Literature DB >> 21578568

Tris(ethyl-enediamine)zinc(II) hexa-fluorido-silicate.

Yang Li, Qi Shi, Alexandra M Z Slawin, J Derek Woollins, Jinxiang Dong.   

Abstract

The title compound, [Zn(C(2)H(8)N(2))(3)](SiF(6)), was synthesized ionothermally using choline chloride-imidazolidone as solvent and template provider. In the crystal structure, the anions and cations are located on special positions of site symmetry 3.2 and show a typical octa-hedral geometry. The Zn(II) ion is coordinated by six N atoms from three ethyl-enediamine mol-ecules. The crystal structure displays weak hydrogen bonding between [SiF(6)](2-) anions and the ethyl-enediamine NH hydrogen atoms.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578568      PMCID: PMC2972015          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809045693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Ray et al. (1973 ▶); Bernhardt & Riley (2003 ▶); Cernak et al. (1984 ▶); Emsley et al. (1989 ▶); Cheng et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Zn(C2H8N2)3](SiF6) M = 387.77 Hexagonal, a = 9.192 (2) Å c = 9.755 (3) Å V = 713.8 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.87 mm−1 T = 93 K 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.835, T max = 0.835 4809 measured reflections 534 independent reflections 499 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.045

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027 wR(F 2) = 0.059 S = 1.11 534 reflections 32 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 177 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.01 (3) Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809045693/bt5123sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809045693/bt5123Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Zn(C2H8N2)3](SiF6)Dx = 1.804 Mg m3
Mr = 387.77Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Trigonal, P6322Cell parameters from 1402 reflections
Hall symbol: P 6c 2cθ = 6.6–54.6°
a = 9.192 (2) ŵ = 1.87 mm1
c = 9.755 (3) ÅT = 93 K
V = 713.8 (3) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 20.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 400
Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer534 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode499 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
confocalRint = 0.045
Detector resolution: 0.83 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.3°
ω scansh = −10→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2004)k = −10→11
Tmin = 0.835, Tmax = 0.835l = −11→9
4809 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.059w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0158P)2 + 0.5912P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.11(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
534 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
32 parametersΔρmin = −0.38 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 177 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.01 (3)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Si10.33330.66670.75000.0135 (3)
F10.48288 (18)0.6657 (2)0.85081 (14)0.0250 (3)
Zn10.66670.33330.75000.01508 (18)
N10.8544 (2)0.5434 (2)0.87149 (19)0.0191 (4)
H1A0.82770.52430.96310.023*
H1B0.95840.55390.85890.023*
C10.8584 (4)0.6997 (3)0.8277 (2)0.0222 (5)
H2A0.96550.79860.85660.027*
H2B0.76510.70700.87160.027*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Si10.0151 (4)0.0151 (4)0.0102 (7)0.0076 (2)0.0000.000
F10.0260 (7)0.0352 (8)0.0183 (7)0.0186 (7)−0.0057 (6)−0.0011 (7)
Zn10.0169 (2)0.0169 (2)0.0115 (3)0.00843 (11)0.0000.000
N10.0185 (10)0.0240 (11)0.0137 (11)0.0097 (9)−0.0018 (8)0.0003 (8)
C10.0234 (13)0.0195 (11)0.0225 (12)0.0099 (13)−0.0031 (12)−0.0037 (8)
Si1—F1i1.6938 (13)Zn1—N1v2.186 (2)
Si1—F1ii1.6938 (13)Zn1—N1viii2.1863 (19)
Si1—F1iii1.6938 (14)Zn1—N1ix2.1863 (19)
Si1—F1iv1.6938 (14)N1—C11.482 (3)
Si1—F11.6938 (13)N1—H1A0.9200
Si1—F1v1.6938 (13)N1—H1B0.9200
Zn1—N1vi2.1863 (19)C1—C1viii1.523 (4)
Zn1—N1vii2.1863 (19)C1—H2A0.9900
Zn1—N12.186 (2)C1—H2B0.9900
F1i—Si1—F1ii90.69 (10)N1vi—Zn1—N1viii93.40 (7)
F1i—Si1—F1iii89.68 (7)N1vii—Zn1—N1viii170.67 (11)
F1ii—Si1—F1iii89.95 (10)N1—Zn1—N1viii80.19 (10)
F1i—Si1—F1iv89.95 (10)N1v—Zn1—N1viii93.40 (7)
F1ii—Si1—F1iv89.68 (7)N1vi—Zn1—N1ix170.67 (11)
F1iii—Si1—F1iv179.47 (11)N1vii—Zn1—N1ix93.40 (7)
F1i—Si1—F1179.47 (11)N1—Zn1—N1ix93.40 (7)
F1ii—Si1—F189.68 (7)N1v—Zn1—N1ix80.19 (10)
F1iii—Si1—F190.69 (10)N1viii—Zn1—N1ix93.74 (11)
F1iv—Si1—F189.68 (7)C1—N1—Zn1109.01 (14)
F1i—Si1—F1v89.68 (7)C1—N1—H1A109.9
F1ii—Si1—F1v179.47 (11)Zn1—N1—H1A109.9
F1iii—Si1—F1v89.68 (7)C1—N1—H1B109.9
F1iv—Si1—F1v90.69 (10)Zn1—N1—H1B109.9
F1—Si1—F1v89.95 (10)H1A—N1—H1B108.3
N1vi—Zn1—N1vii80.19 (10)N1—C1—C1viii109.52 (17)
N1vi—Zn1—N193.74 (11)N1—C1—H2A109.8
N1vii—Zn1—N193.40 (7)C1viii—C1—H2A109.8
N1vi—Zn1—N1v93.40 (7)N1—C1—H2B109.8
N1vii—Zn1—N1v93.74 (11)C1viii—C1—H2B109.8
N1—Zn1—N1v170.67 (11)H2A—C1—H2B108.2
N1vi—Zn1—N1—C1106.99 (17)N1ix—Zn1—N1—C1−79.03 (19)
N1vii—Zn1—N1—C1−172.64 (16)Zn1—N1—C1—C1viii−39.9 (3)
N1viii—Zn1—N1—C114.19 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···F1x0.922.263.113 (3)155
N1—H1A···F1xi0.922.493.239 (3)139
N1—H1B···F1vii0.922.253.153 (3)166
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯F1i 0.922.263.113 (3)155
N1—H1A⋯F1ii 0.922.493.239 (3)139
N1—H1B⋯F1iii 0.922.253.153 (3)166

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Tris(ethyl-enediamine)zinc(II) dichloride monohydrate.

Authors:  Lin Cheng; Yan-Yan Sun; Ya-Wen Zhang; Gang Xu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-09-06

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Tris(1,2-diamino-ethane)-nickel(II) hexa-fluoridosilicate.

Authors:  Jaroslava Haníková; Juraj Kuchár; Juraj Cernák; Giorgio Pelosi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.