Literature DB >> 21579115

2-Hydroxy-amino-2-oxoacetohydrazide.

Oleksandra S Trofymchuk, Svetlana V Pavlova, Vladimir Bon, Alexander N Boyko, Vasily Pekhnyo.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(2)H(5)N(3)O(3), the hydroxamic group adopts an anti orientation with respect to the hydrazide group. In the crystal, mol-ecules are connected by N-H⋯O and O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds into zigzag chains along the c axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579115      PMCID: PMC2979297          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810012341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For hydroxamic acids in biological chemistry, see: Kaczka et al. (1962 ▶); Komatsu et al. (2001 ▶). For the use of hydroxamic acids as strong chelating agents, see: Dobosz et al. (1999 ▶); Świątek-Kozłowska et al. (2000 ▶). For hydroxamic acids as the basis for the synthesis of metallacrowns compounds, see: Bodwin et al. (2001 ▶); Gumienna-Kontecka et al. (2007 ▶). For related structures, see: Sliva et al. (1997a ▶,b ▶); Mokhir et al. (2002 ▶); Fritsky et al. (2006 ▶); Moroz et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C2H5N3O3 M = 119.09 Monoclinic, a = 9.3968 (7) Å b = 3.6728 (2) Å c = 12.7510 (8) Å β = 95.598 (5)° V = 437.97 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.17 mm−1 T = 77 K 0.12 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.980, T max = 0.988 1149 measured reflections 445 independent reflections 404 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.077 S = 1.06 445 reflections 74 parameters 3 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810012341/jh2142sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810012341/jh2142Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C2H5N3O3F(000) = 248
Mr = 119.09Dx = 1.806 Mg m3
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: C -2ycCell parameters from 1149 reflections
a = 9.3968 (7) Åθ = 3.2–26.5°
b = 3.6728 (2) ŵ = 0.17 mm1
c = 12.7510 (8) ÅT = 77 K
β = 95.598 (5)°Block, colourless
V = 437.97 (5) Å30.12 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII diffractometer445 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube404 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
horizontally mounted graphite crystalRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.5°, θmin = 3.2°
φ scans and ω scans with κ offseth = −10→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008)k = −4→4
Tmin = 0.980, Tmax = 0.988l = −15→15
1149 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.077H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0363P)2 + 0.3945P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
445 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
74 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.4570 (5)0.6710 (10)0.8492 (3)0.0187 (10)
C20.4385 (4)0.8528 (9)0.7408 (3)0.0149 (9)
N10.3439 (4)0.7171 (8)0.9018 (3)0.0185 (8)
H1N10.26950.83960.87320.022*
N20.5546 (4)0.8238 (9)0.6907 (3)0.0199 (8)
H1N20.62950.70360.71940.024*
N30.5578 (4)0.9881 (9)0.5899 (3)0.0215 (9)
H1N30.64791.06960.58800.032*
H2N30.55340.81130.53710.032*
O10.3428 (3)0.5725 (8)1.0016 (2)0.0249 (8)
H1O10.41390.69691.04560.037*
O20.5674 (3)0.5033 (7)0.8820 (2)0.0236 (8)
O30.3288 (3)1.0094 (7)0.7077 (2)0.0248 (9)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.016 (3)0.0199 (18)0.020 (2)0.0004 (15)0.0007 (17)−0.0040 (15)
C20.016 (2)0.0162 (16)0.013 (2)0.0003 (14)0.0037 (17)−0.0026 (14)
N10.0142 (17)0.0252 (17)0.0162 (19)0.0030 (13)0.0019 (14)0.0015 (14)
N20.0194 (19)0.0256 (16)0.015 (2)0.0059 (14)0.0050 (14)0.0019 (14)
N30.020 (2)0.0287 (16)0.017 (2)0.0034 (13)0.0093 (15)0.0020 (14)
O10.0266 (19)0.0337 (15)0.0150 (17)−0.0005 (13)0.0048 (13)0.0048 (14)
O20.018 (2)0.0294 (17)0.024 (2)0.0081 (12)0.0057 (16)0.0060 (12)
O30.020 (2)0.0373 (18)0.0173 (19)0.0095 (12)0.0025 (16)0.0031 (12)
C1—O21.243 (6)N1—H1N10.8800
C1—N11.322 (4)N2—N31.422 (6)
C1—C21.530 (4)N2—H1N20.8800
C2—O31.220 (5)N3—H1N30.9009
C2—N21.321 (4)N3—H2N30.9332
N1—O11.380 (5)O1—H1O10.9468
O2—C1—N1125.4 (4)O1—N1—H1N1120.1
O2—C1—C2122.5 (3)C2—N2—N3119.6 (4)
N1—C1—C2112.1 (3)C2—N2—H1N2120.2
O3—C2—N2125.5 (4)N3—N2—H1N2120.2
O3—C2—C1122.4 (3)N2—N3—H1N3105.5
N2—C2—C1112.1 (3)N2—N3—H2N3110.6
C1—N1—O1119.8 (4)H1N3—N3—H2N3100.8
C1—N1—H1N1120.1N1—O1—H1O1107.0
O2—C1—C2—O3178.1 (5)O2—C1—N1—O10.0 (6)
N1—C1—C2—O3−2.3 (4)C2—C1—N1—O1−179.6 (3)
O2—C1—C2—N2−3.1 (4)O3—C2—N2—N30.8 (6)
N1—C1—C2—N2176.5 (4)C1—C2—N2—N3−178.0 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H1N2···O3i0.882.022.813 (5)149
O1—H1O1···N3ii0.951.832.740 (4)161
O1—H1O1···N3ii0.951.832.740 (4)161
N3—H1N3···O1iii0.902.293.013 (3)137
N3—H2N3···O1iv0.932.443.024 (4)121
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H1N2⋯O3i0.882.022.813 (5)149
O1—H1O1⋯N3ii0.951.832.740 (4)161
O1—H1O1⋯N3ii0.951.832.740 (4)161
N3—H1N3⋯O1iii0.902.293.013 (3)137
N3—H2N3⋯O1iv0.932.443.024 (4)121

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  5 in total

1.  Hadacidin, a new growth-inhibitory substance in human tumor systems.

Authors:  E A KACZKA; C O GITTERMAN; E L DULANEY; K FOLKERS
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Efficient stabilization of copper(III) in tetraaza pseudo-macrocyclic oxime-and-hydrazide ligands with adjustable cavity size.

Authors:  Igor O Fritsky; Henryk Kozłowski; Olga M Kanderal; Matti Haukka; Jolanta Swiatek-Kozłowska; Elzbieta Gumienna-Kontecka; Franc Meyer
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Cyclic hydroxamic-acid-containing peptide 31, a potent synthetic histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity.

Authors:  Y Komatsu; K Y Tomizaki; M Tsukamoto; T Kato; N Nishino; S Sato; T Yamori; T Tsuruo; R Furumai; M Yoshida; S Horinouchi; H Hayashi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Synthesis and structure of [2 x 2] molecular grid copper(II) and nickel(II) complexes with a new polydentate oxime-containing Schiff base ligand.

Authors:  Yurii S Moroz; Kinga Kulon; Matti Haukka; Elzbieta Gumienna-Kontecka; Henryk Kozłowski; Franc Meyer; Igor O Fritsky
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 5.165

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.