Literature DB >> 21578234

1,5-Bis(2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)naphthalene.

A C Santos, M Ramos Silva, P V Monsanto, A Matos Beja, A J F N Sobral.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(22)H(22)N(2), the asymmetric unit contains one half-mol-ecule. A crystallographic inversion centre is located at the mid-point of the bond common to both rings, in the central naphthalene unit. Quantum-mechanical ab initio calculations on the isolated mol-ecule showed that the minimum energy configuration occurs when the naphthalene ring system and the pyrrolyl groups deviate only slightly from perpendicularity. In the crystal, due to the effects of crystal packing, the mol-ecule deviates by approximately 4° from the a priori expected ideal value of 90° [C-C-N-C torsion angle = 86.11 (15)°].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578234      PMCID: PMC2971233          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809038999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related compounds, see: Andrade et al. (2008 ▶); Ramos Silva et al. (2002 ▶); Sobral (2006 ▶); Sobral & Rocha Gonsalves (2001a ▶,b ▶). For the ab initio calculation method, see: Schmidt et al. (1993 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C22H22N2 M = 314.42 Monoclinic, a = 8.7562 (3) Å b = 7.2806 (2) Å c = 14.1380 (5) Å β = 101.4721 (16)° V = 883.30 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.07 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.30 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.892, T max = 0.999 23689 measured reflections 2415 independent reflections 1798 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044 wR(F 2) = 0.160 S = 1.11 2415 reflections 111 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809038999/pk2188sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809038999/pk2188Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C22H22N2F(000) = 336
Mr = 314.42Dx = 1.182 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 8233 reflections
a = 8.7562 (3) Åθ = 2.4–28.6°
b = 7.2806 (2) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
c = 14.1380 (5) ÅT = 293 K
β = 101.4721 (16)°Plate, brown
V = 883.30 (5) Å30.30 × 0.30 × 0.02 mm
Z = 2
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer2415 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1798 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.028
φ and ω scansθmax = 29.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)h = −12→11
Tmin = 0.892, Tmax = 0.999k = −10→9
23689 measured reflectionsl = −18→19
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.160H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0861P)2 + 0.0939P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2415 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
111 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N1−0.25783 (11)0.16842 (14)−0.15743 (7)0.0413 (3)
C1−0.37264 (14)0.28237 (17)−0.13576 (10)0.0457 (3)
C2−0.40388 (17)0.41020 (19)−0.20743 (11)0.0581 (4)
H2−0.47650.5046−0.21170.070*
C4−0.21687 (17)0.2256 (2)−0.24234 (10)0.0543 (4)
C3−0.3073 (2)0.3747 (2)−0.27363 (11)0.0644 (5)
H3−0.30540.4416−0.32940.077*
C5−0.4403 (2)0.2558 (2)−0.04885 (14)0.0677 (5)
H5A−0.52350.3419−0.04960.102*
H5B−0.36120.27520.00790.102*
H5C−0.48000.1329−0.04840.102*
C6−0.0984 (3)0.1270 (3)−0.28455 (14)0.0867 (6)
H6A−0.08870.1846−0.34410.130*
H6B−0.12980.0015−0.29660.130*
H6C0.00010.1310−0.24030.130*
C7−0.03746 (12)0.07020 (14)−0.03141 (8)0.0338 (3)
C8−0.18058 (13)0.02723 (15)−0.09515 (8)0.0374 (3)
C9−0.24388 (15)−0.14418 (17)−0.09648 (10)0.0472 (3)
H9−0.3369−0.1703−0.13890.057*
C10−0.16905 (15)−0.28164 (17)−0.03401 (10)0.0478 (3)
H10−0.2135−0.3978−0.03520.057*
C11−0.03195 (14)−0.24638 (15)0.02834 (9)0.0403 (3)
H110.0162−0.33870.06910.048*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0373 (5)0.0397 (5)0.0418 (6)0.0034 (4)−0.0041 (4)0.0032 (4)
C10.0380 (6)0.0377 (6)0.0544 (7)0.0016 (5)−0.0074 (5)−0.0072 (5)
C20.0550 (9)0.0415 (7)0.0643 (9)0.0071 (6)−0.0209 (7)−0.0012 (6)
C40.0542 (8)0.0616 (9)0.0425 (7)0.0017 (6)−0.0016 (6)0.0083 (6)
C30.0725 (10)0.0591 (9)0.0505 (8)−0.0008 (7)−0.0144 (7)0.0161 (7)
C50.0623 (10)0.0612 (9)0.0825 (11)0.0101 (7)0.0214 (8)−0.0053 (8)
C60.0921 (14)0.1113 (16)0.0625 (10)0.0227 (12)0.0292 (10)0.0146 (10)
C70.0322 (6)0.0315 (5)0.0362 (6)0.0009 (4)0.0033 (4)0.0000 (4)
C80.0344 (6)0.0360 (6)0.0390 (6)0.0030 (4)0.0003 (5)0.0012 (4)
C90.0376 (7)0.0421 (6)0.0551 (7)−0.0048 (5)−0.0071 (5)−0.0012 (5)
C100.0444 (7)0.0332 (6)0.0611 (8)−0.0075 (5)−0.0012 (6)0.0011 (5)
C110.0401 (6)0.0316 (5)0.0468 (7)0.0005 (4)0.0026 (5)0.0042 (4)
N1—C41.3835 (17)C6—H6A0.9600
N1—C11.3840 (16)C6—H6B0.9600
N1—C81.4326 (14)C6—H6C0.9600
C1—C21.3628 (19)C7—C11i1.4164 (15)
C1—C51.479 (2)C7—C81.4253 (15)
C2—C31.404 (3)C7—C7i1.426 (2)
C2—H20.9300C8—C91.3642 (17)
C4—C31.365 (2)C9—C101.4075 (18)
C4—C61.481 (2)C9—H90.9300
C3—H30.9300C10—C111.3649 (17)
C5—H5A0.9600C10—H100.9300
C5—H5B0.9600C11—C7i1.4164 (15)
C5—H5C0.9600C11—H110.9300
C4—N1—C1109.68 (11)C4—C6—H6A109.5
C4—N1—C8125.23 (11)C4—C6—H6B109.5
C1—N1—C8124.69 (11)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C2—C1—N1106.98 (13)C4—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C1—C5130.75 (14)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—C5122.26 (12)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C1—C2—C3108.15 (13)C11i—C7—C8122.42 (10)
C1—C2—H2125.9C11i—C7—C7i119.26 (12)
C3—C2—H2125.9C8—C7—C7i118.32 (12)
C3—C4—N1106.65 (14)C9—C8—C7120.88 (10)
C3—C4—C6131.51 (15)C9—C8—N1120.47 (10)
N1—C4—C6121.82 (13)C7—C8—N1118.64 (10)
C4—C3—C2108.53 (13)C8—C9—C10120.31 (11)
C4—C3—H3125.7C8—C9—H9119.8
C2—C3—H3125.7C10—C9—H9119.8
C1—C5—H5A109.5C11—C10—C9120.76 (11)
C1—C5—H5B109.5C11—C10—H10119.6
H5A—C5—H5B109.5C9—C10—H10119.6
C1—C5—H5C109.5C10—C11—C7i120.47 (11)
H5A—C5—H5C109.5C10—C11—H11119.8
H5B—C5—H5C109.5C7i—C11—H11119.8
C4—N1—C1—C20.28 (14)C11i—C7—C8—C9179.75 (12)
C8—N1—C1—C2173.32 (11)C7i—C7—C8—C9−0.4 (2)
C4—N1—C1—C5−179.96 (13)C11i—C7—C8—N1−0.83 (18)
C8—N1—C1—C5−6.91 (19)C7i—C7—C8—N1179.03 (12)
N1—C1—C2—C3−0.09 (15)C4—N1—C8—C9−101.92 (16)
C5—C1—C2—C3−179.82 (15)C1—N1—C8—C986.11 (15)
C1—N1—C4—C3−0.36 (16)C4—N1—C8—C778.66 (16)
C8—N1—C4—C3−173.36 (11)C1—N1—C8—C7−93.32 (14)
C1—N1—C4—C6−178.79 (15)C7—C8—C9—C100.5 (2)
C8—N1—C4—C68.2 (2)N1—C8—C9—C10−178.89 (12)
N1—C4—C3—C20.30 (17)C8—C9—C10—C11−0.4 (2)
C6—C4—C3—C2178.52 (17)C9—C10—C11—C7i0.1 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.14 (17)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Ethyl 4-dodecyl-3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate: intermolecular interactions in an amphiphilic pyrrole.

Authors:  Manuela Ramos Silva; Ana Matos Beja; Jose Antonio Paixão; Abilio J F N Sobral; Susana H Lopes; A M d'A Rocha Gonsalves
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-08-31       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Self-aggregation of free base porphyrins in aqueous solution and in DMPC vesicles.

Authors:  Suzana M Andrade; Raquel Teixeira; Sílvia M B Costa; Abílio J F N Sobral
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.