Literature DB >> 21578351

2,2'-o-Phenyl-enediacetonitrile.

Yang Li1, Guoxiong Hua, Alexandra M Z Slawin, J Derek Woollins.   

Abstract

In the title compound, NCCH(2)C(6)H(4)CH(2)Cn class="Chemical">N, the bond lengths and angles are within normal ranges. The benzene ring makes dihedral angles of 4.94 (8) and 77.04 (8)° with the C-C-C-N mean planes. Weak non-conventional C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds are effective in the stabilization of the crystal structure. The weak C-H⋯N contacts form anti-parallel chains running in the a + c direction, and ring systems with two N-atom acceptors and four H-atom donors.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578351      PMCID: PMC2971004          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For reactions of Woollins’ Reagent see: Gray et al. (2005 ▶); Hua et al. (2006 ▶, 2009 ▶); Hua & Woollins (2009 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H8N2 M = 156.18 Monoclinic, a = 8.3882 (18) Å b = 8.1605 (15) Å c = 11.993 (2) Å β = 101.890 (6)° V = 803.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 93 K 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.977, T max = 0.988 5271 measured reflections 1660 independent reflections 1330 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.031

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.051 wR(F 2) = 0.133 S = 1.09 1660 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041506/si2203sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041506/si2203Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H8N2F(000) = 328
Mr = 156.18Dx = 1.291 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.3882 (18) ÅCell parameters from 2633 reflections
b = 8.1605 (15) Åθ = 2.7–28.3°
c = 11.993 (2) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
β = 101.890 (6)°T = 93 K
V = 803.4 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer1660 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode1330 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
confocalRint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 0.83 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.7°, θmin = 2.7°
ω scansh = −11→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2004)k = −9→10
Tmin = 0.977, Tmax = 0.988l = −13→15
5271 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.133H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0698P)2 + 0.0077P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1660 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.77845 (13)0.05887 (16)0.95174 (10)0.0215 (3)
C20.72184 (13)0.13136 (16)1.04228 (10)0.0218 (3)
C70.83384 (14)0.16768 (16)0.86390 (10)0.0257 (3)
H7A0.74040.23500.82530.031*
H7B0.91910.24330.90380.031*
C30.66532 (15)0.03264 (16)1.12009 (11)0.0250 (3)
H30.62730.08171.18160.030*
C80.89813 (14)0.07728 (16)0.77779 (10)0.0252 (3)
N10.94789 (13)0.00673 (14)0.70957 (10)0.0313 (3)
C100.88145 (15)0.38338 (15)1.10361 (10)0.0248 (4)
C90.71906 (14)0.31597 (16)1.05579 (11)0.0249 (3)
H9A0.67680.36660.98050.030*
H9B0.64380.34481.10640.030*
C50.71958 (14)−0.20835 (16)1.02028 (11)0.0278 (4)
H50.7192−0.32421.01260.033*
C60.77646 (14)−0.11076 (16)0.94203 (11)0.0248 (4)
H60.8146−0.16070.88090.030*
N21.00792 (13)0.43446 (14)1.14226 (9)0.0318 (3)
C40.66348 (14)−0.13701 (17)1.10929 (11)0.0271 (3)
H40.6239−0.20341.16280.033*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0169 (6)0.0226 (7)0.0238 (7)0.0002 (4)0.0009 (5)0.0007 (5)
C20.0176 (6)0.0247 (7)0.0221 (7)0.0023 (5)0.0013 (5)−0.0002 (5)
C70.0267 (7)0.0232 (7)0.0274 (7)0.0013 (5)0.0062 (5)0.0001 (6)
C30.0207 (7)0.0311 (8)0.0220 (7)−0.0002 (5)0.0019 (5)−0.0002 (6)
C80.0217 (7)0.0285 (7)0.0252 (7)−0.0031 (5)0.0043 (5)0.0008 (6)
N10.0292 (7)0.0337 (8)0.0319 (7)−0.0012 (5)0.0085 (5)−0.0019 (5)
C100.0321 (7)0.0198 (7)0.0243 (7)0.0044 (5)0.0097 (6)−0.0012 (5)
C90.0256 (7)0.0240 (8)0.0250 (7)0.0021 (5)0.0049 (5)−0.0018 (6)
C50.0257 (7)0.0210 (7)0.0342 (8)−0.0006 (5)0.0007 (6)0.0018 (6)
C60.0241 (7)0.0235 (8)0.0263 (7)0.0027 (5)0.0040 (5)−0.0023 (6)
N20.0325 (7)0.0272 (7)0.0359 (7)−0.0019 (5)0.0071 (5)−0.0044 (5)
C40.0234 (7)0.0314 (8)0.0253 (7)−0.0034 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0054 (6)
C1—C61.3890 (19)C8—N11.1471 (15)
C1—C21.4025 (16)C10—N21.1452 (15)
C1—C71.5218 (18)C10—C91.4714 (17)
C2—C31.3882 (18)C9—H9A0.9900
C2—C91.5159 (18)C9—H9B0.9900
C7—C81.4599 (17)C5—C41.3809 (18)
C7—H7A0.9900C5—C61.3882 (17)
C7—H7B0.9900C5—H50.9500
C3—C41.390 (2)C6—H60.9500
C3—H30.9500C4—H40.9500
C6—C1—C2119.02 (11)N2—C10—C9178.97 (14)
C6—C1—C7121.58 (11)C10—C9—C2112.32 (10)
C2—C1—C7119.36 (12)C10—C9—H9A109.1
C3—C2—C1119.52 (13)C2—C9—H9A109.1
C3—C2—C9119.34 (11)C10—C9—H9B109.1
C1—C2—C9121.14 (11)C2—C9—H9B109.1
C8—C7—C1113.88 (11)H9A—C9—H9B107.9
C8—C7—H7A108.8C4—C5—C6120.00 (12)
C1—C7—H7A108.8C4—C5—H5120.0
C8—C7—H7B108.8C6—C5—H5120.0
C1—C7—H7B108.8C1—C6—C5121.00 (11)
H7A—C7—H7B107.7C1—C6—H6119.5
C2—C3—C4120.94 (12)C5—C6—H6119.5
C2—C3—H3119.5C5—C4—C3119.53 (12)
C4—C3—H3119.5C5—C4—H4120.2
N1—C8—C7179.54 (14)C3—C4—H4120.2
C6—C1—C2—C30.04 (16)C3—C2—C9—C10103.33 (13)
C7—C1—C2—C3177.52 (11)C1—C2—C9—C10−77.54 (13)
C6—C1—C2—C9−179.09 (11)C2—C1—C6—C50.00 (17)
C7—C1—C2—C9−1.61 (15)C7—C1—C6—C5−177.43 (10)
C6—C1—C7—C8−5.75 (16)C4—C5—C6—C10.15 (18)
C2—C1—C7—C8176.84 (10)C6—C5—C4—C3−0.34 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.23 (17)C2—C3—C4—C50.38 (18)
C9—C2—C3—C4178.91 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C9—H9A···N1i0.992.573.5605 (18)176
C9—H9B···N1ii0.992.563.5210 (17)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C9—H9A⋯N1i0.992.573.5605 (18)176
C9—H9B⋯N1ii0.992.563.5210 (17)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis of primary arylselenoamides by reaction of aryl nitriles with Woollins' reagent.

Authors:  Guoxiong Hua; Yang Li; Alexandra M Z Slawin; J Derek Woollins
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 6.005

3.  A new synthesis of (PhPSe2)2 (Woollins reagent) and its use in the synthesis of novel P-Se heterocycles.

Authors:  Ian P Gray; Pravat Bhattacharyya; Alexandra M Z Slawin; J Derek Woollins
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Formation and reactivity of phosphorus-selenium rings.

Authors:  Guoxiong Hua; J Derek Woollins
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.