Literature DB >> 21578967

5,5'-Di-4-pyridyl-2,2'-(p-phenyl-ene)di-1,3,4-oxadiazole.

Rui-Sha Zhou1, Jiang-Feng Song.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(20)H(12)N(6)O(2), the mol-ecules are located on centres of inversion. The complete mol-ecule is almost planar, with a maximum deviation from the mean plane of 0.0657 (1) Å for the O atom. In the crystal, mol-ecules are stacked into columns elongated in the a axis direction. The centroid-centroid distances between the aromatic rings of the mol-ecules within the columns are 3.6406 (1) and 3.6287 (2) Å. Mol-ecules are additionally connected via weak inter-molecular C-H⋯N hydrogen bonding.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578967      PMCID: PMC2971886          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809050557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the potential uses of oxadiazo­les, see: Bentiss et al. (2000 ▶); Navidpour et al. (2006 ▶). For related studies on oxadiazo­les, see: Wang et al. (2005 ▶); Zhang et al. (2007 ▶). For the synthesis of bis-1,3,4-oxadiazol, see: Al-Talib et al. (1990 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C20H12N6O2 M = 368.36 Monoclinic, a = 6.2424 (6) Å b = 7.6969 (7) Å c = 17.7321 (16) Å β = 96.635 (2)° V = 846.27 (14) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 183 K 0.30 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.971, T max = 0.985 4541 measured reflections 1665 independent reflections 1114 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042 wR(F 2) = 0.112 S = 1.01 1665 reflections 151 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.13 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1999 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809050557/nc2169sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809050557/nc2169Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C20H12N6O2F(000) = 380
Mr = 368.36Dx = 1.446 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.2424 (6) Åθ = 2.3–26.1°
b = 7.6969 (7) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 17.7321 (16) ÅT = 183 K
β = 96.635 (2)°Needle, yellow
V = 846.27 (14) Å30.30 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer1665 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1114 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.028
ω scansθmax = 26.1°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)h = −5→7
Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.985k = −9→6
4541 measured reflectionsl = −21→20
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.112H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0489P)2 + 0.1652P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1665 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
151 parametersΔρmax = 0.18 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.13 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O11.0105 (2)0.26943 (17)0.91503 (7)0.0455 (4)
N11.0141 (3)0.2372 (2)1.03852 (9)0.0481 (5)
N20.8290 (3)0.1534 (2)1.00208 (9)0.0490 (5)
C21.3123 (3)0.4031 (2)0.99232 (11)0.0393 (5)
C60.6794 (3)0.1193 (3)0.86751 (11)0.0427 (5)
C41.1139 (3)0.3024 (2)0.98550 (10)0.0406 (5)
C50.8350 (3)0.1759 (2)0.93029 (11)0.0419 (5)
C11.4231 (3)0.4324 (3)1.06365 (12)0.0445 (5)
C31.3910 (3)0.4712 (3)0.92850 (11)0.0436 (5)
N30.3677 (3)0.0203 (3)0.75019 (11)0.0710 (6)
C100.5034 (4)0.0236 (3)0.88153 (14)0.0559 (6)
C70.6983 (4)0.1636 (3)0.79320 (13)0.0578 (6)
C80.5402 (4)0.1127 (4)0.73749 (14)0.0672 (7)
C90.3534 (4)−0.0212 (4)0.82157 (14)0.0673 (7)
H21.316 (3)0.452 (2)0.8803 (12)0.048 (5)*
H11.365 (3)0.390 (2)1.1064 (12)0.046 (6)*
H30.483 (3)−0.009 (3)0.9316 (13)0.063 (7)*
H60.550 (4)0.142 (3)0.6864 (15)0.085 (8)*
H50.812 (4)0.222 (3)0.7800 (13)0.069 (8)*
H40.234 (4)−0.079 (3)0.8314 (14)0.086 (9)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0404 (8)0.0544 (9)0.0408 (8)−0.0085 (6)0.0005 (6)−0.0010 (6)
N10.0434 (10)0.0573 (11)0.0424 (9)−0.0076 (8)−0.0004 (8)−0.0024 (8)
N20.0453 (10)0.0571 (11)0.0434 (10)−0.0091 (8)0.0001 (8)−0.0006 (8)
C20.0336 (10)0.0411 (11)0.0419 (11)0.0023 (8)−0.0017 (8)−0.0022 (8)
C60.0395 (11)0.0451 (12)0.0425 (11)−0.0004 (9)0.0001 (9)−0.0044 (9)
C40.0389 (11)0.0445 (12)0.0367 (10)0.0018 (9)−0.0027 (9)−0.0033 (9)
C50.0362 (11)0.0428 (11)0.0463 (12)−0.0027 (9)0.0026 (9)−0.0004 (9)
C10.0423 (12)0.0521 (13)0.0383 (11)−0.0018 (10)0.0012 (9)0.0029 (10)
C30.0399 (12)0.0509 (12)0.0377 (11)0.0003 (9)−0.0054 (9)−0.0013 (9)
N30.0657 (14)0.0925 (16)0.0512 (12)−0.0132 (12)−0.0083 (10)−0.0080 (11)
C100.0573 (14)0.0641 (15)0.0452 (13)−0.0159 (11)0.0012 (11)0.0002 (11)
C70.0552 (14)0.0711 (16)0.0464 (13)−0.0106 (12)0.0028 (11)0.0003 (11)
C80.0718 (17)0.0867 (19)0.0414 (13)−0.0059 (14)−0.0007 (12)0.0022 (12)
C90.0559 (16)0.088 (2)0.0559 (16)−0.0232 (14)−0.0020 (12)−0.0079 (13)
O1—C41.362 (2)C1—H10.94 (2)
O1—C51.364 (2)C3—C1i1.371 (3)
N1—C41.288 (2)C3—H20.94 (2)
N1—N21.413 (2)N3—C91.319 (3)
N2—C51.290 (2)N3—C81.331 (3)
C2—C31.387 (3)C10—C91.377 (3)
C2—C11.388 (3)C10—H30.95 (2)
C2—C41.454 (3)C7—C81.370 (3)
C6—C101.369 (3)C7—H50.89 (2)
C6—C71.379 (3)C8—H60.94 (3)
C6—C51.457 (3)C9—H40.90 (3)
C1—C3i1.371 (3)
C4—O1—C5102.87 (14)C2—C1—H1118.9 (13)
C4—N1—N2106.44 (15)C1i—C3—C2119.80 (18)
C5—N2—N1105.93 (16)C1i—C3—H2120.2 (12)
C3—C2—C1119.71 (18)C2—C3—H2120.0 (12)
C3—C2—C4120.80 (17)C9—N3—C8116.0 (2)
C1—C2—C4119.48 (18)C6—C10—C9118.9 (2)
C10—C6—C7117.7 (2)C6—C10—H3120.6 (14)
C10—C6—C5120.01 (18)C9—C10—H3120.5 (14)
C7—C6—C5122.2 (2)C8—C7—C6119.0 (2)
N1—C4—O1112.27 (16)C8—C7—H5118.8 (15)
N1—C4—C2128.76 (17)C6—C7—H5122.3 (15)
O1—C4—C2118.96 (16)N3—C8—C7124.1 (2)
N2—C5—O1112.49 (16)N3—C8—H6115.6 (16)
N2—C5—C6128.40 (18)C7—C8—H6120.3 (16)
O1—C5—C6119.09 (17)N3—C9—C10124.4 (2)
C3i—C1—C2120.48 (19)N3—C9—H4117.0 (17)
C3i—C1—H1120.5 (12)C10—C9—H4118.5 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H2···N3ii0.94 (2)2.52 (2)3.407 (3)158.7 (16)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H2⋯N3i 0.94 (2)2.52 (2)3.407 (3)158.7 (16)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  Homochiral crystallization of helical coordination chains bridged by achiral ligands: can it be controlled by the ligand structure?

Authors:  Yong-Tao Wang; Ming-Liang Tong; Hai-Hua Fan; He-Zhou Wang; Xiao-Ming Chen
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of substituted 3-alkylthio-4,5-diaryl-4H-1,2,4-triazoles as selective COX-2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Latifeh Navidpour; Hamed Shafaroodi; Khosrou Abdi; Mohsen Amini; Mohammad H Ghahremani; Ahmad Reza Dehpour; Abbas Shafiee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.641

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.