Zhu; Nicolas Mercier; Pierre Frère; Philippe Blanchard; Jean Roncali; Magali Allain; Claude Pasquier; Amédée Riou
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-08-25       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Poly[1,4-bis-(ammonio-meth-yl)cyclo-hexane [di-μ-iodido-diiodido-plumbate(II)]].

Authors:  Matthew Kyle Rayner; David Gordon Billing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-05-15

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Poly[1,4-bis-(ammonio-meth-yl)cyclo-hexane [di-μ-chlorido-dichloridoplumbate(II)]].

Authors:  Matthew Kyle Rayner; David Gordon Billing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 2.  Structural chemistry of layered lead halide perovskites containing single octahedral layers.

Authors:  Jason A McNulty; Philip Lightfoot
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.769

3.  Poly[1,4-bis-(ammonio-meth-yl)cyclo-hexane [di-μ-iodido-diiodido-plumbate(II)]].

Authors:  Matthew Kyle Rayner; David Gordon Billing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-05-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.