Literature DB >> 21579301

Bis(4-fluoro-anilinium) tetra-chloridocuprate(II).

Min Min Zhao1, Ping Ping Shi.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, (C(6)H(7)FN)(2)[CuCl(4)], consists of parallel two-dimensional perovskite-type layers of corner-sharing CuCl(6) octa-hedra. These are bonded together via N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds from the 4-fluoro-anilinium chains, which are almost perpendicular to the layers. The CuCl(4) dianions have two short Cu-Cl bonds [2.2657 (15) and 2.2884 (13) Å] and two longer bonds [2.8868 (15) Å], giving highly Jahn-Teller-distorted CuCl(6) octa-hedra. The Cu atoms are situated on crystallographic centers of inversion.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579301      PMCID: PMC2979418          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810017289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For similar ammonium salts, see: Yuan et al. (2004 ▶); Bhattacharya et al. (2004 ▶). For the ferroelectric properties of a related ammonium metal(II) salt, see: Zhang et al. (2009 ▶); Ye et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C6H7FN)2[CuCl4] M = 429.59 Monoclinic, a = 15.603 (3) Å b = 7.3893 (15) Å c = 7.1238 (14) Å β = 99.92 (3)° V = 809.0 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.02 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.667, T max = 0.674 8010 measured reflections 1863 independent reflections 1555 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.050

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.058 wR(F 2) = 0.166 S = 1.16 1863 reflections 98 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.03 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.88 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PRPKAPPA (Ferguson, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810017289/im2199sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810017289/im2199Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C6H7FN)2[CuCl4]F(000) = 430
Mr = 429.59Dx = 1.763 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 7279 reflections
a = 15.603 (3) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 7.3893 (15) ŵ = 2.02 mm1
c = 7.1238 (14) ÅT = 293 K
β = 99.92 (3)°Prism, green
V = 809.0 (3) Å30.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer1863 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1555 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.050
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
CCD_Profile_fitting scansh = −20→20
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.667, Tmax = 0.674l = −9→9
8010 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.058Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.166H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.16w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.059P)2 + 3.9072P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1863 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
98 parametersΔρmax = 1.02 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.88 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.1209 (5)0.6057 (12)0.4232 (12)0.0590 (19)
H10.08310.67810.47810.071*
C20.0896 (5)0.4848 (12)0.2821 (12)0.061 (2)
C30.1426 (5)0.3721 (12)0.2064 (12)0.066 (2)
H30.11950.28600.11660.079*
C40.2304 (4)0.3856 (10)0.2627 (10)0.0487 (16)
H40.26770.31250.20760.058*
C50.2632 (4)0.5085 (8)0.4019 (8)0.0333 (12)
C60.2098 (4)0.6174 (10)0.4819 (10)0.0486 (16)
H60.23280.69980.57590.058*
N10.3577 (3)0.5283 (7)0.4557 (8)0.0392 (12)
H1A0.37280.64150.43370.059*
H1B0.38410.45240.38720.059*
H1C0.37350.50320.57900.059*
F10.0021 (3)0.4721 (10)0.2268 (10)0.100 (2)
Cu10.50000.50000.00000.0265 (3)
Cl20.47957 (10)0.28942 (18)0.22368 (19)0.0370 (4)
Cl30.64585 (9)0.4598 (2)0.0752 (2)0.0403 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.042 (4)0.066 (5)0.071 (5)0.009 (3)0.015 (4)−0.003 (4)
C20.033 (3)0.087 (6)0.058 (5)−0.012 (4)−0.003 (3)0.009 (4)
C30.055 (5)0.074 (6)0.067 (5)−0.018 (4)0.003 (4)−0.024 (4)
C40.044 (4)0.049 (4)0.053 (4)−0.008 (3)0.010 (3)−0.015 (3)
C50.034 (3)0.034 (3)0.029 (3)0.003 (2)−0.001 (2)0.003 (2)
C60.045 (4)0.046 (4)0.054 (4)−0.001 (3)0.006 (3)−0.006 (3)
N10.043 (3)0.033 (3)0.041 (3)−0.001 (2)0.008 (2)0.003 (2)
F10.037 (3)0.143 (6)0.114 (5)−0.019 (3)−0.007 (3)−0.020 (4)
Cu10.0304 (5)0.0262 (5)0.0233 (5)0.0012 (4)0.0060 (3)0.0062 (3)
Cl20.0525 (9)0.0308 (7)0.0289 (7)−0.0017 (6)0.0101 (6)0.0064 (5)
Cl30.0301 (7)0.0449 (8)0.0455 (8)0.0038 (6)0.0050 (6)0.0011 (6)
C1—C21.370 (12)C5—N11.465 (8)
C1—C61.381 (10)C6—H60.9300
C1—H10.9300N1—H1A0.8900
C2—C31.350 (12)N1—H1B0.8900
C2—F11.359 (9)N1—H1C0.8900
C3—C41.362 (10)Cu1—Cl32.2657 (15)
C3—H30.9300Cu1—Cl3i2.2657 (15)
C4—C51.376 (8)Cu1—Cl22.2884 (13)
C4—H40.9300Cu1—Cl2i2.2884 (13)
C5—C61.353 (9)
C2—C1—C6118.3 (7)C5—C6—C1119.7 (7)
C2—C1—H1120.8C5—C6—H6120.2
C6—C1—H1120.8C1—C6—H6120.2
C3—C2—F1119.7 (8)C5—N1—H1A109.5
C3—C2—C1122.0 (7)C5—N1—H1B109.5
F1—C2—C1118.1 (8)H1A—N1—H1B109.5
C2—C3—C4119.4 (7)C5—N1—H1C109.5
C2—C3—H3120.3H1A—N1—H1C109.5
C4—C3—H3120.3H1B—N1—H1C109.5
C3—C4—C5119.4 (7)Cl3—Cu1—Cl3i180.00 (2)
C3—C4—H4120.3Cl3—Cu1—Cl290.06 (6)
C5—C4—H4120.3Cl3i—Cu1—Cl289.94 (6)
C6—C5—C4121.1 (6)Cl3—Cu1—Cl2i89.94 (6)
C6—C5—N1119.7 (5)Cl3i—Cu1—Cl2i90.06 (6)
C4—C5—N1119.2 (6)Cl2—Cu1—Cl2i180.00 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1B···Cl20.892.373.248 (6)168
N1—H1A···Cl3ii0.892.373.196 (5)154
N1—H1C···Cl3iii0.892.553.353 (6)151
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1B⋯Cl20.892.373.248 (6)168
N1—H1A⋯Cl3i0.892.373.196 (5)154
N1—H1C⋯Cl3ii0.892.553.353 (6)151

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Hydrogen-bonded ferroelectrics based on metal-organic coordination.

Authors:  Heng-Yun Ye; Da-Wei Fu; Yi Zhang; Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  New ferroelectrics based on divalent metal ion alum.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Li-Zhuang Chen; Ren-Gen Xiong; Takayoshi Nakamura; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.